Chip formation and orthogonal cutting optimisation of unidirectional carbon fibre composites

This study presents a thorough experimental investigation utilising the design of experiments and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine the impact of machining process parameters on chip formation mechanisms, machining forces, workpiece surface integrity, and damage resulting from the orthogonal cutting of unidirectional CFRP. The study identified the mechanisms behind chip formation and found it to significantly impact the workpiece orientation of fibre and the tool’s cutting angle, resulting in increased fibre bounceback at larger fibre orientation angles and when using smaller rake angle tools. Increasing the depth of cut and fibre orientation angle results in an increased damage depth, while using higher rake angles reduces it. An analytical model based on response surface analysis for predicting machining forces, damage, surface roughness, and bounceback was also developed. The ANOVA results indicate that fibre orientation is the most significant factor in machining CFRP, while cutting speed is insignificant. Increasing fibre orientation angle and depth leads to deeper damage, while larger tool rake angles re-duce damage. Machining workpieces with 0° fibre orientation angle results in the least subsurface damage, and surface roughness is unaffected by the tool rake angle for fibre orientations between 0° to 90° but worsens for angles greater than 90°. Optimisation of cutting parameters were subsequently optimised to improve machined workpiece surface quality and reduce forces. The experimental results showed that negative rake angle and cutting at moderately low speeds (366 mm/min) is the optimal conditions for machining laminates with a fibre angle of θ = 45°. On the other hand, for composite materials with fibre angles of θ = 90° and θ = 135°, it is recommended to use a high positive rake angle and cutting speeds.

1. Sun, G.; Chen, D.; Zhu, G.; Li, Q. Lightweight hybrid materials and structures for energy absorption: A state-of-the-art review and outlook. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 35, 108760.
2. Galatas, A.; Hassanin, H.; Zweiri, Y.; Seneviratne, L. Additive manufactured sandwich composite/ABS parts for unmanned aerial vehicle applications. Polymers 2018, 10, 1262.
3. Muflikhun, M.; Yokozeki, T. Steel plate cold commercial—Carbon fiber reinforced plastics hybrid laminates for automotive applications: Curing perspective with thermal residual effect. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 2700–2714.
4. Abbood, I.; Odaa, S.; Hassan, K.; Jasim, M. Properties evaluation of fiber reinforced polymers and their constituent materials used in structures—A review. Mater. Today 2021, 43, 1003–1008.
5. Wang, D.; Ramulu, M.; Arola, D. Orthogonal cutting mechanisms of graphite/epoxy composite. Part I: Unidirectional laminate. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1995, 172, 1623–1638.
6. Wang, X.; Zhang, L. An experiemental investigation into the orthogonal cutting of uni-directional fibre reinforced plastics. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2003, 43, 1015–1022.
7. Bhatnagar, N.; Ramakrishnan, N.; Naik, N.; Komanduri, R. On the machining of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) composite laminates. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1995, 35, 701–716.
8. Kaneeda, T. CFRP cutting mechanism. Trans. N. Am. Manuf. Res. Inst. SME 1991, 19, 216–221.
9. Calzada, K.A.; Kapoor, S.G.; Vor, R.E.D.; Samuel, J.; Srivastava, A.K. Modeling and in-terpretation of fiber orientation-based failure mechanisms in machining of carbon fi-ber-reinforced composites. J. Manuf. Process. 2012, 14, 141–149.
10. Zitoune, R.; Collombet, F.; Lachaud, F.; Piquet, R.; Pasquet, P. Experiment calculation comparison of the cutting conditions representative of the long fiber composite drilling phase. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 455–466.
11. Ramulu, M. Machining and surface integrity of fibre-reinforced plastic composites. Sad-hana 1997, 22, 449–472.
12. Pwu, H.; Hocheng, H. Chip formation model of cutting fiber-reinforced plastics perpen-dicular to fiber axis. J. Manuf. Sci. E 1998, 120, 192–196.
13. Sheikh-Ahmad, J.Y. Machining of Polymer Composites; Springer Science + Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009.
14. Koplev, A.; Lystrup, A.; Vorm, T. The cutting process, chip, and cutting forces in ma-chining CFRP. Composites 1983, 14, 371–376.
15. Bhatnagar, N.; Nayak, D.; Singh, I.; Chouhan, H.; Mahajan, P. Determination of ma-chining-induced damage characteristic of fiber reinforced plastic composite laminates. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2004, 19, 1009–1023.
16. Iliescu, D.; Gehin, D.; Iordanoff, I.; Girot, F.; Guetiérrez, M. A discrete element method for the simulation of CFRP cutting. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 73–80.
17. Dandekar, C.; Shin, Y. Multiphase finite element modeling of machining unidirectional composites: Prediction of debonding and fiber damage. J. Manuf. Sci. E 2008, 130, 1–12.
18. Li, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhu, W. Damage behaviors of unidi-rectional CFRP in orthogonal cutting: A comparison between single- and multiple-pass strategies. Compos. B Eng. 2020, 185, 107774.
19. T800s Data Sheet, N/A; Toray Composite Materials America Inc.: Tacoma, WA, USA.
20. Hexcel, HexPly® M21 Epoxy Matrix (180 °C/356 °F Curing Matrix) Product Data, N/A. Available online: (accessed on).
21. Rao, G.V.G.; Mahajan, P.; Bhatnagar, N. Three-dimensional macro-mechanical finite element model for machining of unidirectional-fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 498, 142–149.
22. Kahwash, F.; Shyha, I.; Maheri, A. Machining unidirectional composites using sin-gle-point tools: Analysis of cutting forces, chip formation and surface integrity. Procedia Eng. 2015, 132, 569–576.
23. Li, H.; Qin, X.; He, G.; Gin, Y.; Sun, D.; Prince, M. Investigation of chip formation and fracture toughness in orthogonal cutting of UD-CFRP. Int. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 82, 1079–1088.
24. Voß, R.; Henerichs, M.; Kuster, F.; Wegener, K. Chip root analysis after machining carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) at different fiber orientations. Procedia CIRP 2014, 14, 217–222.
25. Parida, A.; Routara, B.; Bhuyan, R. Surface roughness model and parametric optimisation in machining of GFRP composite: Taguchi and Response surface methodology approach. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 3065–3074.
26. Tsao, C.; Chiu, Y. Evaluation of drilling parameters on thrust force in drilling carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composite laminates using compound core-special drills. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2011, 51, 740–744.
27. Essa, K.; Hartley, P. Optimisation of conventional spinning process parameters by means of numerical simulation and statistical analysis. Proc. IMechE Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2010, 224, 1691–1705.