EMPOWERCARE: EMPOWERing individuals & communities to manage their own CARE

EMPOWERing individuals and communities to manage their own CARE (EMPOWERCARE) was a 3-year social innovation project involving 13 cross border European partners. EMPOWERCARE developed a holistic community asset approach to respond to current gaps in the care of people in the target group (those aged 65+ and those aged 50+ with at least one chronic condition). It aimed to address challenges facing our societies concerning the care of our ageing populations and when older people are not being involved in decisions concerning their own health and wellbeing.

The project ensured that older people are at the forefront of improved technology and better care from within their
communities. This sought to improve their situation but also tackle the financial issues of an ageing population and
improve social cohesion.

The main key messages from the evaluation of the project initiatives were:

• Self-efficacy – Across all sites, ‘inactive’ participants at baseline showed a statistically significant increase
in self-efficacy at the end of the initiatives. Qualitative data confirmed end-users’ increased levels of selfconfidence
and self-efficacy around taking action in relation to their own health.
• Emotional and social wellbeing - When considering all project sites, there was no significant decrease of
the level of reported loneliness, overall and by type (emotional and social), for participants who reported
feeling lonely at the start of the initiative. For participants from philosophically focused initiatives, who
reported being lonely at the start of the initiative, there was a slight decrease in emotional loneliness from
baseline, although this change was not statistically significant. Overall, there was no decrease, but for
initiatives that were philosophically focused there was a negative trend. Qualitative data evidenced the
positive impact initiatives had in tackling end-users’ loneliness.
• Digital literacy - When analysing survey responses from all sites, end-users reported internet healthseeking
behaviour did change at the end of initiatives. Nonetheless, for the sites focusing more on
technology, internet health-seeking behaviour increased from baseline to end of initiative, although the
positive change was not statistically significant. Qualitative data from end-users confirms the survey results
that those participating in the initiatives felt more digitally literate and confident in using technology for
their physical and mental health needs and to keep connected with their social networks.
• Internet health-seeking behaviour – There was no significant change in this area for end-users. This
could be explained by them receiving help in-person and therefore they felt less need to go online for help
with their health. For technology focused initiatives there was still no significant change, but there was
a positive trend for technology enthusiasm. Anxiety around technology use remained and the qualitative
data relating to this indicated there was room to build on technology skills.
• Person centred care - Across all sites, for those that had a baseline of below average person-centredness
or lower, mean scores increased from baseline to end of initiatives, and this improvement was statistically
significant, indicating that the project initiatives significantly increased workforce person-centeredness.
There were also similar significant improvements in the specific areas of this scale of Climate of Safety,
Climate of Everydayness, Climate of community and Climate of Comprehensibility, indicating that the
project initiatives significantly increased workforce feelings of whether the workplace is a place where the
patients are in safe hands, staff use language that the patients can understand, it is easy for patients to
talk to the staff and where the patients have someone to talk to if they so wish. Qualitative data reflected
these results, talking about the transformation in people’s lives that was possible through being focused
on the needs of the individuals and what matters to them.
• Workforce technology uptake - Across all sites, survey results from workforce attitudes towards
technology did not show any change from baseline to end of initiatives. Similarly, there was no difference
between workforce participants in technology-focused and philosophical initiatives. Qualitative data
from the workforce showed an understanding of the need to embrace technology in their work and that
some of the drive for that need came from the implementation of COVID-19 restrictions.
• Job satisfaction and workforce training embeddedness – for job satisfaction there was no significant
change, although there was a positive trend for those who started below the top 15%. The context of
working through COVID-19 may have had a negative impact on job satisfaction. Across all sites, there
were higher average scores on certain areas of efficacy in relation to workforce training in implementing,
embedding, and integrating a complex healthcare initiative, such as reflective monitoring and collective
action compared to coherence, and cognitive participation findings suggest that overall workforce
members showed they are willing to engage in reflexive monitoring and collective action across all sites
– so they were willing to self-monitor and take time to think about their behaviour and work together
to take action. The qualitative data indicated that embedding training has enabled the workforce to
understand the value of taking time, reflecting and connecting, which are some of the key person-centred
competencies and attributes you would want to see in a transformed workforce.

The Cost Benefit Analysis showed:
• Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) evaluation indicate that individuals are willing to pay (WTP) on average
€10.31 per month from their own out of pocket expenses to use and obtain the health benefits and wellbeing
effects of participating in the EMPOWERCARE initiatives.
• WTP is positively influenced by the value individuals place on the technically focused initiatives, willingness
to participate in an alternative initiative along with improvements gained in emotional and social loneliness
because of the EMPOWERCARE initiatives.
• The WTP estimates defined in this evaluation provide significant insights for decision makers and healthcare
commissioners on the value that previous participants place on the services provided through the
EMPOWERCARE initiatives in local communities.
• Insights from the ‘Good Ancestor’ principles in FGD promotes the deliberation of long-term thinking which
can lead to the power of change, reshaping decisions to take account of future generations, while promoting
and encouraging sustainability in respect for future generations.

The evaluation results provide some positive results on the success of the EMPOWERCARE initiatives across the
4 countries. More analysis has been done per site to understand the different aspects of the EMPOWERCARE
Strategy, Workforce Transformation Package and Technology Blueprint that made a positive difference to end-users
and members of the workforce. This further analysis will provide a more comprehensive picture of the
impact of the EMPOWERCARE initiatives, as well as inform the next stages of work.

Anderberg, P., Eivazzadeh, S., & Berglund, J. S. (2019). A novel instrument for measuring older people’s attitudes toward technology
(TechPH): Development and validation. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(5), e13951.
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. Plenum Press.
Arrow, K., Solow,R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation. https://
edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4473366/mod_folder/intro/Arow_WTP.pdf
Daly, M., & Westwood, S. (2017) Asset based approaches, older people and social care: an analysis and critique. Ageing and
Society. 38(6): 1-13. DOI:10.1017/S0144686X17000071
De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2010). The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: tested on
data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European journal of ageing, 7, 121-130.
De Jong-Gierveld, J., & Kamphuls, F. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied psychological
measurement, 9(3), 289-299.
Drummond, M.F., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W. (1987). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edvardsson D., Sandman P.O. & Rasmussen B.(2008a) Construction and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish language
Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire – staff version. Journal of Nursing Management 17, 790–795.
Fat, L., Scholes, S., Boniface, S., Mindell J., & Stewart-Brown S. (2017) Evaluating and establishing the national norms for mental
well-being using the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): findings from the Health Survey for
England. Quality of Life Research, 26(5), 1129-1144.
Finch, T. L., Girling, M., May, C. R., Mair, F. S., Murray, E., Treweek, S., ... & Rapley, T. (2018). Improving the normalization of
complex initiatives: part 2-validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization
process theory (NPT). BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), 1-13.
Foot, J. & Hopkins, T. (2010) A glass half-full: how an asset approach can improve community health and well-being. [Report]
Improvement and Development Agency. http://www.assetbasedconsulting.net/uploads/publications/A%20glass%2...
pdf
Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stockard, J., & Tusler, M. (2005). Development and testing of a short form of the patient
activation measure. Health services research, 40(6p1), 1918-1930.
Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005) Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research.
2005;15(9):1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
Inoue, Y., Mifune, N., Saijo, T. (2023) Positive reputation for altruism toward future generations regardless of the cost for current
others. Front. Psychol. 13:895619. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895619
Mitchell, R. C., Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the
Future Press, Washington. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315060569
Mols, F., Pelle, A. J., & Kupper, N. (2009). Normative data of the SF-12 health survey with validation using postmyocardial infarction
patients in the Dutch population. Quality of life Research, 18, 403-414.
Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006). eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. Journal of medical Internet research, 8(4), e507.
O’Brien B, Gafni A.(1996). When Do the “Dollars” Make Sense?: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Contingent Valuation Studies
in Health Care. Medical Decision Making;16(3):288-299. doi:10.1177/0272989X9601600314
Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (2004) Realist Evaluation. Sage. [Online] Available at: http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.
pdf Accessed 14/12/20
Pawson, R. (2006) Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence. International Journal of Social Research
Methodology. 9:2:127-142. DOI: 10.1080/13645570600595314
Reeve, J., Cooper, L., Harrington, S., Rosbottom, P., & Watkins, J. (2016). Developing, delivering and evaluating primary mental
health care: the co-production of a new complex initiative. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 1-13.
Rentsch, J. R., & Steel, R. P. (1992). Construct and concurrent validation of the Andrews and Withey job satisfaction
questionnaire. Educational and psychological measurement, 52(2), 357-367.
Spencer, L.H., Lynch, M., Thomas, G. (2021). Developing a conversation about identifying community needs to embrace
wellbeing through social prescribing interventions: a qualitative study. The Lancet Public Health, 82. https://www.thelancet.com/
pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(21)02625-8.pdf
Spencer, L.H., Lynch, M., Thomas, G.M., Edwards, R. T. (2023). Intergenerational Deliberations for Long Term Sustainability.
Challenges 2023, 14(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/challe14010011
Stewart-Brown S, Tennant A, Tennant R, et al. (2009) Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being
Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes,
7(1), 1-8.
The World Bank (2022). Population ages 65 and above, total - France, United Kingdom, Belgium, Netherlands. https://data.
worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO?end=2021&locations=FR-GB-BE-NL&start=1960&view=chart Accessed 27/02/2023
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified
view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Vilagut, G., Forero, C. G., Pinto-Meza, A., Haro, J. M., De Graaf, R., Bruffaerts, R., ... & ESEMeD Investigators. (2013). The mental
component of the short-form 12 health survey (SF-12) as a measure of depressive disorders in the general population: results
with three alternative scoring methods. Value in Health, 16(4), 564-573.
Wang, C. & Burris, M. A. Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Health Education &
Behavior. 1997;24(3):369-387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309
Ware, Jr, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary
tests of reliability and validity. Medical care, 220-233.
World Health Organisation (2017). Global Strategy and Action Plan on Ageing and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yin, R. K., (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.