Abstract | Introduction In the context of a population that is growing older, and a number of high-profile scandals about care standards in hospital and community settings, having a skilled and knowledgeable workforce caring for older people is an ethical and policy imperative. Support workers make up the majority of the workforce in health and social care services for older people (aged 65 years and over), and yet little is known about the best way to facilitate their development. Given this gap, this review will draw on evidence to address the question: how can workforce development interventions improve the skills and the care standards of support workers within older people's health and social care services? Methods and analysis As we are interested in how and why workforce development interventions might work, in what circumstances and with whom, we will conduct a realist review, sourcing evidence from health, social care, policing and education. The review will be conducted in four steps over 18 months to (1) construct a theoretical framework, that is, the review’s programme theories; (2) retrieve, review and synthesise evidence relating to interventions designed to develop the support workforce guided by the programme theories; (3) ‘test out’ our synthesis findings and refine the programme theories, establish their practical relevance/potential for implementation and (4) formulate recommendations about improvements to current workforce development interventions to contribute to the improvement of care standards in older people's health and social care services, potentially transferrable to other services. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required to undertake this review. Knowledge exchange activities through stakeholder engagement and online postings are embedded throughout the lifetime of the project. The main output from this review will be a new theory driven framework for skill development for the support workforce in health and social care for older people. |
---|
References | 1. Wise J. Number of ‘oldest old’ has doubled in the past 25 years. BMJ 2010;340:c3057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2. Institute of Fiscal Studies. NHS and Social Care Funding: the outlook to 2021/22. 2012. http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk 3. Shield F, Enderby P, Nancarrow S. Stakeholder views of the training needs of an interprofessional practitioner who works with older people. Nurse Educ Today 2006;26:367–76 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 4. Care Quality Commission. Dignity and Nutrition Inspection Programme: National Overview. 2011. http://www.cqc.org.uk 5. Parliamentary & Health Service Ombudsman. Care and compassion? Report of the Health Service Ombudsman on ten investigations into NHS care of older people London: The Stationary Office, 2011. http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/care-and-compassion/home [Google Scholar] 6. Tadd W, Hillman A, Calnan S, et al. Dignity in practice: an exploration of the care of older adults in acute NHS Trusts. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2011 [Google Scholar] 7. Commission for Dignity in Care. Delivering dignity: securing dignity in care for older people in hospitals and care homes. Joint Report from Independent Commission on Dignity, 2012. http://www.nhsconfed.org/Publications/reports/Pages/Delivering-Digni... 8. Rudd AG, Hoffman A, Down C, et al. Access to stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the effect of age, gender and weekend admission. Age Aging 2007;36:247–55 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 9. Gott M, Small N, Barnes S, et al. Older people's views of a good death in heart failure: implications for palliative care provision. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:1113–21 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 10. Saks M, Allsop J, Chevannes M, et al. Review of health support workers. Report to the UK Departments of Health Leicester: Faculty of Health and Community Studies, De Montfort University, 2000 [Google Scholar] 11. Spilsbury K, Adamson J, Atkin K, et al. Evaluation of The development and impact of assistant practitioners supporting the work of ward-based registered nurses in acute NHS (Hospital) Trusts in England. Final report NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2010 [Google Scholar] 12. Nancarrow SA, Shuttleworth P, Tongue A, et al. Support workers in intermediate care. Health Soc Care Community 2005;13:338–44 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 13. Schneider J, Scales K, Bailey S, et al. Challenging care: the role and experience of health care assistants in dementia wards. Final report NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2010 [Google Scholar] 14. NHS Education for Scotland. Healthcare support workers. The development of the clinical support worker role: a review of the evidence. NHS Education for Scotland, 2010 [Google Scholar] 15. Skills for Care. Capable, competent, skilled. A workforce development strategy. Leeds: Skills for Care, 2011 [Google Scholar] 16. Janes N, Sidani S, Cott C, et al. Figuring it out in the moment: a theory of unregulated care providers’ knowledge utilization in dementia care settings. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2008;5:13–24 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17. Manthorpe J, Martineau S, Moriarty J, et al. Support workers in social care in England: a scoping study. Health Soc Care Community 2010;18:316–24 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 18. Griffiths P, Robinson S. Moving forward with healthcare support workforce regulation. London: National Nursing Research Unit, Kings College, 2010 [Google Scholar] 19. Cavendish C. The Cavendish review: an independent review into healthcare assistants and support workers in the NHS and social care settings. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-healthcare-assi... 20. Kessler I, Heron P, Dopson S, et al. The nature and consequences of support workers in a hospital setting. Final report NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2010 [Google Scholar] 21. Moran A, Enderby P, Nancarrow S. Defining and identifying common elements of and contextual influences on the roles of support workers in health and social care: a thematic analysis of the literature. J Eval Clin Pract 2010;17:1191–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 22. Wakefield A, Spilsbury K, Atkin K, et al. Assistant or substitute: exploring the fit between national policy vision and local practice realities of assistant practitioner job descriptions. Health Policy 2009;90:286–95 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 23. Nancarrow SA, Enderby P, Moran AM, et al. The relationship between workforce flexibility and the costs and outcomes of older peoples’ services. Final report NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2010 [Google Scholar] 24. Bond J, Bamford C, Arksey H, et al. Person- and carer-centred respite care for people with dementia: developing methods of evaluating the effectiveness of different models. Final report NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2009 [Google Scholar] 25. Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL. A five stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. Unpublished Report supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research Berkley: University of California, 1980 [Google Scholar] 26. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, et al. RAMESES publication standards: realist synthesis. BMC Med 2013;11:21 http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1741-7015-11-21.pdf [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 27. Wand T, White K, Patching J. Applying a realist(ic) framework to the evaluation of a new model of emergency department based mental health nursing practice. Nurs Inq 2010;17:231–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 28. Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R. The realist approach to evaluation research: an introduction. Int J Ther Rehabil 2012;19:250–9 [Google Scholar] 29. Gough D. Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal. BMC Med 2013;11:22 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/22 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 30. Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage Publications, 2006 [Google Scholar] 31. Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson A, et al. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci 2012;7:33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 32. Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Westhorp G, et al. Protocol-realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES). BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 33. McCormack B, Rycroft-Malone J, DeCorby K, et al. A realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-informed healthcare: a focus on change agency. Implement Sci 2013;8:107 http://www.implementationscience.com/content/8/1/107 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 34. Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S. Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press, 1985 [Google Scholar] 35. Bloom B. The taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I, Cognitive Domain London: Longman, 1956 [Google Scholar] 36. Kolb DA. Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. EnglewoodCliffs: Prentice Hall, 1984 [Google Scholar] 37. Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, et al. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci 2009;4:40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 38. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: towards a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1982;19:276–88 [Google Scholar] 39. McCormack B, Wright J, Dewer B, et al. A realist synthesis of evidence relating to practice development: findings from the literature review. Pract Dev Health Care 2007;6:25–55 [Google Scholar] 40. Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, et al. Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:174–80 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 41. Nutley S, Walters I, Davies HTO. Using evidence. How research can inform public services . Bristol: Policy Press, 2007 [Google Scholar] 42. Easterby-Smith M. Disciplines of organizational learning: contributions and critiques. Hum Relations 1997;50:1085–113 [Google Scholar] 43. Raelin JA. Work-based learning in practice. J Workplace Learn 1997;10:280–3 [Google Scholar] 44. Dewing J. Chapter 15. Becoming and being active learners and creating active learning workplaces: the value of active learning in international practice development. In: McCormack B, Manley K, Wilson V, eds. Nursing and healthcare. Oxford: Blackwells, 2008:273–94 [Google Scholar] 45. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Health care assistants: the views of managers of health care agencies on training and employment. J Nurs Manag 2005;13:83–92 [PubMed] [Google Scholar] |
---|