Evaluating the investment that healthcare organisations make in quality improvement requires knowledge of impact at multiple levels, including patient care, workforce and other organisational resources. The degree to which these resources help organisations to survive and thrive in the challenging contexts in which healthcare is designed and delivered is unknown. Investigating this question from the perspective of the Resource Based View (RBV) of the Firm may provide insights, although is not without challenge.
1. Crilly T, Jashapara A, Trenholm S, Peckham A, Currie G,
Ferlie E. Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations:
Synthesising the evidence and theory using perspectives
of organisational form, resource based view of the firm and
critical theory. NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research
2. Burton CR, Rycroft Malone J, Robert G, Willson A, Hopkins A.
Investigating the organisational impacts of quality improvement:
a protocol for a realist evaluation of improvement approaches
drawing on the Resource Based View of the Firm. BMJ Open
2014; 4. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005650
3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Briefing Paper for the Methods Working Party on the Cost
Effectiveness Threshold. London: NICE; 2008.
4. Health Foundation. Looking for value in hard times. London:
Health Foundation; 2012.
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Supporting investment in public health: Review of methods
for assessing cost effectiveness, cost impact and return on
investment. London: NICE; 2011.
6. Health Foundation. Perspectives on context. A selection of
essays considering the role of context in successful quality
improvement. London: Health Foundation; 2014.
7. Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning
the systems around the patient to co-designing services with the
patient. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 307–10. doi: 10.1136/
8. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage
Publications Inc; 1997.
9. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.
J Manage 1991; 17: 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
10. Barney J, Clarke D. Resource Based Theory: Creating and
Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University
11. Rosner M. Economic Determinants of Organizational Innovation.
Adm Sci Q 1968; 12: 614–25. doi: 10.2307/2391536
12. Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G. Organizing for Quality: the
improvement journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the
United States. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2008.
13. Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and
microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.
Strategic Management Journal 2007; 28: 1319–50. doi: 10.1002/
14. Bierly PE, Damanpour F, Santoro MD. The Application of
External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration
and Exploitation. Journal of Management Studies 2009; 46:
481–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00829.x
15. Newbert SL. Empirical research on the resource-based view of
the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research.
Strategic Management Journal 2007; 28: 121–46. doi: 10.1002/
16. Lockett A, Thompson S, Morgenstern U. The development
of the resource-based view of the firm: a critical appraisal.
International Journal of Management Reviews 2009; 11: 9–28.
17. Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton CR, Harvey G, McCormack
B, Graham I, et al. Collaborative action around implementation
in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and
Care: towards a programme theory. J Health Serv Res Policy
2013; 18: 13–26. doi: 10.1177/1355819613498859
18. Propper C. Competition, incentives and the English NHS. Health
Econ 2012; 21: 33–40. doi: 10.1002/hec.1804
19. Ferlie E, Ashburner L, Fitzgerald L, Pettigrew A. The New Public
Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
20. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Healthcare: Creating
Value-based Competition on Results. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press; 2006.
21. McCLure ML, Poulin MA, Sovie MD, Wandelt MA. Magnet
hospitals: attraction and retention of professional nurses. Kansas
City: American Academy of Nurses; 1983.
22. Doran T, Roland M. Lessons from Major Initiatives to Improve
Primary Care in the United Kingdom. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;
29: 1023–9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0069