Abstract | Evaluating the investment that healthcare organisations make in quality improvement requires knowledge of impact at multiple levels, including patient care, workforce and other organisational resources. The degree to which these resources help organisations to survive and thrive in the challenging contexts in which healthcare is designed and delivered is unknown. Investigating this question from the perspective of the Resource Based View (RBV) of the Firm may provide insights, although is not without challenge. |
---|
References | 1. Crilly T, Jashapara A, Trenholm S, Peckham A, Currie G, Ferlie E. Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations: Synthesising the evidence and theory using perspectives of organisational form, resource based view of the firm and critical theory. NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme; 2013. 2. Burton CR, Rycroft Malone J, Robert G, Willson A, Hopkins A. Investigating the organisational impacts of quality improvement: a protocol for a realist evaluation of improvement approaches drawing on the Resource Based View of the Firm. BMJ Open 2014; 4. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005650 3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Briefing Paper for the Methods Working Party on the Cost Effectiveness Threshold. London: NICE; 2008. 4. Health Foundation. Looking for value in hard times. London: Health Foundation; 2012. 5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Supporting investment in public health: Review of methods for assessing cost effectiveness, cost impact and return on investment. London: NICE; 2011. 6. Health Foundation. Perspectives on context. A selection of essays considering the role of context in successful quality improvement. London: Health Foundation; 2014. 7. Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the systems around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 307–10. doi: 10.1136/ qshc.2005.016527 8. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications Inc; 1997. 9. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 1991; 17: 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108 10. Barney J, Clarke D. Resource Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. 11. Rosner M. Economic Determinants of Organizational Innovation. Adm Sci Q 1968; 12: 614–25. doi: 10.2307/2391536 12. Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G. Organizing for Quality: the improvement journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2008. 13. Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 2007; 28: 1319–50. doi: 10.1002/ smj.640 14. Bierly PE, Damanpour F, Santoro MD. The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation. Journal of Management Studies 2009; 46: 481–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00829.x 15. Newbert SL. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal 2007; 28: 121–46. doi: 10.1002/ smj.573 16. Lockett A, Thompson S, Morgenstern U. The development of the resource-based view of the firm: a critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews 2009; 11: 9–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00252.x 17. Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton CR, Harvey G, McCormack B, Graham I, et al. Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013; 18: 13–26. doi: 10.1177/1355819613498859 18. Propper C. Competition, incentives and the English NHS. Health Econ 2012; 21: 33–40. doi: 10.1002/hec.1804 19. Ferlie E, Ashburner L, Fitzgerald L, Pettigrew A. The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. 20. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Healthcare: Creating Value-based Competition on Results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2006. 21. McCLure ML, Poulin MA, Sovie MD, Wandelt MA. Magnet hospitals: attraction and retention of professional nurses. Kansas City: American Academy of Nurses; 1983. 22. Doran T, Roland M. Lessons from Major Initiatives to Improve Primary Care in the United Kingdom. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29: 1023–9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0069 |
---|