1. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.
J Manag 1991;17:99–120.
2. Barney J, Clarke D. Resource based theory: creating and sustaining
competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
3. Lockett A. Edith Penrose’s legacy to the resource-based view.
Manage Decis Econ 2005;26:83–98.
4. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic
management. Strateg Manag J 1997;18:509–33.
5. Ambrosini V, Bowman C. What are dynamic capabilities and are they
a useful construct in strategic management? Inter J Manag Rev
6. Newbert SL. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the
firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strat
Manag J 2007;28:121–46.
7. Lockett A, Thompson S, Morgenstern U. The development of the
resource-based view of the firm: a critical appraisal. Inter J Manag
8. Kraaijenbrink J, Spender J, Groen AJ. The Resource-Based View:
a review and assessment of its critiques. J Manag 2010;36:349–72.
9. Propper C. Competition, incentives and the English NHS. Health
10. Ferlie E, Ashburner L, FitzGerald L, et al. The new public
management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
11. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining healthcare: creating value-based
competition on results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
12. McCLure ML, Poulin MA, Sovie MD, et al. Magnet hospitals:
attraction and retention of professional nurses. Kansas City:
American Academy of Nurses, 1983.
13. Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G. Organizing for quality: the improvement
journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States.
Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd, 2008.
14. Doran T, Roland M. Lessons from major initiatives to improve
primary care in the United Kingdom. Health Aff 2010;29:1023–9.
15. Whittington R. What is strategy, and does it matter? London:
Cengage Learning, 2001.
16. Rosner M. Economic determinants of organizational innovation. Adm
Sci Q 1968;12:614–25.
17. Teece DJ. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and
microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat
Manag J 2007;28:1319–50.
18. Bierly PE, Damanpour F, Santoro MD. The application of external
knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation.
J Manag Stud 2009;46:481–509.
19. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a
new method for characterising and designing behaviour change
interventions. Improv Sci 2011;6:42.
20. Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, et al. What counts as
evidence in evidence-based practice? J Adv Nurs 2004;47:81–90.
21. Scott A, Skea J, Robinson J, et al. Designing ‘interactive’
environmental research for wider social relevance. Special Briefing
No. 4, ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme, 1999.
22. Novotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking science. Knowledge and
the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
23. Greve CH. Organisational learning from performance feedback.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
24. Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the
systems around the patient to co-designing services with the patient.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:307–10.
25. Checkland P. Soft systems methodology. A thirty year retrospective.
Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999.
26. Dopson S, Fitzgerald L. Knowledge to action? Evidence-based
health care in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
27. Checkland P. Systems thinking. Systems practice. Chichester: John
Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1993.
28. Kontos PC, Poland BD. Mapping new theoretical and methodological
terrain for knowledge translation: contributions from critical realism
and the arts. Implement Sci 2009;4:1.
29. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage Publications,
30. Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publications, 2008.
31. Ovretveit J, Klazinga N. Learning from large-scale quality
improvement through comparisons. Int J Qual Health Care
2012;24:463–9, (Advance access, published August 8th).
32. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C. Paying attention to context in
improvement research. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2010;7:121–2.
33. Lewin K. Defining the “field at a given time”. Psychol Rev
34. Pawson R. The science of evaluation. London: Sage Publications, 2013.
35. Ovseiko P, Heitmueller A, Davies SM, et al. Improving accountability
through alignment: the role of academic health science centres and
networks in England. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:24.
36. Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton C, et al. Implementing health
research through academic and clinical partnerships: a realistic
evaluation of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health
Research and Care (CLAHRC). Implement Sci 2011;6:74.
37. Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, et al. The impact of patient
and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.
Int J Qual Health Care 2012;24:28–38
38. Staniszeska S, Thomas V, Seers K. Patient and public involvement
in the implementation of evidence into practice. Evid Based Nurs
39. Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton C, et al. Collaborative action
around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied
Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory. J Health
Serv Res Policy 2013;18:13–26.
40. Masterson P, Burton C, Rycroft Malone J, et al. Towards a
programme theory for fidelity in the evaluation of complex
interventions: a process evaluation of the OTCH trial. J Eval Clin
41. Spradley JP. Participant observation. Orlando: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich College Publishers, 1980.
42. Hsieh H, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content
analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88.
43. Maryring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qual Soc Res
2000;1:20. Retrieved 25 January 2014. http://www.
44. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health
and social care. London: Department of Health, 2005.
45. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting
qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and
focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57.
46. Robert G, Fulop N. The role of context in successful improvement.
In: Health Foundation, eds. Perspectives on context. A selection of
essays considering the role of context in successful quality
improvement. London: Health Foundation, 2014:31.
47. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored
interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on
professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2010(3):CD005470.
48. Crilly T, Jashpara A, Trenholm S, et al. Knowledge mobilisation in
healthcare organisations: synthesising evidence and theory using
perspectives of organisational form, resource based view of the firm
and critical theory. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation