1. Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, et al. Total knee replacement: Is it really an effective procedure at all? The Knee
2007; 14: 417–423.
2. Judge A, Cooper C, Williams S, et al. Patient-reported
outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a
European collaborative study. Arthritis Care Res 2010;
3. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of
behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215.
4. Marks R. Physical and psychological correlates of disability among a cohort of individuals with knee osteoarthritis.
Can J Aging 2007; 26: 367–378.
5. Fortinsky RH, Bohannon RW, Litt MD, et al. Rehabilitation
therapy self-efficacy and functional recovery after hip fracture. Int J Rehabil Res 2002; 25: 241–246.
6. Korpershoek C, Van Der Bijl J and Hafsteinsdóttir TB.
Self-efficacy and its influence on recovery of patients
with stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67:
7. Rosenberger PH, Jokl P and Ickovics J. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature
review. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 2006; 14: 397–405.
8. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.
Am Psychol 1982; 37: 122–147.
9. Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, et al.
Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total
hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin
Arthritis Rheu 2012; 41: 576–588.
10. Haanstra TM, Van den Berg T, Ostelo RW, et al.
Systematic review: Do patient expectations influence
treatment outcomes in total knee and total hip arthroplasty? Health Qual Life Out 2012; 10: 152.
11. Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic
reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. Brit Med J
2001; 323: 224.
12. Belo JN, Berger MY, Reijman M, et al. Prognostic factors
of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic
review of observational studies. Arthritis Care Res 2007;
13. Scholten-Peeters GG, Gwendolijne GM, Verhagen AP,
et al. Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders:
a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Pain
2003; 1: 303–322.
14. Jack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, et al. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: A
systematic review. Manual Ther 2010; 15: 220–228.
15. Kuijpers T, Van der Windt D, Van der Heijden G, et al.
Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. Pain 2005; 109(3): 420–431.
16. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA
statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions:
explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: 270.
17. Landis JR and Koch GG. The measurement of observer
agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:
18. Van den Akker-Scheek I, Stevens M, Groothoff JW, et al.
Preoperative or postoperative self-efficacy: Which is a
better predictor of outcome after total hip or knee arthroplasty? Patient Educ Couns 2007; 66: 92–99.
19. Hartley SM, Vance DE, Elliott TR, et al. Hope, self-efficacy, and functional recovery after knee and hip replacement surgery. Rehabil Psychol 2008; 53: 521–529.
20. Orbell S, Johnston M, Rowley D, et al. Self-efficacy and
goal importance in the prediction of physical disability in
people following hospitalization: a prospective study. Br
J Health Psychol 2001; 6: 25–40.
21. Moon LB and Backer J. Relationships among self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and postoperative behaviors
in total joint replacement patients. Orthop Nurs 2000; 19:
22. Wylde V, Dixon S and Blom AW. The role of preoperative self-efficacy in predicting outcome after total knee
replacement. Muscoskel Care 2012; 10: 110–118.
23. Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, et al. Preoperative pain
catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 798–806.
24. Engel C, Hamilton NA, Potter PT, et al. Impact of two
types of expectancy on recovery from total knee replacement surgery (TKR) in adults with osteoarthritis. Behav
Med 2004; 30: 113–123.
25. Lopez-Olivo MA, Landon GC, Siff SJ, et al. Psychosocial
determinants of outcomes in knee replacement. Ann
Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 1775–1781.
26. Waldrop D, Lightsey OR, Ethington CA, et al. Selfefficacy, optimism, health competence and recovery
from orthopedic surgery. J Couns Psychol 2001; 48:
27. Mueller A, Hartmann M, Mueller K, et al. Validation
of the arthritis self-efficacy short form scale in German
fibromyalgia patients. Eur J Pain 2003; 7: 163–171.
28. Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, et al. Development and
evaluation of a scale to measure the perceived self-efficacy
of people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 37–44.
29. González VM, Stewart A, Ritter PL, et al. Translation
and validation of arthritis outcome measures into Spanish.
Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1429–1446.
30. Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire:
Taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 2007; 11: 153–163.
31. Oetker-Black SL and Taunton RL. Evaluation of a selfefficacy scale for preoperative patients. AORN J 1994: 60:
32. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al.
Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for
measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes toantirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of
the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–1840.
33. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation
and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold replacement.
An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51: 737–755.
34. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale of the Knee
Society Clinical Rating System. Clin Orthop Relat Res
1989; 248: 13–14.
35. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR, et al. The MOS 36-item
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data
quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse
patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66.
36. Patrick DL and Peach H (eds). Disablement in the community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
37. Radloff L. The CES–D scale: A self-report depression
scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych
Meas 1977; 1: 385–401.
38. Benyon K, Hill S, Zadurian N, et al. Coping strategies and
self-efficacy as predictors of outcome in osteoarthritis: a
systematic review. Muscoskel Care 2010; 8: 224–236.
39. Dohnke B, Knauper B and Muller-Fahrnow W. Perceived
self-efficacy gained from, and health effects of, a rehabilitation program after hip joint replacement. Arthritis
Rheum 2005; 53: 585–592.
40. Kurlowicz LH. Perceived self-efficacy, functional ability, and depressive symptoms in older elective surgery
patients. Nurs Res 1998; 47: 219–226.
41. Brady TJ. Measures of self efficacy: Arthritis Self Efficacy
Scale (ASES), Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale 8 Item (ASES
8), Children’s Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (CASE), Chronic
Disease Self Efficacy Scale (CDSES), Parent’s Arthritis Self
Efficacy Scale (PASE), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Self Efficacy
Scale (RASE). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: S473–S485.
42. Hewlett S, Cockshott Z, Kirwan J, et al. Development
and validation of a self-efficacy scale for use in British
patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RASE). Rheumatol
2001; 40: 1221–1230.
43. O’Brien S, Bennett D, Doran E, et al. Comparison of hip
and knee arthroplasty outcomes at early and intermediate
follow-up. Orthopedics 2009; 32: 170.
44. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Ibrahim S, et al. The trajectory
of recovery and the inter-relationships of symptoms, activity and participation in the first year following total hip
and knee replacement. Osteo Arthr Cartilage 2011; 19:
45. Johnston M, Bonetti D, Joice S, et al. Recovery from
disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Disabil
Rehabil 2007; 29: 1117–1127.
46. Rottmann N, Dalton SO, Christensen J, et al. Self-efficacy,
adjustment style and well-being in breast cancer patients:
a longitudinal study. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 827–836.
47. Fitzgerald JD, Orav EJ, Lee TH, et al. Patient quality of
life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Care Res 2004; 51: 100–109.
48. Gill SD, De Morton NA and McBurney H. An investigation of six measures of physical function in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee. Clin
Rehabil 2012; 26: 945–951.
49. Lindemann U, Becker C, Muche R, et al. Gait analysis
and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional
outcome in total hip replacement. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: