| Abstract | Introduction Nursing staffing levels in hospitals appear to be associated with improved patient outcomes. National guidance indicates that the triangulation of information from workforce planning and deployment technologies (WPTs; eg, the Safer Nursing Care Tool) and ‘local knowledge’ is important for managers to achieve appropriate staffing levels for better patient outcomes. Although WPTs provide managers with predictive information about future staffing requirements, ensuring patient safety and quality care also requires the consideration of information from other sources in real time. Yet little attention has been given to how to support managers to implement WPTs in practice. Given this lack of understanding, this evidence synthesis is designed to address the research question: managers’ use of WPTs and their impacts on nurse staffing and patient care: what works, for whom, how and in what circumstances? Methods and analysis To explain how WPTs may work and in what contexts, we will conduct a realist evidence synthesis through sourcing relevant evidence, and consulting with stakeholders about the impacts of WPTs on health and relevant public service fields. The review will be in 4 phases over 18 months. Phase 1: we will construct an initial theoretical framework that provides plausible explanations of what works about WPTs. Phase 2: evidence retrieval, review and synthesis guided by the theoretical framework; phase 3: testing and refining of programme theories, to determine their relevance; phase 4: formulating actionable recommendations about how WPTs should be implemented in clinical practice. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been gained from the study's institutional sponsors. Ethical review from the National Health Service (NHS) is not required; however research and development permissions will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated through stakeholder engagement and knowledge mobilisation activities. The synthesis will develop an explanatory programme theory of the implementation and impact of nursing WPTs, and practical guidance for nurse managers. Trial registration number CRD42016038132. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ View Full Text http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013645 |
|---|
| References | ↵Griffiths P, Ball J, Murrells T, et al. Registered nurse, healthcare support worked, medical staffing levels and mortality in English hospital trusts a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e008751. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008751Google Scholar
↵Chief Nursing Officer for England & National Quality Board. How to ensure the right people, with the right skills, are in the right place at the right time: a guide to nursing, midwifery and care staffing capacity and capability. 2013. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/nqb-how-to-gui... Scholar
↵The Shelford Group. Safer Nursing Care Tool. Implementation Resource Pack. The Shelford Group, 2013. http://www.nhsiq.nhs.uk/media/2760784/130719_shelford_safer_nursing_... Scholar
↵NHS England. Mental health staffing: a practical guide. Part of Compassion in Practice Programme. West Midlands: Health Education, 2015.Google Scholar
↵NHS Education for Scotland. Nursing and midwifery workload and workforce planning. Learning toolkit. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government, 2013.Google Scholar
↵Welsh Government. Fundamentals of care system. Adult acute nursing acuity and dependency tool. User guide. Welsh Government, 2015.Google Scholar
↵HHR Demonstration Project. RN/RPN utilization toolkit project. Ontario: Healthforce Ontario, 2009.Google Scholar
↵Royal College of Nursing. Guidance on safe nurse staffing levels in the UK. London: Royal College of Nursing, 2010.Google Scholar
↵Lord Carter of Coles. Operational productivity and performance in English NHS acute hospitals: unwarranted variations. An independent report for the Department of Health, 2016.Google Scholar
↵Griffiths P, Ball J, Drennan J, et al. The association between patient safety outcomes and nurse/healthcare assistant skill mix and staffing levels and factors that may influence staffing requirements. Centre for Innovation and Leadership in Health Sciences, University of Southampton, 2014.Google Scholar
↵Nurse Staffing Levels (Wales) Act (Anaw 5). Great Britain: National Assembly for Wales, 2016. http://legislation.data.gov.uk/anaw/2016/5/body/data.htm?wrap=true (accessed 22 Aug 2016).Google Scholar
↵National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Safe staffing for nursing in adult inpatient wards in acute hospitals. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/sg1Google Scholar
↵Harris A, McGillis-Hall L. Evidence to inform staff-mix decision making: a focused literature review. Ontario: Canadian Nurses Association, 2012.Google Scholar
↵Royal College of Nursing, Safe Staffing for older people's wards. RCN full report and recommendations. London: Royal College of Nursing, 2012.Google Scholar
↵West E, Barron DN, Harrison D, et al. Nurse staffing, medical staffing and mortality in intensive care: an observational study. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:781–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
↵Scott C. Setting safe nurse staffing levels. An exploration of the issues. London: Royal College of Nursing, 2003.Google Scholar
↵Imison C, Castle-Clarke S, Watson R. Reshaping the workforce to deliver the care patients need. Nuffield Trust Research Report. 2016. http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/node/4651Google Scholar
↵Proctor S. Subjectivity and objectivity in the measurement of nursing workload. J Clin Nurs 1992;1:123–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.1992.tb00082.xGoogle Scholar
↵Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
↵Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, et al. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci 2012;7:33. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
↵Wand T, White K, Patching J. Applying a realist(ic) framework to the evaluation of a new model of emergency department based mental health nursing practice. Nurs Inq 2010;17:231–9. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00488.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
↵Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist evaluation. London: Sage, 1997.Google Scholar
Malloch K, Conovaloff A. Patient classification systems, part 1: the third generation. J Nurs Adm 1999;29:49–56. doi:10.1097/00005110-199907000-00013PubMedGoogle Scholar
Van Slyck A, Johnson KR. Using patient acuity data to manage patient care outcomes and patient care costs. Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract 2001;5:36–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Allen DA. The invisible work of nurses: hospitals, organisation and healthcare. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Villarreal MC, Keskinocak P. Staff planning for operating rooms with different surgical services lines. Health Care Manag Sci 2016;19:144–69. doi:10.1007/s10729-014-9307-xGoogle Scholar
Sibbald B, Shen J, McBride A. Changing the skill-mix of the healthcare workforce. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004;9(Suppl 1):28–38. doi:10.1258/135581904322724112Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
Burke EK, De Causmaecker P, Vanden Berghe G, et al. The state of the art of nurse rostering. J Scheduling 2004;7:441–99. doi:10.1023/B:JOSH.0000046076.75950.0bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield C, Diers D, O'Brien-Pallas L, et al. Nursing staffing, nursing workload, the work environment and patient outcomes. Appl Nurs Res 2011;24:244–55. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2009.12.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Twigg DE, Duffield CM, Bremner A, et al. Impact of skill mix variations on patient outcomes following implementation of nursing hours per patient day staffing: a retrospective study. J Adv Nurs 2012;68:2710–18. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05971.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Blay N, Duffield CM, Gallagher R, et al. Methodological integrative review of the work sampling technique used in nursing workload research. J Adv Nurs 2014;70:2434–49. doi:10.1111/jan.12466Google Scholar
Boxall P, Purcell J. Strategy and human resource management. 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Working together for health: the World Health Report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006.Google Scholar
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Thompson C, Dowding D. Clinical decision making and judgement in nursing. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2009.Google Scholar
Easterby-Smith M. Disciplines of organizational learning: contributions and critiques. Hum Relations 1997;50:1085–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raelin JA. Work-based learning in practice. J Workplace Learn 1998;10:280–3. doi:10.1108/13665629810236183Google Scholar
McCormack B, Manley K, Wilson V. edsDewing J. Becoming and being active learners and creating active learning workplaces: the value of active learning. In: McCormack B, Manley K, Wilson V. eds. International practice development in nursing and healthcare. Oxford: Oxford Blackwell, 2008:273–94.Google Scholar
French B, Thomas LH, Baker P, et al. What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organisational context. Implement Sci 2009;4:28. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Seers K, et al. An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. J Clin Nurs 2004;13:913–24. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.xCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Ferlie E, Crilly T, Jashapara A, et al. Knowledge mobilization in healthcare organizations: a view from the resource-based view of the firm. Int J Health Policy Manag 2015;4:127–30. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.35Google Scholar
Crilly T, Jashapara A, Trenholm S, et al. Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations: synthesising evidence and theory using perspectives of organisational form, resource based view of the firm and critical theory. National Institute of Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme, 2013.Google Scholar
↵Nutley S, Walters I, Davies HTO. Using evidence. How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press, 2007.Google Scholar
↵Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, et al. RAMESES publication standards: realist synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2013;69:1005–22. doi:10.1111/jan.12095CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
↵Checkland P. Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley, 1999.Google Scholar
↵Booth A, Harris J, Croot E, et al. Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER). BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:118. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
↵Burton C, Rycroft-Malone J, Hall B, et al. From rhetoric to reality: stakeholders’ involvement in realist synthesis. The 1st International Conference on Realist Approaches to Evaluation and Synthesis: Successes, Challenges, and the Road Ahead. Liverpool. 2014. http://programme.exordo.com/cares2014/delegates/presentation/14/Goog... Scholar
↵Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C, Hall B, et al. Improving skills and care standards in the support workforce for older people: a realist review. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005356. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005356Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
↵Meyer SB, Lunnay B. The application of abductive and retroductive inference for the design and analysis of theory-driven sociological research. Sociological Research Online, 2012. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/18/1/12.htmlGoogle Scholar
↵Kane R, Shamlyian T, Mueller C. et al. Nurse staffing and quality of patient care. Agency for healthcare research and quality. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. No 151, 2007.Google Scholar
↵Ball JE, Murrells T, Rafferty AM, et al. “Care left undone” during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:116–25. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001767Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar |
|---|