Gender identity, research self-efficacy and research intention in trainee clinical psychologists in the UK
Wright, A. and Holttum, S. 2010. Gender identity, research self-efficacy and research intention in trainee clinical psychologists in the UK. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 19 (1), pp. 46-56.
|Authors||Wright, A. and Holttum, S.|
|Keywords||Men and women; Science and practice; Masculinity; Trainee Clinical Psychologist|
|Journal||Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy|
|Journal citation||19 (1), pp. 46-56|
|Publisher||John Wiley & Sons|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||doi:10.1002/cpp.732|
|15 Dec 2010|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||29 Jan 2013|
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator
Barres, B.A. (2006). Does gender matter? Nature, 442, 133–136.
Barrom, C.P., Shadish, W.R., & Montgomery, L.M. (1988). PhDs, PsyDs, and real-world constraints on scholarly activity:
Becker, B.J. (1989). Gender and science achievement: A reanalysis of studies from two meta-analyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 141–169.
Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S.L. (1981a). Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Palo Alto, CA:
Bem, S.L. (1981b). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
Benbow, C.P., & Lubinski, D. (1993). Psychological profi les of the mathematically talented: Some sex differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In G.R. Bock, & K. Ackrill (Eds), The origins and development of high ability. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 178 (pp. 44–66). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artefact? Science, 210, 1262–1264.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.
Block, J.H. (1984). Sex role identity and ego development. London: Jossey-Bass.
Breakwell, G.M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and
British Psychological Society. (2002). Criteria for the accreditation for postgraduate training programmes in clinical psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
British Psychological Society. (2010). Standards for doctoral programmes in clinical psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society. Retrieved March 7, 2010, from http://www.bps.org.uk/document-download-area/document-download$.cfm?...
Clearing House for Postgraduate Courses in Clinical Psychology. (2009). Equal opportunities numbers. Retrieved
Cooper, M., & Turpin, G. (2007). Clinical psychology trainees’
Eisenberg, N., Martin, C.L., & Fabes, R.A. (1996). Gender
Eke, G., Holttum, S., & Hayward, M. (in submission). Testing a Model of Research Intention among U.K. Clinical Psychologists: A Logistic Regression Analysis.
Field, A.P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Gelso, C.J. (1993). On the making of the scientist–practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 24, 468–476.
Gelso, C.J. (2006). On the making of the scientist–practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 1, 3–16.
Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
Good, J.J., Woodzicka, J.A., & Wingfi eld, L.C. (2010). The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stererotypic textbook images on science performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 132–147.
Gordon, F. (1997). Sex, gender and research supervision in
Götzfried, A., Fauvelle, M., & Stimpson, A. (2004). Women,
Grant, L., Ward, K.B., & Rong, X.L. (1987). Is there an association between gender and methods in sociological research? American Sociological Review, 52, 856–862.
Hackett, G. (1985). The role of mathematics self-effi cacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47–56.
Hackett, G., & Betz, N.E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-effi cacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261–273.
Halford, S. (2003). Gender and organisational restructuring
Hicks, C. (1995). Good researcher, poor midwife: An investigation into the impact of central trait descriptions on assumptions of professional competencies. Midwifery, 11, 81–87.
Hicks, C. (1996a). Nurse researcher: A study of contradiction in terms? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 357–363.
Hicks, C. (1996b). A study of nurses’ attitudes towards research: A factor analytic approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 373–379.
Hicks, C. (1999). Incompatible skills and ideologies: The impediment of gender attributions on nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 129–139.
Holttum, S., & Goble, L. (2006). Factors infl uencing levels of
Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., & Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-effi cacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430.
Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., & Bieschke, K.J. (1993). Predicting
Lane, D.A., & Corrie, S. (2006). The modern scientist–practitioner: A guide to practice in psychology. London: Routledge.
Larsen, R.J., & Seidman, E. (1986). Gender schema theory and sex role inventories: Some conceptual and psychometric considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 205–211.
Leong, F.T.L., & Zachar, P. (1991). Development and validation of the scientist–practitioner inventory for psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 331–341.
Mackie, M. (1985). Female sociologists’ productivity, collegial
Marzillier, J., & Hall, J. (1999). What is clinical psychology? (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, M.C., Steele, C., & Gross, J.J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.
Norcross, J.C., Karpiak, C.P., & Santoro, S.O. (2005). Clinical
Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., & Greenwald, A.G. (2002). Math =
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-effi cacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
Pajares, F. (2002). Self-effi cacy beliefs in academic contexts: An outline. Retrieved July 7, 2006, from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/efftalk.html
Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1994). The role of self-effi cacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1995). Mathematics self-effi cacy and mathematics outcomes: The need for specifi city of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198.
Pajares, F., Miller, M.D., & Johnson, M.J. (1999). Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 50–61.
Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students.
Park, S. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67, 46–84.
Schibeci, R.A. (1984). Attitudes to science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26–52.
Schunk, D.H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-effi cacy. In A. Wigfi eld, & J. Eccles (Eds),
Shibley Hyde, J., Fenneman, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L.A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299–324.
Smail, B., & Kelly, A. (1984). Sex differences in science and technology among 11-year-old school children: II. Attitudes.
Thomas, G.V., Turpin, G., & Mayer, C. (2002). Clinical research under threat. The Psychologist, 15, 286–289.
Weiner, G. (1998). Scholarship, disciplinary hegemony and power in academic publishing. Paper presented at the European Conference for Education Research, Ljubljana, Solvenia.
Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 387, 341–343.
Wigfi eld, A., Eccles, J.S., & Pintrich, P.R. (1996). Development between the ages of 11 and 25. In D.C. Berliner, & R.C. Calfee (Eds), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.148–185). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Wright, A. (2002). S.E.T. For Life! Topics: The Newspaper of the University of Bath, 127, 13.
1views this month
0downloads this month