A method and framework for video based pedagogy analysis.

Journal article

Riordan, J. 2020. A method and framework for video based pedagogy analysis. Research in Science & Technological Education . https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1776243
AuthorsRiordan, J.

Background: Bringing about conceptual change in school science classrooms is difficult for teachers. Researchers in this field have struggled to influence classroom practice.

Purpose: The present research presents a method and a framework for video-based pedagogy analysis.

Sample: Six groups of 11-year-old pupils took part (three girls and three boys) in each expert micro-teaching interview, led by a science specialist (Advanced Skills Teacher). A ‘Concurrent Verbal Protocol and Retrospective Debriefing’ interview (Taylor and Dionne, 2000) happened with the teacher approximately one month later. Six teachers and thirty-six pupils participated altogether.

Design and method: Three research methods (expert micro-teaching, verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing) were used. Data were video-recorded and managed using NVivo. About fifteen hours of video data were analysed using grounded theory methods. The interpretivist theoretical perspective (symbolic interactionism) was underpinned by a social constructionist epistemology. What can be considered evidence is inevitably affected by the researcher’s methodological position. So what constitutes reliable evidence can be contentious. Appropriate criteria for evaluating the grounded theory emerging from this study were used. Interpretivist approaches for investigating conceptual change in school science are necessary to complement positivist literature. This approach, proved successful in other fields (Pressley, 2000), is new to this context.

Results: Findings are presented as a framework for pedagogy analysis which uses the concepts: means (including information, misinformation and disinformation), strategy (on a spectrum from micro-strategies, through tactics to macro-strategies; and also involving cooperative and oppositional interactions), ends (personal, political and logistical), and accidents.

Conclusion: The method allows teachers to help the researcher understand incidents in video-data that are not evident to any external observer. The framework could help strategic dialogue between teachers, student teachers, mentors, teacher educators, and educational researchers.

KeywordsVideo-based; Pedagogy; Analysis; Conceptual change; Grounded theory
JournalResearch in Science & Technological Education
PublisherTaylor and Francis Online
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1776243
Official URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1776243
Publication dates
Online23 Jun 2020
Publication process dates
Accepted27 May 2020
Deposited02 Jul 2020
Output statusPublished

BERA. 2004. Revised Ethical Guidelines for Education Research.
Birks, M. and J. Mills. 2011. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.
Bloor, M. and F. Wood. 2006. Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts. London: Sage.
Bryant, T. and K. Charmaz. 2010. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications.
Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
Clarke, A. E. 2003. "Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn." Symbolic Interaction 26 (4): 553-576. doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553.
Clausewitz, C. von. 1982. On War. London: Penguin Classics.
Clement, J. 2013. "Roles for Explanatory Models and Analogies in Conceptual Change." In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by S. Vosniadou. Vol. 412, 412-446. Abingdon: Routledge.
Corbin, J. and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Denscombe, M. 2010. Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
diSessa, A. 2006. "A History of Conceptual Change Research: Threads and Fault Lines." In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. Sawyer, 265-282. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
Driver, R. and G. Erickson. 1983. "Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks in Science." Studies in Science Education10 (1): 37-60. doi:10.1080/03057268308559904.
Driver, R., P. Rushworth, A. Squires, and V. Wood-Robinson. 2015. Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into Children's Ideas. London: Routledge.
Duit, R. "Bibliography - STCSE: Students' and Teachers' Conceptions and Science Education.", accessed 25th September, 2017, http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/.
Duit, R., D. Treagust, and A. Widodo. 2013. "Teaching Science for Conceptual Change: Theory and Practice." In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by S. Vosniadou. 2nd ed., 487-503. New York: Routledge.
Floridi, L. 2011. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forsyth, I., A. Jolliffe, and D. Stevens. 1999. Planning a Course (Complete Guide to Teaching a Course). 2nd ed. London: Kogan Page.
Gallie, W. 1956. "Essentially Contested Concepts." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167-198.
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gehrke, N., M. Knapp, and K. Sirotnik. 1992. "In Search of the School Curriculum." Review of Research in Education 18: 51-110. doi:10.2307/1167297.
Gruber, H. and J. Vonèche. 1977. The Essential Piaget. New York: Basic Books.
Gurel, D., A. Eryılmaz, and L. McDermott. 2015. "A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science." EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 11 (5): 989-1008. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a.
Illeris, K. 2007. How we Learn: Learning and Non-Learning in School and Beyond. London: Routledge.
Kennedy, G. 1980. Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. London: Croom Helm.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford university press.
Limón, M. 2001. "On the Cognitive Conflict as an Instructional Strategy for Conceptual Change: A Critical Appraisal." Learning and Instruction 11 (4): 357-380. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2.
Lincoln, Y. and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lykke, A. 2001. "Toward an Understanding of Military Strategy." In U.S. Army War College Guide to Strategy, edited by Joseph R. Cerami and James F. Holcomb Jr., 179-186. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.
Mantzoukas, S. 2008. "A Review of Evidence‐based Practice, Nursing Research and Reflection: Levelling the Hierarchy." Journal of Clinical Nursing 17 (2): 214-223. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01912.x.
Meyer, K. and E. Woodruff. 1997. "Consensually Driven Explanation in Science Teaching." Science Education 81 (2): 173-192. doi:AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-C.
Morse, J., M. Barrett, M. Mayan, K. Olson, and J. Spiers. 2002. "Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 (2): 13-22. doi:10.1177/160940690200100202.
Özdemir, G. and D. Clark. 2007. "An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories." Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 3 (4): 351-361. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75414.
Pearson, A. 2004. "Balancing the Evidence: Incorporating the Synthesis of Qualitative Data into Systematic Reviews." JBI Reports 2 (2): 45-64. doi:10.1111/j.1479-6988.2004.00008.x.
Posner, G., K. Strike, P. Hewson, and W. Gertzog. 1982. "Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change." Science Education 66 (2): 211-227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207.
Rich, P. J. and M. Hannafin. 2009. "Video Annotation Tools." Journal of Teacher Education 60 (1): 52-67. doi:10.1177/0022487108328486.
Rosaen, C., M. Lundeberg, M. Cooper, A. Fritzen, and M. Terpstra. 2008. "Noticing Noticing." Journal of Teacher Education 59 (4): 347-360. doi:10.1177/0022487108322128.
Saltman, K. and D. Gabbard, eds. 2010. Education as Enforcement: The Militarization and Corporatization of Schools. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Scott, P., H. Asoko, and R. Driver. 1991. "Teaching for Conceptual Change: A Review of Strategies." In Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, edited by R. Duit, F. Goldberg and H. Niedderer, 310-329. Germany: University of Kiel.
Shannon, C., ed. 1993. Collected Papers, edited by N. J. A. Sloane andA. D. Wyner. Los Alamos, Calif.: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Sinatra, G. 2005. "The "Warming Trend" in Conceptual Change Research: The Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich." Educational Psychologist 40 (2): 107-115. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5.
Smith, E., T. Blakeslee, and C. Anderson. 1993. "Teaching Strategies Associated with Conceptual Change Learning in Science." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (2): 111-126. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300202.
Stahl, B. 2006. "On the Difference Or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective." Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 9: 83-96. doi:10.28945/473.
Taber, K. 2006. "Beyond Constructivism: The Progressive Research Programme into Learning Science." Studies in Science Education 42 (1): 125-184. doi:10.1080/03057260608560222.
Tamir, P., R. Gal-Choppin, and R. Nussinovitz. 1981. "How do Intermediate and Junior High School Students Conceptualize Living and Nonliving?" Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18 (3): 241-248. doi:10.1002/tea.3660180307.
Taylor, L. and J. P. Dionne. 2000. "Accessing Problem-Solving Strategy Knowledge: The Complementary use of Concurrent Verbal Protocols and Retrospective Debriefing." Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (3): 413-425. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.413.
Tripp, T. and P. Rich. 2012. "The Influence of Video Analysis on the Process of Teacher Change." Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (5): 728-739. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011.
Vosniadou, S. 2013. International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by S. Vosniadou. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge.
Vosniadou, S. and W. Brewer. 1992. "Mental Models of the Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood." Cognitive Psychology 24 (4): 535-585. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W.
Watson, R. 2003. "Scientific Methods are the Only Credible Way Forward for Nursing Research." Journal of Advanced Nursing 43 (3): 219. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02701.x-i1.
Whaley, B. 1982. "Toward a General Theory of Deception." In Military Deception and Strategic Surprise, edited by J. Gooch and A. Perlmutter, 178-192. London: Frank Cass.
Wilson, A., M. Smith, and H. Ross. 2003. "The Nature and Effects of Young Children's Lies." Social Development 12 (1): 21-45. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00220.

Additional information

• This is an original manuscript / preprint of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Research in Science & Technological Education on 23/6/20, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02635143.2020.1776243
• The embargo on publishing the ‘Accepted Manuscript’ to the university repository lasts for 18 months from publication (until 23/12/21). There is no embargo on posting this on my personal website, so the ‘Accepted Manuscript’ is available on www.john-paul.org.uk > teachers > more > research and publications.
• 50 free ePrints of the published version (i.e. the ‘version of record’) are available on request. Please just email me on john-paul.riordan@canterbury.ac.uk or DM @jpscience.

Permalink -


Restricted files

Accepted author manuscript

  • 197
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 14
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

A material-dialogic perspective on powerful knowledge and matter within a science classroom
Hardman, M., Riordan, J. and Hetherington, L. A material-dialogic perspective on powerful knowledge and matter within a science classroom. in: Hudson, B., Stolare, M., Gericke, N. and Olin-Scheller, C. (ed.) Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality across school subjects London Bloomsbury Academic.
Riordan, J. and Roberts, M. 2020. Technology. in: Soan, S. (ed.) Why do Teachers Need to Know About Diverse Learning Needs? Strengthening Professional Identity and Well-Being London Bloomsbury Academic.
NICER science and religion encounters - year 3 lesson (creation stories)
Riordan, J. 2019. NICER science and religion encounters - year 3 lesson (creation stories). Canterbury Christ Church University
Do teachers deceive?
Riordan, J. 2015. Do teachers deceive? in: Sangster, M. (ed.) Challenging Perceptions in Primary Education: Exploring Issues in Practice London Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 34-37
How might educational research into children’s ideas about light be of use to teachers?
Riordan, J. 2014. How might educational research into children’s ideas about light be of use to teachers? Physics Education. 49 (6), pp. 644-653. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/49/6/644
Techniques, tactics and strategies for conceptual change in school science
Riordan, J. 2014. Techniques, tactics and strategies for conceptual change in school science. PhD Thesis Canterbury Christ Church University School of Teacher Education and Development