A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England

Introduction: Clinical placement is an essential aspect of student radiographers’ training. The Covid-19 pandemic proved challenging for diagnostic radiography students disrupting clinical placements. This study aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on first and second year student diagnostic radiographers’ in clinical practice during the Covid-19 lockdown periods and Covid-19 waves in England.
Method: A cross-sectional online survey was used to attain quantitative attitudinal 5-point Likert and qualitative free-text response data. Descriptive and inferential statistics data analysis applied the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test. The qualitative data were thematically coded and analysed for patterns of reoccurring themes.

Results: There were n=85 responses from n=9 different counties within England. Students reported missing between n=1-14 weeks of placement. There was a lack of (41%; n=35) or limited radiography staff (21%; n=18) in the clinical departments and a lack of a range of X-ray examinations available (67%; n=57) during the Covid-19 lockdowns, which affected completing practice assessments. Negative effects included stress, anxiety and worry (68%; n=58); positive effects included team working (16.4%; n=14), learning to work under pressure (12.9%; n=11), and preparation for qualifying (8.2%; n=7).

Conclusions: This study identified that students needed more support in this critical aspect of their training. There were both positive and negative responses; notably, the results highlight how the Covid-19 lockdowns have strained the National Health Service (NHS) and adversely affected radiography students.

Implications for Practice: The findings underscore the need for university educators and student liaison radiographers within hospitals to have an awareness of the mental health and practical learning needs of the students they are instructing post-Covid-19 lockdown.

1. Price B. Improving nursing students’ experience of clinical placements. Nursing Standard 2019;34(9):43–9. Doi: 10.7748/ns.2019.e11328.
2. Health Education England. Student Support Guidance during COVID-19 Outbreak. V1.0 , London; 2020.
3. Medical Schools Council. Statement on clinical placements, London; 2020.
4. Munro C., Burke J., Allum W., Mortensen N. Covid-19 leaves surgical training in crisis. BMJ 2021:n659. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.n659.
5. World Health Organisation. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public, 2020.
6. Cabinet Office. Staying alert and safe (social distancing), London; 2020.
7. Health Education England. Report on ‘Impact of COVID-19 on Students’ Survey – Key Findings, London; 2021.
8. Strudwick RM., Cushen-Brewster N., Doolan C., Driscoll-Evans P. An evaluation of the experiences of academics and practice educators who supported radiography students working on the temporary HCPC register during the COVID-19 pandemic. Radiography 2021;27(4):1179–84. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.001.
9. Cushen-Brewster N., Strudwick RM., Doolan C., Driscoll–Evans P. An evaluation of the experiences of radiography students working on the temporary HCPC register during the COVID-19 pandemic. Radiography 2021;27(4):1000–5. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.03.003.
10. Akudjedu TN., Lawal O., Sharma M., Elliott J., Stewart S., Gilleece T., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiography practice: findings from a UK radiography workforce survey. BJR|Open 2020;2(1):20200023. Doi: 10.1259/bjro.20200023.
11. Ofori-Manteaw BB., Dzidzornu E., Akudjedu TN. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical radiography education: Perspective of students and educators from a low resource setting. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022;53(1):51–7. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.11.002.
12. Akudjedu TN., Mishio NA., Elshami W., Culp MP., Lawal O., Botwe BO., et al. The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical radiography practice: A systematic literature review and recommendations for future services planning. Radiography 2021;27(4):1219–26. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.004.
13. Rainford LA., Zanardo M., Buissink C., Decoster R., Hennessy W., Knapp K., et al. The impact of COVID-19 upon student radiographers and clinical training. Radiography 2021;27(2):464–74. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.10.015.
14. Solís-Barquero SM., Rodríguez Valerio MP., McNulty JP., Riquelme Contreras PF., Ríos J., González H., et al. The impact of COVID-19 upon student radiographers and clinical training in Latin America. Radiography 2022;28(4):933–42. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.06.003.
15. Tay YX., Sng LH., Chow HC., Zainuldin MR. Clinical placements for undergraduate diagnostic radiography students amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore: Preparation, challenges and strategies for safe resumption. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2020;51(4):560–6. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.08.012.
16. Teo LW., Pang T., Ong YJ., Lai C. Coping with COVID-19: Perspectives of Student Radiographers. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2020;51(3):358–60. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.05.004.
17. Lawson Jones G., York H., Lawal O., Cherrill R., Mercer S., McCarthy Z. The experience of diagnostic radiography students during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic – a cross‐sectional study. J Med Radiat Sci 2021;68(4):418–25. Doi: 10.1002/jmrs.544.
18. Courtier N., Brown P., Mundy L., Pope E., Chivers E., Williamson K. Expectations of therapeutic radiography students in Wales about transitioning to practice during the Covid-19 pandemic as registrants on the HCPC temporary register. Radiography 2021;27(2):316–21. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.09.001.
19. Astirbadi D., Lockwood P. COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students. Radiography 2022;28(2):553–9. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.009.
20. Institute for Government. Timeline of UK government coronavirus lockdowns and restrictions, London; 2021.
21. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd ed., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States : SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2010.
22. Microsoft 365. Forms 2022 v18.2210.1203.0. Washington, USA.
23. UK Government. The Data Protection Act 2018: Chapter 2 The GDPR. , England: UK Government; 2018.
24. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). SPSS Statistics 2020 v27.0.1.0, New York, USA.
25. Caulfield J. How to do thematic analysis: a step-by-step guide & examples. Scibbr. Available from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/#:~:text=Thematic%20analysis%20is%20a%20method,meaning%20that%20come%20up%20repeatedly [accessed November 1, 2022].
26. Microsoft 365. Excel 2022 v2209. Washington, USA.
27. QSR International. NVivo 2018 v12.6.1.970 Pro.Burlington, USA.
28. Tay YX., Wei Y-M., Aw LP., Lai C. The strategy to develop newly joined radiographers in a COVID-19 world: a curated orientation programme. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2021;52(3):345–9. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.10.006.
29. Health and Care Professions Council. Covid-19 advice for students, London; 2021.
30. Atakro CA., Armah E., Menlah A., Garti I., Addo SB., Adatara P., et al. Clinical placement experiences by undergraduate nursing students in selected teaching hospitals in Ghana. BMC Nurs 2019;18(1):1. Doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0325-8.
31. Tay YX., Cai S., Chow HC., Lai C. The needs and concerns of clinical educators in radiography education in the face of COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2021;52(1):3–8. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.10.004.
32. NHS England. We Are The NHS: People Plan 2020/21-action for us all, London; 2020.
33. Negri E., la Vecchia C. A survey on the frequency of COVID-19-like symptoms on students and staff of the University of Milan. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2021;30(3):282–4. Doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000609.
34. Umakanthan S., Sahu P., Ranade A v., Bukelo MM., Rao JS., Abrahao-Machado LF. Origin, transmission, diagnosis and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Postgrad Med J 2020;96(1142):753–8. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138234.