Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination

Journal article

Langfield, H and Lockwood, P. 2023. Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination. Radiography Open. 9 (1), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5354

Publication dates
Authors	Langfield, H and Lockwood, P.
Abstract	Introduction: A patient having a chest X-ray will inevitably be exposed to radiation from the primary beam. Using a light beam diaphragm (LBD) on the X-ray tube reduces scattered radiation at the X-ray tube through longitudinal and horizontal collimation. But not scattered secondary radiation resulting from interactions of the primary beam. This study aimed to investigate whether lead protection on simulated hospital ward inpatients (opposite and adjacent to a simulated chest X-ray examination) would change the secondary scattered radiation dose received. Method: Two rando phantoms (simulated patients) were positioned at different distances from the simulated patient receiving the chest X-ray. The phantoms were positioned one metre adjacent (either side of the phantom being X-rayed) and two metres opposite. The scattered radiation dose to radiosensitive organs (thyroid, breast, and gonads) was recorded using Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs). Six exposures were conducted, three with lead protection and three without. The mean radiation dose and standard deviation were compared using a paired two-sample t-test for statistical significance (p>0.05). Results: The lead protection reduced the radiation dose to the radiosensitive organs by 64%-100% (p=0.51-0.18) one metre adjacent and 65%-100% (p=0.65-0.18) two metres opposite. Noticeably the phantom two metres opposite had substantial individual organ dose reductions due to the distance from the primary beam. Conclusion: Lead aprons, thyroid collars, and distance reduced the radiation dose to the radiosensitive organs of the surrounding phantoms (simulated patients) from an adjacent chest X-ray examination and present opportunities for dose reduction techniques during ward chest X-ray examinations.
Keywords	Chest x-ray; Dose; Radiation; Radiography
Year	2023
Journal	Radiography Open
Journal citation	9 (1), pp. 1-14
Publisher	Oslo Met
ISSN	2387-3345
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)	https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5354
Official URL	https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/article/view/5354/4625
Print	26 Jul 2023
Publication process dates
Accepted	13 Jun 2023
Deposited	27 Jul 2023
Accepted author manuscript	File Access Level Restricted
Publisher's version	5354-ny-template (1).pdf License CC BY 4.0 File Access Level Open
Output status	Published
References	1. UK Government. The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017. UK Statutory Instruments; 2017. 2. Hayre C, Bungay H, Jeffery C, Cobb C, Atutornu J. Can placing lead-rubber inferolateral to the light beam diaphragm limit ionising radiation to multiple radiosensitive organs? Radiography. 2018;24(1):15-21. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2017.09.002 3. Roser P, Zhong X, Birkhold A, et al. Simultaneous Estimation of X-Ray Back-Scatter and Forward-Scatter Using Multi-task Learning. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, October 4–8, Proceedings, Part II 23 . ; 2020:199-208. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_20 4. Boone MN, Vlassenbroeck J, Peetermans S, van Loo D, Dierick M, van Hoorebeke L. Secondary radiation in transmission-type X-ray tubes: Simulation, practical issues and solution in the context of X-ray microtomography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2012;661(1):7-12. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.09.046 5. Shaw DJ, Crawshaw I, Rimmer SD. Effects of tube potential and scatter rejection on image quality and effective dose in digital chest X-ray examination: An anthropomorphic phantom study. Radiography. 2013;19(4):321-325. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2013.07.007 6. Cho PK. Distribution of the Scatter Ray on Chest X-ray Examinations. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2012;12(7):255-260. doi:10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.07.255 7. Oh HJ, Kim SS, Kim YI, et al. A study on the directional dependence of scatter ray in radiography. Journal of radiological science and technology . 1995;18(1):63-67. 8. Geleijns J, Schultze Kool LJ, Zoetelief J, Zweers D, Broerse JJ. Image Quality and Dosimetric Aspects of Chest X Ray Examinations: Measurements with Various Types of Phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1993;49(1-3):83-88. doi:10.1093/rpd/49.1-3.83 9. Veldkamp WJH, Kroft LJM, Boot M v., Mertens BJA, Geleijns J. Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(2):333-341. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2887-6 10. Ma WK, Hogg P, Tootell A, et al. Anthropomorphic chest phantom imaging – The potential for dose creep in computed radiography. Radiography. 2013;19(3):207-211. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2013.04.002 11. Al-Murshedi S, Hogg P, England A. Relationship between body habitus and image quality and radiation dose in chest X-ray examinations: A phantom study. Physica Medica. 2019;57:65-71. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.009 12. Burrage JW, Rampant PL, Beeson BP. Scatter and transmission doses from several pediatric X-ray examinations in a nursery. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(10):704-708. doi:10.1007/s00247-003-0999-1 13. Trinh AM, Schoenfeld AH, Levin TL. Scatter radiation from chest radiographs: is there a risk to infants in a typical NICU? Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40(5):704-707. doi:10.1007/s00247-009-1474-4 14. UK Government. The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 . UK Government; 2017. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/1075/schedule/3/made 15. McVey G, Weatherburn H. A study of scatter in diagnostic X-ray rooms. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(913):28-38. doi:10.1259/bjr/93969091 16. Simpkin DJ, Dixon RL. Secondary Shielding Barriers for Diagnostic X-Ray Facilities. Health Phys. 1998;74(3):350-365. doi:10.1097/00004032-199803000-00008 17. Landauer. ⅛" x ⅛" x 0.15" TLD-100H . TLD chip: single point radiation assessments. Published 2022. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://www.landauer.co.uk/produit/tld-chip-single-point-radiation-a... 18. Carbolite Gero. TLD/3 Rapid Cooling Oven . Accessed October 10, 2022. https://www.carbolite-gero.com/products/ovens/industrial-ovens/tld-r... 19. Vosper M. Dosimetry 13.6-13.11 . In: A. Ramlaul, ed. Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research: Skills and Strategies. Springer International Publishing AG ; 2020:243-251. 20. Siemens Healthineers AG. X-ray tube Opti 150/30/50HC-100. Published online 2009. 21. Saint-Gobain crystals and detectors. Thermo Fisher WinREMS software (v.PL-26732.8.1.0.0) . Published online 2012. 22. Thermo Electron Corporation. Thermo Fisher Scientific Harshaw TLD Model 5500 Reader with WinREMS Operator’s Manual (5500-0-S-0399-001-S1) .; 2005. 23. Stratakis J, Papadakis A. Chapter 1 Dosimetry. In: Radiation Dose Management of Pregnant Patients, Pregnant Staff and Paediatric Patients. IOP Publishing; 2019. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://iopscience.iop.org/chapter/978-0-7503-1317-9/bk978-0-7503-13... 24. Corredor CE. Dose Analysis by Radiation Treatment Planning System (TPS) Software Vs. Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Output. University of Tennessee ; 2004. 25. Bos AJJ. High sensitivity thermoluminescence dosimetry. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2001;184(1-2):3-28. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00717-0 26. Thermo Electron Corporation. Thermo Fisher Scientific Harshaw TLD Model 5500 Reader with WinREMS Operator’s Manual (5500-W-O-0805-006). .; 2005. 27. Hanna DW. Development and Optimization of a Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD) Analyser System for Low-Dose Measurements Utilizing Photon Counting Techniques. Kansas State University; 1979. 28. Alderson SW, Lanzl LH, Rollins M, Spira J. An instrumented phantom system for analog computation of treatment plans. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1962;87:185-195. 29. AGFA Healthcare. NX3.0 Muscia Acquisition Workstation, AGFA DX-D 40C cassette 43x35cm. Published online 2015. 30. Winslow JF, Hyer DE, Fisher RF, Tien CJ, Hintenlang DE. Construction of anthropomorphic phantoms for use in dosimetry studies. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(3):195-204. doi:10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2986 31. Adam Rouilly. AR10A anthropomorphic X-ray/Radiographic positioning Doll. Published online 2020. Accessed May 27, 2023. https://www.adam-rouilly.co.uk/products/clinical-skills-simulators/x... 32. ProtecX Medical. One-Piece Regular Lead Apron 0.25 Equivalence. ProtecX Medical . Published 2018. Accessed November 11, 2022. https://www.protecx.co.uk/shop/essential-tailored/ 33. ProtecX Medical. Thyroid Collar 0.35 Lead Equivalence. ProtecX Medical. Published 2018. Accessed November 11, 2022. https://www.protecx.co.uk/shop/thyroid-collar/ 34. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP . 2007;103. 35. Lockwood P, Mitchell M. An assessment of the dose and image quality difference between AP and PA positioned adult radiographic knee examinations. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023;54(1):123-134. doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2022.12.004 36. Microsoft 365. Excel. Published online 2022. 37. Marshall G, Jonker L. An introduction to inferential statistics: A review and practical guide. Radiography. 2011;17(1):e1-e6. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2009.12.006 38. Flinton DM, Malamateniou C. Quantitative Methods and Analysis. In: Ramlaul A, ed. Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research: Skills and Strategies. 2nd ed. Springer; 2020:273-322. 39. Lakhwani OP, Dalal V, Jindal M, Nagala A. Radiation protection and standardization. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(4):738-743. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2018.08.010 40. Xie Z, Liao X, Kang Y, Zhang J, Jia L. Radiation Exposure to Staff in Intensive Care Unit with Portable CT Scanner. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1-4. doi:10.1155/2016/5656480 41. Linet MS, Kim KP, Miller DL, Kleinerman RA, Simon SL, de Gonzalez AB. Historical Review of Occupational Exposures and Cancer Risks in Medical Radiation Workers. Radiat Res. 2010;174(6b):793-808. doi:10.1667/RR2014.1 42. Martin CJ. A review of radiology staff doses and dose monitoring requirements. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009;136(3):140-157. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncp168 43. Oyar O, Kislalioglu A. How protective are the lead aprons we use against ionizing radiation. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. Published online 2011. doi:10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4526-11.1 44. Cupitt JM, Vinayagam S, McConachie I. Radiation exposure of nurses on an intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(2):183-183. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01870.x 45. UK Government. Ionising Radiation: Dose Comparisons. Ionising Radiation: Dose Comparisons. Published March 18, 2011. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ionising-radiation-dose-c... 46. Hayre CM, Bungay H, Jeffery C. How effective are lead-rubber aprons in protecting radiosensitive organs from secondary ionizing radiation? Radiography. 2020;26(4):e264-e269. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2020.03.013 47. Johansen S, Hauge IHR, Hogg P, et al. Are Antimony-Bismuth Aprons as Efficient as Lead Rubber Aprons in Providing Shielding against Scattered Radiation? J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2018;49(2):201-206. doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2018.02.002 48. Cheon BK, Kim CL, Kim KR, et al. Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management. Korean J Pain. 2018;31(4):244-252. doi:10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.244 49. Mitchell EL, Furey P. Prevention of radiation injury from medical imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1):22S-27S. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.139 50. Balonov MI, Shrimpton PC. Effective dose and risks from medical x-ray procedures. Ann ICRP. 2012;41(3-4):129-141. doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.002 51. Goldhill DR, McNarry AF, Hadjianastassiou VG, Tekkis PP. The longer patients are in hospital before Intensive Care admission the higher their mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(10):1908-1913. doi:10.1007/s00134-004-2386-2 52. Menéndez R, Cremades MJ, Martínez-Moragón E, Soler JJ, Reyes S, Perpiñá M. Duration of length of stay in pneumonia: influence of clinical factors and hospital type. European Respiratory Journal. 2003;22(4):643-648. doi:10.1183/09031936.03.00026103

Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/95290/investigating-the-adjacent-patient-radiation-dose-received-during-a-simulated-ward-chest-x-ray-examination

Download files

Publisher's version

	5354-ny-template (1).pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

116
total views
64
total downloads
8
views this month
1
downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England

Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Shaw, T. and Woznitza, N. 2024. A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England. Radiography Open. 10 (1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5635

Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality

Lockwood, P. and Wenman, A. 2024. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality. Radiography. 30 (2), pp. 574-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.013

Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence

Tamburrini, N. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.11.006

Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature

Hammond, C and Lockwood, P. 2023. Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.020

Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review

Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Woznitza, N. and Shaw, T. 2023. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research. 23 (1270), pp. 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10161-y

Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey

Gibson, C. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey . Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.005

Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications

Lockwood, P. 2023. Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications. Insights into Imaging. Spring (7), pp. 39-45.

An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom

Mitchell, M. and Lockwood, P. 2023. An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 29 (3), pp. 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.02.015

Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review

Lockwood, P. 2022. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review. York University.

Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination

Welborn, D. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination. Radiography. 28 (2), pp. 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.013

Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction

Faulkner, R. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction . Radiography Open. 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5004

Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired.

Nolan-Bryant, A. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.008

A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England

Hinds, Z. and Lockwood, P. 2022. A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.006

Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays

Lockwood, P. and Khan, A. 2021. Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays. Radiography Open. 7 (1), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4529

Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers

Lockwood, P. 2021. Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers. PhD Thesis Canterbury Christ Church University School of Allied and Public Health Professions

COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students

Astirbadi, D. and Lockwood, P. 2021. COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.009

Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs

Lockwood, P. and Pittock, L. 2019. Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.04.013

Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy

Lockwood, P., Elliott, J., Nelson, A. and Harris, S. 2019. Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy . BJR Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20190076

Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students

Lockwood, P. and Blackman, A. 2019. Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.012

An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom

Lockwood, P. 2019. An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 26 (2), pp. 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.001

Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module

Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.05.009

Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients

Hopkinson, G., Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.01.001

Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module

Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.11.007

CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme

Lockwood, P. 2017. CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 46 (4). https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160440

Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers

Lockwood, P. 2017. Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers. Journal of Social Science & Allied Health Professions. 1 (1), pp. 20-27.

Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting

Lockwood, P. 2017. Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 48 (1), pp. 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.001

Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective

Lockwood, P. 2016. Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 47 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.12.083

An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice.

Lockwood, P. 2016. An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.09.004

Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study

Lockwood, P., Pittock, L., Lockwood, C., Jeffery, C. and Piper, K. 2015. Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study. Radiography. 2015, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.06.005

Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination

Download files

Publisher's version

116

64

8

1

Export as

Related outputs