From the ‘what, so what, now what’ to the ‘what works, for who and why?’

Journal article

Lockwood, P. 2024. From the ‘what, so what, now what’ to the ‘what works, for who and why?’ . Radiography Open. 10 (1), pp. i-Vii. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.6136

Publication dates
Authors	Lockwood, P.
Abstract	Editorial.
Keywords	Radiography research
Year	2024
Journal	Radiography Open
Journal citation	10 (1), pp. i-Vii
Publisher	Oslo Met
ISSN	2387-3345
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)	https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.6136
Official URL	https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/article/view/6136/5095
Related URL	https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/index
Print	05 Jan 2025
Publication process dates
Accepted	12 Dec 2024
Deposited	08 Jan 2025
Accepted author manuscript	File Access Level Restricted
Publisher's version	6136ny_template.pdf License CC BY 4.0 File Access Level Open
Output status	Published
References	1. Sanderud A. Publication activities among the radiography sector in Norway. Radiography Open. 2014;1:4. 2. Fridell K, Ekberg J. Looking into the crystal ball – Swedish radiology 2025. A qualitative study of possible future scenarios. Radiography Open. 2015;2:15–29. 3. Meincke L, Dimitar IR, Eriksen R, Lauridsen CA. MR imaging of scaphoid fractures. Fat-saturated T2-weighted and Short tau inversion recovery images. Radiography Open. 2017;3:11. 4. Singh VH, Pradhan H. Neonatal chest radiography - Comparing image quality and dose for contact-techniques vs. under-tray techniques. Radiography Open. 2015;2:65–82. 5. Guðjónsdóttir J. The unnecessary dose behind cropped radiographs. Radiography Open. 2019;5:10. 6. Chanderballi R. Medical Imaging in Guyana, development and status. Radiography Open. 2019;5:12. 7. Konstantinidis K, Apostolakis I. Investigation of RIS/PACS Information Systems’ Incorporation in Greek Public Hospitals. Radiography Open. 2020;6:32–44. 8. Ding S, Weber N, Oppliger A. Microorganism identification and environmental cleaning effectiveness in radiology settings: cross-sectional and experimental studies. Radiography Open. 2020;6:1–12. 9. Ayapaneni DR, Srikonda S, Nerella KT, Reddy LP. Anatomical variations of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Radiography Open. 2021;7:54–60. 10. Muñoz C, Silencio A, Larico I. Analysis of the iodine distribution map in patients with diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Initial results. Radiography Open. 2021;7:21–33. 11. Celi Simbaña SS, Andrade Mora DS, Mendoza Benalcázar JE. Accessory spleen. A diagnostic challenge. Case Study. Radiography Open. 2022;8:70–5. 12. Udaka T, Nishiyama T, Ohtsuka T, Watanabe N, Endou I, Yoshida O, et al. Transomental hernias: Multi-detector row computed tomography findings in 15 clinical cases. Radiography Open. 2022;8:61–9. 13. Khan A, Lockwood P. Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays. Radiography Open. 2021;7:1–13. 14. Fiagbedzi E, Gorleku PN, Nyarko S, Frimpong B, Adjei A, Nkrumah A. Perception of final year radiography students towards the proposed six-year Doctor of Radiography/Medical Imaging program. Radiography Open. 2022;8:51–60. 15. Gbande P, Tchaou M, Dagbe M, Bode Atcha M, Sonhaye L, Agoda-Koussema LK, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary computed tomography angiography protocols: A multicenter audit in Togo. Radiography Open. 2023;9:60–75. 16. Skalmerås MM, Ellingbø E, Rusandu A. Valg av modalitet ved karundersøkelser: CTA vs. MRA. Radiography Open. 2021;7:34–53. 17. Anjan Dangal, Maharjan S. Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal. Radiography Open. 2023;9:1–7. 18. Zarb F. Radiographer education, research, and practice (RERP): 2021-2031. European Federation of Radiographer Societies [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Dec 12];1–17. Available from: https://api.efrs.eu/api/assets/posts/275 19. Saunders M. Research methods for business students. Person Education Limited. 2009; 20. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Bmj. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 1996. p. 71–2. 21. Abrantes A, Ribeiro LP V, da Silva CA, England A, Azevedo KB, Almeida RPP, et al. Evidence-based radiography: a new methodology or the systematisation of an old practice? Radiography. 2020;26:127–32. 22. Al Balushi H, Watts H, Akudjedu TN. Research and evidence-based practice in clinical radiography: A systematic review of barriers and recommendations for a new direction. Radiography. 2024;30:538–59. 23. Di Michele L, Thomson K, McEntee MF, Kenny B, Reed W. Knowledge translation: Radiographers compared to other healthcare professionals. Radiography. 2020;26:S27–32. 24. Hafslund B, Clare J, Graverholt B, Wammen Nortvedt M. Evidence-based radiography. Radiography. 2008;14:343–8. 25. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. The lancet. 2003;362:1225–30. 26. French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science. 2012;7:38. 27. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12-3. 28. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging. Medical Decision Making. 1991;11:88–94. 29. Gazelle GS, Kessler L, Lee DW, McGinn T, Menzin J, Neumann PJ, et al. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research. Radiology. 2011;261:692–8. 30. Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH, Haynes RB, Drummond M. A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ. 1986;134:587–94. 31. Bauer MS, Kirchner J. Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112376. 32. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to Implementation Science. Implementation Science. 2006;1:1. 33. Palm R, Hochmuth A. What works, for whom and under what circumstances? Using realist methodology to evaluate complex interventions in nursing: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;109:103601. 34. Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:189. 35. Kaplan HC, Walsh KE. Context in implementation science. Pediatrics. 2022;149. 36. Drennan D. Transforming company culture: Getting your company from where you are now to where you want to be. 1st ed. London: McGraw-Hill; 1992. 37. Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS Framework—A Framework for Guiding the Implementation of Evidence-based Practice. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19:297–304. 38. Bergström A, Ehrenberg A, Eldh AC, Graham ID, Gustafsson K, Harvey G, et al. The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice—a citation analysis of the literature. Implementation Science. 2020;15:68. 39. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science. 2009;4:50. 40. McCormack B, McCarthy G, Wright J, Coffey A, Slater P. Development of the Context Assessment index (CAI). [Internet]. Ulster; 2008. Available from: https://www.ualberta.ca/nursing/media-library/knowledge-utilization-... 41. Wilson V, Dewing J, Cardiff S, Mekki TE, Øye C, McCance T. A person-centred observational tool: devising the Workplace Culture Critical Analysis Tool®. International Practice Development Journal. 2020;10:1–15. 42. Hersey P, Blanchard KH. Management of Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Journal. 1969;12:526–526. 43. Foundation of Nursing Studies. Situational Facilitation Matrix [Internet]. Activity-2-Situational-Facilitation-Matrix. 2010 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.fons.org/resources/documents/Creating-Caring-Cultures/Ac... 44. Foundation of Nursing Studies. Situational Facilitation 8-10 characteristics [Internet]. Activity-1-Situational-Facilitation-Characteristics. 2015 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.fons.org/resources/documents/Creating-Caring-Cultures/Ac... 45. Harvey G, Loftus-Hills A, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Kitson A, McCormack B, et al. Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37:577–88. 46. Shaw T, Dewing J, Young R, Devlin M, Boomer C, Legius M. Enabling Practice Development: Delving into the concept of facilitation from a practitioner perspective. In: Manley K, McCormack B, Wilson V, editors. International Practice Development in Nursing and Healthcare [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. p. 147–69. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781444319491 47. Titchen A, Dewing J, Manley K. Getting Going with Facilitation Skills in Practice Development. In: McCormack B, Manley K, Titchen A, editors. Practice Development in Nursing and Healthcare. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 109–29.

Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/99zyz/from-the-what-so-what-now-what-to-the-what-works-for-who-and-why

Download files

Publisher's version

	6136ny_template.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

13
total views
2
total downloads
9
views this month
1
downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

An implementation facilitation intervention to improve the musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting by radiographers across London

Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Shaw, T., Woznitza, N., Compton, E., Groombridge, H., Hayes, N., Mane, U., O'Brien, A. and Patterson, S. 2025. An implementation facilitation intervention to improve the musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting by radiographers across London. BMC Health Services Research. 25 (248), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12356-x

Systematic screening for active tuberculosis amongst refugees and asylum seekers in Western Europe: Is universal chest radiography justified? A literature review.

Dooley, N and Lockwood, P. 2024. Systematic screening for active tuberculosis amongst refugees and asylum seekers in Western Europe: Is universal chest radiography justified? A literature review. Radiography. 31 (1), pp. 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.11.011

Student radiographers’ knowledge and experience of lateral hip X-ray positioning: A survey

Clarke, L. and Lockwood, P. 2024. Student radiographers’ knowledge and experience of lateral hip X-ray positioning: A survey. Radiography. 30 (6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.08.011

The role of imaging in the diagnosis of potential air pollution related illness: a narrative review

Abigail Taylor and Paul Lockwood 2024. The role of imaging in the diagnosis of potential air pollution related illness: a narrative review. Radiography. 30 (5), pp. 1326-1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.014

A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England

Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Shaw, T. and Woznitza, N. 2024. A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England. Radiography Open. 10 (1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5635

Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality

Lockwood, P. and Wenman, A. 2024. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality. Radiography. 30 (2), pp. 574-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.013

Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence

Tamburrini, N. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.11.006

Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature

Hammond, C and Lockwood, P. 2023. Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.020

Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review

Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Woznitza, N. and Shaw, T. 2023. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research. 23 (1270), pp. 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10161-y

Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey

Gibson, C. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey . Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.005

Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination

Langfield, H and Lockwood, P. 2023. Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination. Radiography Open. 9 (1), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5354

Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications

Lockwood, P. 2023. Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications. Insights into Imaging. Spring (7), pp. 39-45.

An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom

Mitchell, M. and Lockwood, P. 2023. An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 29 (3), pp. 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.02.015

Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review

Lockwood, P. 2022. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review. York University.

Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination

Welborn, D. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination. Radiography. 28 (2), pp. 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.013

Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction

Faulkner, R. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction . Radiography Open. 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5004

Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired.

Nolan-Bryant, A. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.008

A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England

Hinds, Z. and Lockwood, P. 2022. A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.006

Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays

Lockwood, P. and Khan, A. 2021. Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays. Radiography Open. 7 (1), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4529

Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers

Lockwood, P. 2021. Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers. PhD Thesis Canterbury Christ Church University School of Allied and Public Health Professions

COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students

Astirbadi, D. and Lockwood, P. 2021. COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.009

Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs

Lockwood, P. and Pittock, L. 2019. Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.04.013

Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy

Lockwood, P., Elliott, J., Nelson, A. and Harris, S. 2019. Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy . BJR Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20190076

Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students

Lockwood, P. and Blackman, A. 2019. Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.012

An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom

Lockwood, P. 2019. An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 26 (2), pp. 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.001

Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module

Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.05.009

Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients

Hopkinson, G., Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.01.001

Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module

Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.11.007

CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme

Lockwood, P. 2017. CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 46 (4). https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160440

Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers

Lockwood, P. 2017. Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers. Journal of Social Science & Allied Health Professions. 1 (1), pp. 20-27.

Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting

Lockwood, P. 2017. Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 48 (1), pp. 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.001

Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective

Lockwood, P. 2016. Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 47 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.12.083

An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice.

Lockwood, P. 2016. An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.09.004

Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study

Lockwood, P., Pittock, L., Lockwood, C., Jeffery, C. and Piper, K. 2015. Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study. Radiography. 2015, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.06.005