An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom

Journal article


Mitchell, M. and Lockwood, P. 2023. An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 29 (3), pp. 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.02.015
AuthorsMitchell, M. and Lockwood, P.
Abstract

Introduction: Radiographers have been reporting Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examinations for over ten years, and there is an increasing body of evidence confirming the efficacy of this role expansion. However, little is known about the clinical scope of practice of radiographers undertaking this enhanced level of practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods: MRI reporting radiographers who are actively reporting within the UK were invited to participate in a short online survey investigating the anatomical areas reported, clinical referral pathways and onward referral practices they routinely undertake. The survey was distributed via social media channels with snowball sampling encouraged.

Results: There were n=14 responses received, with an estimated response rate of 21.5%. The majority(93% n=13/14) practised in England, with one response from Scotland. All participants (n=14/14)undertook reporting of general practitioner (GP) and community healthcare practitioner's referrals, with 93% reporting for outpatient referrers. There was statistically significant variation in the anatomical areas reported when compared against those qualified less than two years and those qualified over ten years(p¼0.003). No other statistically significant variation was seen.

Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in the implementation of MRI reporting by radiographers identified. All participants indicated reporting for GP and community healthcare practitioner referrers which align well with the implementation of community diagnostic centre rollout across the UK. Implication for practice: This is believed to be the first study of its kind in the realm of MRI reporting. The study has suggested that MRI reporting radiographers are well placed to contribute to the rollout of community diagnostic centres within the UK.

KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging ; Reporting; Scope of practice; Referrals; Radiographers; MRI
Year2023
JournalRadiography
Journal citation29 (3), pp. 489-495
PublisherElsevier
ISSN10788174
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.02.015
Official URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817423000500
Publication dates
Online04 Mar 2023
Publication process dates
Accepted15 Feb 2023
Deposited06 Mar 2023
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
References

1. NHS England and NHS Improvement (2022) Diagnostic Imaging Dataset Statistical Release. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/202... (Accessed: 28/12/2022)

2. Halliday, K., Maskell. G., Beeley. L. and Quick. E. (2020) Radiology GIRFT Programme National Specialty Report. Available at: https://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GIR... (Accessed: 28/12/2022)

3. The Royal College of Radiologists (2021) Clinical Radiology UK Workforce Census Report 2020, The Royal College of Radiologists. Available at: http://www.rcr.ac.uk/publications.aspx?PageID=310&PublicationID=... (Accessed: 28/12/2022).

4. Care Quality Commission (2018) Radiology review A national review of radiology reporting within the NHS in England A national review of radiology reporting within the NHS in England. Available at: https://www.cqc.org.uk/publications/themed-work/radiology-review (Accessed: 28/12/2022).

5. Department of Health (2003) ‘Radiography Skills Mix: A report on the four-tier service delivery model’, (June), pp. 1–48. Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4007123. (Accessed: 28/12/2022).

6. Woznitza, N., Pittock. L. Elliot. J. and Snaith. B. (2021) ‘Diagnostic radiographer advanced clinical practice in the United Kingdom – A national cross-sectional survey’, BJR|Open. British Institute of Radiology, 3(1). doi: 10.1259/bjro.20210003.

7. Stevens, B. J. (2019) ‘A survey assessment of reporting radiographers’ scope of practice in the West Midlands region of the United Kingdom’, Radiography, 25(3), pp. 214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.01.006.

8. Piper, K., Buscall, K. and Thomas, N. (2010) ‘MRI reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme’, Radiography. Elsevier Ltd, 16(2), pp. 136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2009.10.017.

9. Brealey, S., Piper. K., King. D., Bland. M., Caddick. J., Campbell. P., Gibbon. A., Highland. A., Jenkins. N., Petty. D. and Warren. D. (2013) ‘Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations: Selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist’, European Journal of Radiology, 82(10). doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.024.

10. Piper, K., Pittock, L. and Woznitza, N. (2018) ‘Radiographer reporting of neurological magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the head and cervical spine: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme’, Radiography, 24(4), pp. 366–369. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.05.006.

11. Piper, K., Mitchell. M., Griffin. K., Morgan. T., Roy. A., Thomas. A., Pittock. L., Woznitza. N., Faruqui. R. and Sakel. M. (2020) ‘Concordance between a neuroradiologist, a consultant radiologist and trained reporting radiographers interpreting MRI head examinations: An empirical study’, Radiography. W.B. Saunders. doi: 10.1016/J.RADI.2020.10.016.

12. Estall, H. and Mitchell, M. (2020) ‘MRI reporting radiographers - A survey assessment of number and areas of practice within the United Kingdom’, Radiography. Elsevier Ltd, 27(2), pp. 568–173. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.017.

13. Heales, C. J. J., Mills, K. and Ladd, E. (2021) ‘Radiographer advanced and consultant practice and community diagnostic hubs – a vision for the future’, Radiography. Elsevier Ltd, 27(xxxx), pp. S28–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.05.004.

14. Lockwood, P. (2020) ‘An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers’ scope of practice within the United Kingdom’, Radiography. W.B. Saunders Ltd, 26(2), pp. 102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.001.

15. Piper, K. J. and Buscall, K. L. (2008) ‘MRI reporting by radiographers: The construction of an objective structured examination’, Radiography, 14(2), pp. 78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2007.02.003.

16. Donovan, T. and Manning, D. J. (2006) ‘Successful reporting by non-medical practitioners such as radiographers, will always be task-specific and limited in scope’, Radiography, 12(1), pp. 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2005.01.004.

17. The Royal College of Radiologists (2018) Standards for interpretation and reporting of imaging investigations Second edition, Clinical Radiology. Available at: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/standards-interpretation-and-repor... (Accessed: 28/12/2022).

18. Bowers, D. (2020) Medical statistics from scratch: An introduction for health professionals. Proquest Ebook Central [Online]. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/canterburychristchurch/reader.... (Accessed: 28/12/2022)

19. Herzog, M.H., Francis, G and Clarke, A. (2019) Understanding statistics and experimental design: how not to lie with statistics. Library.open.org. Available at : https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/23029/100713... (Accessed: 06/08/2022). (Accessed: 28/12/2022)

20. Health Education England (2017) Multi-professional framework for advanced clinical practice in England, Health Education England. Available at: https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/multi-professio... (Accessed: 28/12/2020).

21. Harris, R. (2013) Code of professional conduct, Society of Radiographers. doi: 10.1177/030802269005300406.

22. The Health and Care Professions Council (2016) ‘Standards of conduct , and ethics’, Hcpc, pp. 1–17. Available at: https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-proficiency/ (Accessed 28/12/2022)

23. Murray, C. J. et al. (2012) ‘Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010’, Lancet, 380, pp. 2197–223.

24. Babatunde, O. O., Bishop. A., Cottrell. E., Jordan. J., Corp. N., Humphries. K., Hadley-Barrrows. T., Huntley. A and Van der Windt. D. (2020) ‘A systematic review and evidence synthesis of non-medical triage, self-referral and direct access services for patients with musculoskeletal pain’, PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science, 15(7 July). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235364

25. Richards, M. (2020) Diagnostics: Recovery and Renewal. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BM2025Pu-item-... (Accessed 28/12/2022)

26. Society of Radiographers (2013) Preliminary Clinical Evaluation and Clinical Reporting by Radiographers: Policy and Practice Guidance, Society of Radiographers. Available at: https://www.sor.org/learning/document-library/preliminary-clinical-e... (Accessed 28/12/2022)

27. Wu, M., Zhao, K. and Fils-Aime, F. (2022) ‘Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis’, Computers in Human Behavior Reports. Elsevier Ltd, 7(May), p. 100206. doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206.

Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/94096/an-investigation-into-the-clinical-scope-of-practice-of-mri-reporting-radiographers-within-the-united-kingdom

Download files


Publisher's version
1-s2.0-S1078817423000500-main.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 47
    total views
  • 18
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England
Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Shaw, T. and Woznitza, N. 2024. A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England. Radiography Open. 10 (1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5635
Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality
Lockwood, P. and Wenman, A. 2024. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality. Radiography. 30 (2), pp. 574-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.013
Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence
Tamburrini, N. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.11.006
Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature
Hammond, C and Lockwood, P. 2023. Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.020
Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review
Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Woznitza, N. and Shaw, T. 2023. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research. 23 (1270), pp. 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10161-y
Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey
Gibson, C. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey . Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.005
Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination
Langfield, H and Lockwood, P. 2023. Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination. Radiography Open. 9 (1), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5354
Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications
Lockwood, P. 2023. Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications. Insights into Imaging. Spring (7), pp. 39-45.
Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review
Lockwood, P. 2022. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review. York University.
Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination
Welborn, D. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination. Radiography. 28 (2), pp. 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.013
An assessment of the dose and image quality difference between AP and PA positioned adult radiographic knee examinations
Lockwood, P. and Mitchell, M. 2022. An assessment of the dose and image quality difference between AP and PA positioned adult radiographic knee examinations. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.12.004
Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction
Faulkner, R. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction . Radiography Open. 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5004
Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired.
Nolan-Bryant, A. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.008
A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England
Hinds, Z. and Lockwood, P. 2022. A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.006
Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays
Lockwood, P. and Khan, A. 2021. Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays. Radiography Open. 7 (1), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4529
Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers
Lockwood, P. 2021. Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers. PhD Thesis Canterbury Christ Church University School of Allied and Public Health Professions
COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students
Astirbadi, D. and Lockwood, P. 2021. COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.009
MRI reporting radiographers - A survey assessment of number and areas of practice within the United Kingdom
Estall, H. and Mitchell, M. 2020. MRI reporting radiographers - A survey assessment of number and areas of practice within the United Kingdom. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.017
Concordance between a neuroradiologist, a consultant radiologist and trained reporting radiographers interpreting MRI head examinations: An empirical study
Piper, K., Mitchell, M., Griffin, K., Morgan,T., Roy, A., Thomas, A., Pittock, L., Woznitza, N., Faruqui, R. and Sakel, M. 2020. Concordance between a neuroradiologist, a consultant radiologist and trained reporting radiographers interpreting MRI head examinations: An empirical study. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.10.016
Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs
Lockwood, P. and Pittock, L. 2019. Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.04.013
Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy
Lockwood, P., Elliott, J., Nelson, A. and Harris, S. 2019. Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy . BJR Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20190076
Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students
Lockwood, P. and Blackman, A. 2019. Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.012
An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom
Lockwood, P. 2019. An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 26 (2), pp. 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.001
Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module
Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.05.009
Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients
Hopkinson, G., Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.01.001
Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module
Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.11.007
CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme
Lockwood, P. 2017. CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 46 (4). https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160440
Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers
Lockwood, P. 2017. Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers. Journal of Social Science & Allied Health Professions. 1 (1), pp. 20-27.
Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting
Lockwood, P. 2017. Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 48 (1), pp. 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.001
Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective
Lockwood, P. 2016. Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 47 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.12.083
An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice.
Lockwood, P. 2016. An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.09.004
Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study
Lockwood, P., Pittock, L., Lockwood, C., Jeffery, C. and Piper, K. 2015. Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study. Radiography. 2015, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.06.005
Out of the comfort zone (Part 2)
Lockwood, P. 2013. Out of the comfort zone (Part 2).
AFROC analysis of reporting radiographer’s performance in CT head interpretation
Lockwood, P. and Piper, K. 2015. AFROC analysis of reporting radiographer’s performance in CT head interpretation. Radiography. 21 (3), pp. e90-e95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.04.001
Out of the comfort zone (Part 1)
Lockwood, P. 2013. Out of the comfort zone (Part 1).
Origins of the Reporting Radiographer
Lockwood, P. 2013. Origins of the Reporting Radiographer.
Patient safety and quality improvement: Iatrogenic venous air embolism in diagnostic imaging
Lockwood, P. and Breen, W. 2013. Patient safety and quality improvement: Iatrogenic venous air embolism in diagnostic imaging.
CT head reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme
Lockwood, P. and Piper, K. 2013. CT head reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme.
CT skull base & calvarium normal variant pitfalls
Lockwood, P. 2013. CT skull base & calvarium normal variant pitfalls.
CT head reporting by radiographers: results of an accredited postgraduate programme
Lockwood, P., Piper, K. and Pittock, L. 2015. CT head reporting by radiographers: results of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography. 21 (3), pp. e85-e89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.12.001