Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications

Journal article

Lockwood, P. 2023. Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications. Insights into Imaging. Spring (7), pp. 39-45.

Publication dates
Authors	Lockwood, P.
Keywords	Research ethics; Radiography; Radiographers
Year	2023
Journal	Insights into Imaging
Journal citation	Spring (7), pp. 39-45
Publisher	Haymarket
ISSN	2752-9762
Related URL	https://www.sor.org/getmedia/64957c13-e66a-4890-b94f-9b13f22e0fe0/Insight-spring-2023-book-for-WEB
Funder	none
Print	04 Mar 2023
Publication process dates
Accepted	16 Feb 2023
Deposited	30 Mar 2023
Supplemental file	File Access Level Open
Output status	Published
References	1. Society of Radiographers. Code of Professional Conduct, London; 2013. 2. College of Radiographers. Research Strategy 2021-2026, London; 2021. 3. College of Radiographers. Guidance on Approval and Accreditation of Practice Placements at all Levels of Pre-Registration Education, London; 2005. 4. European Federation of Radiographer Societies. EFRS White Paper on the Future of the Profession Radiographer Education, Research, and Practice (RERP): 2021-2031, Utrecht; 2022. 5. European Federation of Radiographer Societies. EFRS Statement on Radiography Education, Utrecht; 2019. 6. European Federation of Radiographer Societies. EFRS Statement on Radiography Research in Europe, Utrecht; 2016. 7. Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of Proficiency - Radiographers, London; 2013. 8. Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of conduct, performance and ethics, London; 2016. 9. Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of education and training guidance, London; 2017. 10. Friedrich-Nel H., Ramlaul A. 1.6 Ethical Considerations. In: Ramlaul A, editor. Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research: Skills and Strategies. 2nd ed., Springer; 2020. 11. Page SA., Nyeboer J. Improving the process of research ethics review. Res Integr Peer Rev 2017;2(1):14. Doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0038-7. 12. Guillemin M., Gillam L., Rosenthal D., Bolitho A. Human Research Ethics Committees: Examining Their Roles and Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2012;7(3):38–49. Doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.38. 13. Alberti KGMM. Local research ethics committees. BMJ 1995;311(7006):639–40. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639. 14. NHS Health Research Authority England H and CRWNSH and SCNI. Governance arrangements for research ethics committees: 20 20 1 edition FINAL 20 .07.2021 V2., London; 2021. 15. Jonker L., Cox D., Marshall G. Considerations, clues and challenges: Gaining Ethical and Trust research approval when using the NHS as a research setting. Radiography 2011;17(3):260–4. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2010.12.004. 16. Angell EL., Bryman A., Ashcroft RE., Dixon-Woods M. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17(2):131–6. Doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022756. 17. Wendler D., Miller FG. Risk-Benefit Analysis and the Net Risks Test. In: Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, Lie RK, Miller FG, and Wendler D, editors. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics , Oxford University Press; 2011, p. 503–12. 18. Jamrozik K. Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost? BMJ 2004;329(7460):286–7. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.286. 19. Beauchamp TL., Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. 20. Howard NR. Consequentialism and the Agent’s Point of View. Ethics 2022;132(4):787–816. Doi: 10.1086/719517. 21. Angell E., Dixon-Woods M. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? J Med Ethics 2009;35(2):130–2. Doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025940. 22. Fitzgerald MH., Phillips PA., Yule E. The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives. Ethics Behav 2006;16(4):377–95. Doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1604_7. 23. Vadeboncoeur C., Townsend N., Foster C., Sheehan M. Variation in university research ethics review: Reflections following an inter-university study in England. Res Ethics 2016;12(4):217–33. Doi: 10.1177/1747016116652650. 24. Bockhold S., McNulty J., Abdurakman E., Bezzina P., Drey N., England A., et al. Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE). Radiography 2022;28(4):1032–41. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.002. 25. Bockhold S., McNulty J., Abdurakman E., Bezzina P., Drey N., England A., et al. Research ethics training, challenges, and suggested improvements across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE). Radiography 2022;28(4):1016–24. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.004. 26. Health Research Authority. Integrated Research Application Service 6.3.2. Integrated Research Application Service. Available from: https://www.myresearchproject.org.uk/ [accessed October 17, 2022]. 27. Health Research Authority., Medical Research Council. HRA Defining Research Table. HRA Defining Research Table. Available from: http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/docs/DefiningResearchTa... [accessed October 14, 2022]. 28. Hayre CM., Strudwick RM. Ethnography for Radiographers: A Methodological Insight for Prospective Researchers. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2019;50(3):352–8. Doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.06.049. 29. Toomey RJ., McEntee MF., Rainford LA. The pop-up research centre – Challenges and opportunities. Radiography 2019;25:S19–24. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.05.009. 30. Gordon L., Dickinson A., Offredy M., Smiddy J. A research note on the benefit of patient and public involvement in research: The experience of prostate cancer patients regarding information in radiotherapy. Radiography 2017;23(2):167–70. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.02.004. 31. UK Government. The Data Protection Act 2018: Chapter 2 The GDPR. , England: UK Government; 2018. 32. TriNetX. Real World Data. Real World Data. Available from: https://trinetx.com/real-world-data/ [accessed October 12, 2022]. 33. National Institute for Health and Care Research. NIHR Open Data. NIHR Open Data. Available from: https://nihr.opendatasoft.com/explore/ [accessed October 12, 2022]. 34. National Institute for Health and Care Research. 1.2 NIHR Open Research Data Policy. 1.2 NIHR Open Research Data Policy. Available from: https://openresearch.nihr.ac.uk/for-authors/data-guidelines [accessed October 12, 2022]. 35. Health Research Authority., Medical Research Council. HRA Decision Tool. HRA Decision Tool. Available from: http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/ [accessed October 14, 2022]. 36. Information Commissioner’s Office. Data Sharing Code of Practice, Cheshire; 2011. 37. Information Commissioners Office. ICO GDPR Guidance: Contracts and liabilities between controllers and processors, 2017. 38. Information Commissioner’s Office. Lawful basis for processing. Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Available from: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-... [accessed October 17, 2022]. 39. Information Commissioner’s Office. What is personal data? . Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Available from: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-... [accessed October 17, 2022]. 40. Information Commissioner’s Office. Special category data . Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Available from: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-... [accessed October 17, 2022]. 41. Scally A. Ethical issues in research involving children and young people. Radiography 2014;20(3):202–5. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2014.01.006. 42. Grubb A., Scott R., Lewis P., Bates P. The law relating to consent. In: Eckstein S, editor. Manual for Research Ethics Committees. 6th ed., Cambridge University Press; 2003. 43. Angell E., Biggs H., Gahleitner F., Dixon-Woods M. What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children? Arch Dis Child 2010;95(11):915–7. Doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.172395. 44. UK Government. Mental Capacity Act 2005, London: UK Government; 2005. 45. Information Commissioner’s Office. UK GDPR data breach reporting (DPA 2018). Personal Data Breach. Available from: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/report-a-breach/personal-data-b... [accessed October 17, 2022]. 46. UK Government. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, London: UK Government; 1999. 47. Health and Safety Executive. Control of substances hazardous to health, Norwich: Health and Safety Executive; 2013. 48. Health and Safety Executive. EH40/2005 Workplace exposure limits, Norwich: Health and Safety Executive; 2020. 49. UK Government. The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 , London: UK Government; 2017. 50. UK Government. Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (IR(ME)R) 2017 (SI 2017/1322), London: HMSO; 2017. 51. Health Protection Agency. Risks from Ionising Radiation. (HPA-RPD-066), Chilton; 2010. 52. Health and Safety Executive. Electromagnetic fields at work, Health and Safety Executive; 2016. 53. Health and Safety Executive. The Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations, Norwich: Health and Safety Executive; 2002. 54. Research Excellence Framework. REF2021 Main Panel A overview report, 2022. 55. Price R. Ethical issues in publishing. Radiography 2009;15(2):95–6. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2009.03.001.

Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/94403/research-ethics-applications-back-to-basics-what-you-ought-to-know-about-research-ethics-applications

114
total views
0
total downloads
7
views this month
0
downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England

Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Shaw, T. and Woznitza, N. 2024. A survey of the NHS reporting radiographer workforce in England. Radiography Open. 10 (1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5635

Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality

Lockwood, P. and Wenman, A. 2024. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality. Radiography. 30 (2), pp. 574-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.013

Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence

Tamburrini, N. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Obesity bias in diagnostic radiography students: A survey of attitudes, perceptions and technical confidence. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.11.006

Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature

Hammond, C and Lockwood, P. 2023. Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature. Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.020

Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review

Lockwood, P., Burton, C., Woznitza, N. and Shaw, T. 2023. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X‑ray reporting service within the NHS in England: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research. 23 (1270), pp. 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10161-y

Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey

Gibson, C. and Lockwood, P. 2023. Impostor phenomenon traits in radiography students: findings from a UK pilot survey . Radiography. 30 (1), pp. 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.005

Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination

Langfield, H and Lockwood, P. 2023. Investigating the adjacent patient radiation dose received during a simulated ward chest X-ray examination. Radiography Open. 9 (1), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5354

An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom

Mitchell, M. and Lockwood, P. 2023. An investigation into the clinical scope of practice of MRI reporting radiographers within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 29 (3), pp. 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.02.015

Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review

Lockwood, P. 2022. Assessing the barriers and enablers to the diagnostic radiographer X-ray reporting service within the NHS in England: A systematic literature review. York University.

Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination

Welborn, D. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination. Radiography. 28 (2), pp. 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.013

Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction

Faulkner, R. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Could posterior-anterior projection cervical spine radiographs improve image quality and dose reduction . Radiography Open. 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5004

Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired.

Nolan-Bryant, A. and Lockwood, P. 2022. Diagnostic radiography students' perceptions towards communication with service users who are deaf or hearing impaired. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.008

A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England

Hinds, Z. and Lockwood, P. 2022. A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England. Radiography. 29 (1), pp. 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.006

Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays

Lockwood, P. and Khan, A. 2021. Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays. Radiography Open. 7 (1), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4529

Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers

Lockwood, P. 2021. Efficacy, utility, and validity in Computed Tomography head reporting by radiographers. PhD Thesis Canterbury Christ Church University School of Allied and Public Health Professions

COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students

Astirbadi, D. and Lockwood, P. 2021. COVID-19: A literature review of the impact on diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.009

Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs

Lockwood, P. and Pittock, L. 2019. Multi-professional image interpretation: performance in preliminary clinical evaluation of appendicular radiographs. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.04.013

Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy

Lockwood, P., Elliott, J., Nelson, A. and Harris, S. 2019. Computed tomography head and facial bones review of a 2,700 year old Egyptian mummy . BJR Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20190076

Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students

Lockwood, P. and Blackman, A. 2019. Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.012

An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom

Lockwood, P. 2019. An evaluation of CT head reporting radiographers' scope of practice within the United Kingdom. Radiography. 26 (2), pp. 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.001

Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module

Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Image Interpretation by radiographers in brain, spine and knee MRI examinations: Findings from an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.05.009

Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients

Hopkinson, G., Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Evaluation of an equilibrium phase free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prototype sequence compared to traditional breath-held MRI acquisition in liver oncology patients. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.01.001

Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module

Lockwood, P. and Dolbear, G. 2018. Nuclear medicine image interpretation by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate module. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.11.007

CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme

Lockwood, P. 2017. CT Sinus and facial bones reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 46 (4). https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160440

Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers

Lockwood, P. 2017. Exploring variation and trends in adherence to national occupational standards for reporting radiographers. Journal of Social Science & Allied Health Professions. 1 (1), pp. 20-27.

Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting

Lockwood, P. 2017. Observer performance in Computed Tomography head reporting. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 48 (1), pp. 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.001

Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective

Lockwood, P. 2016. Exploring the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging reporting by radiographers: A UK perspective. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 47 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.12.083

An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice.

Lockwood, P. 2016. An economic evaluation of introducing a skills mix approach to CT head reporting in clinical practice. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.09.004

Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study

Lockwood, P., Pittock, L., Lockwood, C., Jeffery, C. and Piper, K. 2015. Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study. Radiography. 2015, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.06.005

Research ethics applications: Back to basics: What you ought to know about research ethics applications

114

0

7

0

Export as

Related outputs