How choice of presentation of digital feedback may influence learners’ engagement with it for academic development

Speech


Starr, S. 2017. How choice of presentation of digital feedback may influence learners’ engagement with it for academic development.
AuthorsStarr, S.
TypeSpeech
Description

The aim of this session is to share and discuss findings from research at Canterbury Christ Church University investigating how the presentation of digital feedback on written coursework may influence engagement with feedback. It was found that choice of presentation influenced both learners’ motivation and ability to engage with their feedback for their academic development (see Starr, 2016 for full report). The session will comprise a presentation on the research, with an emphasis on the findings, followed by questions and discussion around implications for practice. Where analysis indicates influences on engagement are largely pedagogic, not specific to the technology in question, the findings may help to guide action research into markers’ own practice across a range of digital feedback tools.

REFERENCES:
Starr, S. (2016) An exploratory investigation into influences of form of digital feedback on learners’ engagement with their feedback. M.Sc. thesis, University of Edinburgh. http://create.canterbury.ac.uk/15171/. Accessed: 13 Mar 2017

Year2017
ConferenceThe 13th Learning and Teaching Conference
Related URLhttp://create.canterbury.ac.uk/15171/
References

Starr, S. (2016) An exploratory investigation into influences of form of digital feedback on learners’ engagement with their feedback. M.Sc. thesis, University of Edinburgh. http://create.canterbury.ac.uk/15171/. Accessed: 13 Mar 2017

Publication process dates
Deposited14 Jun 2017
Completed08 Jun 2017
Accepted author manuscript
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/88327/how-choice-of-presentation-of-digital-feedback-may-influence-learners-engagement-with-it-for-academic-development

  • 43
    total views
  • 10
    total downloads
  • 3
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

An exploratory investigation into influences of form of digital feedback on learners’ engagement with their feedback
Starr, S. 2016. An exploratory investigation into influences of form of digital feedback on learners’ engagement with their feedback. Masters Thesis University of Edinburgh Moray House School of Education
Technologies for transformative learning
Starr, S. and Donovan, G. 2015. Technologies for transformative learning.
The chamber of fear: a role playing approach to the recruitment and selection of learning technologists
Barry, W. and Starr, S. 2015. The chamber of fear: a role playing approach to the recruitment and selection of learning technologists.
Can use of reusable comments in electronic feedback promote sustainable feedback?
Starr, S. 2013. Can use of reusable comments in electronic feedback promote sustainable feedback?
Policies, mechanisms and systems
Starr, S. and Westerman, S. 2013. Policies, mechanisms and systems.
Efficacy of Turnitin in support of an institutional plagiarism policy
Starr, S. and Graham-Matheson, L. 2012. Efficacy of Turnitin in support of an institutional plagiarism policy.
Is it cheating or learning the craft of writing? Using Turnitin to help students avoid plagiarism
Graham-Matheson, L. and Starr, S. 2013. Is it cheating or learning the craft of writing? Using Turnitin to help students avoid plagiarism. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology. 21 (17218). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17218
Blended learning in Higher Education (HE): conceptualising key strategic issues within a Business School
Fearon, C., Starr, S. and McLaughlin, H. 2012. Blended learning in Higher Education (HE): conceptualising key strategic issues within a Business School. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal. 26 (2), pp. 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777281211201196
Value of blended learning in university and the workplace: some experiences of university students
Fearon, C., Starr, S. and McLaughlin, H. 2011. Value of blended learning in university and the workplace: some experiences of university students. Industrial and Commercial Training. 43 (7), pp. 446-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197851111171872
Efficacy of Turnitin in support of an institutional plagiarism policy
Starr, S. 2011. Efficacy of Turnitin in support of an institutional plagiarism policy.
An investigation into the potential for blended learning approaches in enhancing students’ assessment experience on an Introduction to Economics and Statistics Module
Minhas, S. and Starr, S. 2011. An investigation into the potential for blended learning approaches in enhancing students’ assessment experience on an Introduction to Economics and Statistics Module. Higher Education Academy Economics Network.
Institutional plagiarism policy and Turnitin: perceptions and experiences of staff and students
Starr, S. 2011. Institutional plagiarism policy and Turnitin: perceptions and experiences of staff and students.
Efficacy of Turnitin in support of an institutional plagiarism policy
Starr, S. and Graham-Matheson, L. 2011. Efficacy of Turnitin in support of an institutional plagiarism policy. plagiarismadvice.org.
Cloudbusting: learning technologists and institutional culture change
Kipar, N., Westerman, S., Lambert, G. and Starr, S. 2004. Cloudbusting: learning technologists and institutional culture change.
Gauging learner voice - e-feedback experience at Canterbury Christ Church University
Starr, S. 2011. Gauging learner voice - e-feedback experience at Canterbury Christ Church University.
e-feedback: who's using it and why?
Starr, S. 2010. e-feedback: who's using it and why?
The student voice - students’ experience of Blackboard
Starr, S., Ritchie, C. and Gracey, J. 2009. The student voice - students’ experience of Blackboard. in: Walker, S., Ryan, M. and Teed, R. (ed.) Learning from the Learners' Experience: e-learning@greenwich/conference Post-Conference Reflections Greenwich University of Greenwich. pp. 78-80