Parents who wait: acknowledging the support needs and vulnerabilities of approved adopters during their wait to become adoptive parents
Rogers, R. 2017. Parents who wait: acknowledging the support needs and vulnerabilities of approved adopters during their wait to become adoptive parents. Child & Family Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12417
There is a significant amount of existing research exploring adoption policies, processes, and the experiences and safeguarding of children. However, although much research has children at the focus, little research has been conducted into the experiences of approved and waiting adopters. Where research has included adopters, focus tends to be on how adopters can aid an adoptive placement and what support they can provide to an adoptive child. In this article, the experiences of approved and waiting adopters are at the centre.
This article reports on a digital ethnographic research project, which used unobtrusive methods to conduct a thematic analysis of over 600 posts made by waiting adopters on publically available UK online adoption forums in 2015. Online posts discussed the perceived over‐recruitment of adopters; the decision‐making behind adopters' initial preferences; and the negative emotional effects of the waiting period following approval. This article argues that more consideration needs to be given to the needs of and support for approved adopters whilst they wait for an adoptive child.
|Journal||Child & Family Social Work|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12417|
|Online||21 Nov 2017|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||23 Nov 2017|
|Accepted||13 Nov 2017|
|Accepted author manuscript|
Anthony, R., Meakings, S., Doughty, J., Ottaway, H., Holland, S., & Shelton, K. (2016). Factors affecting adoption in Wales: Predictors of variation in time between entry to care and adoptive placement. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 184–190.
Barth, R. P., & Berry, M. (1988). Adoption and disruption: Rates, risks, and responses. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
BBC (2011a) ‘A home for Maisie’, 10 May 2011, www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b010fq2d
BBC (2011b) ‘Panorama: The truth about adoption’, 14 December 2011, www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b019307z
BBC (2012) ‘Protecting our children’, February 2012, www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01bskrq/episodes/guide
Beaulieu, A., & Estalella, A. (2012). Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Information, Communication and Society, 15, 23–42.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., & Hurtig-Gane, M. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage Publications.
Burge, P., Burke, N., Meiklejohn, E., & Groll, D. (2015). Making choices: Adoption seekers' preferences and available children with special needs. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1–22.
Channel 4 (2014a) ‘15,000 kids and counting’, www.channel4.com/programmes/15000-kids-and-counting
Channel 4 (2014b) Finding Mum and Dad, www.channel4.com/programmes/finding-mum-and-dad
Cousins, M., & Hussain, A. (1984). Michele Foucault: Theoretical traditions in the social sciences. London: MacMillan.
Daily Mail (2011) ‘Orphans aged over five left to languish in care because they're 'too old' for adoption’ 18 April 2011, www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1377982/Orphans-aged-left-languish-care-theyre-old-adoption.html
Dance, C. (2010) Linking and Matching: A survey of adoption agency practice in England and Wales. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32754/
Dance, C. (2015) ‘Adoption Link: Finding the right match: A survey of approved adopters’ experiences of agency support in the linking and matching process'. www.adoptionlink.co.uk/doc/finding_the_right_match.pdf
Dance, C., & Farmer, E. (2014). Changing lives and changing minds: The experiences of adoptive parents from application to approval. Adoption and Fostering, 38(2), 101–114.
Dance, C., Neil, E., & Rogers, R. (2017). Inter-agency adoption: subsidy of the inter-agency fee. London: Department for Education, DFE-RR685.
Department for Education (2014) Adoption agencies data in England: 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014, www.gov.uk/government/statistics/adoption-agencies-data-in-england-1-april-2013-to-31-march-2014
Department for Education (2015a) Adoption Leadership Board headline measures and business intelligence Quarter 4 2014 to 2015, August 2015, www.gov.uk/government/publications/adoption-leadership-board-quarterly-data-reports
Department for Education (2015b) ‘Regionalising adoption’, www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/437128/Regionalising_adoption.pdf
Department for Education (2015c) ‘Children looked after in England including adoption: 2014 to 2015’, DfE SFR34, www.gov.uk/government/statistics/children-looked-after-in-england-including-adoption-2014-to-2015
Department for Education (2016) ‘Children looked after placements as at 31 March 2015’, www.gov.uk/government/statistics/children-looked-after-placements-as-at-31-march-2015
Donovan, S. (2015) The great adoption mismatch, October 19, 2015. In Community Care, www.communitycare.co.uk/2015/10/19/great-adoption-mismatch/
Duxbury, S. W. (2015). Information creation on online drug forums: How drug use becomes moral on the margins of science. Current Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115596055
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Farmer, E., & Dance, C. (2016). Family finding and matching in adoption: What helps to make a good match? British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 974–992.
Hewitt-Taylor, J., & Bond, C. S. (2012). What e-patients want from the doctor-patient relationship: Content analysis of posts on discussion boards. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 146, e155.
House of Commons (2015) Children in care in England: Statistics, House of Commons Briefing Paper, Number 04470, October 2015, http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04470/SN044...
Jennings, S., Mellish, L., Tasker, F., Lamb, M., & Golombok, S. (2014). Why adoption? Gay, lesbian and heterosexual adoptive parents' reproductive experiences and reasons for adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 17(3), 205–216.
Jowett, A. (2015). A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 287–297.
Linkmaker (2015), Data Page, www.linkmaker.co.uk/data
Magnet, S. (2007). Feminist sexualities, race and the internet: An investigation of suicidegirls.com.In. New Media & Society, 9(4), 577–602.
Malik, S. H., & Coulson, N. S. (2013). Coming to terms with permanent involuntary childlessness: A phenomenological analysis of bulletin board postings. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 9(1).
Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855.
Ofsted (2013) Adoption quality assurance and data forms 2012–13 first statistical release, www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/adoption-quality-assurance-and-data-forms-2012-13-first-statistical-release
Ofsted (2015) Adoption agencies data in England: 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014, www.gov.uk/government/statistics/adoption-agencies-data-in-england-1-april-2013-to-31-march-2014
Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
Potter, J., & Wetherall, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
Rife, S., Cate, K. L., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2016). Participant recruitment and data collection through Facebook: The role of personality factors. International Journal of Social, 19(1), 69–83.
Roberts, L. D. (2015). Ethical issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 314–325. pp.
Scoats, R. (2017). Inclusive masculinity and Facebook photographs among early emerging adults at a British university. Journal of Adolescent Research, 32(3), 323–345.
Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A. (2010). Interviews and internet forums: A comparison of two sources of qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 20(5), 595–606.
Selwyn, J., Meakings, S., & Wijedasa, D. (2015). Beyond the adoption order: Challenges, interventions and adoption disruption. London: BAAF.
Slater, D. (1999). Trading sexpics on IRC: Embodiment and authenticity on the internet. Body and Society, 4(4), 91–117.
Stevenson, L. (2016) What could this latest adoption judgment mean for social workers? Will Re W change practice the way Re B and Re B-S did? Or will the adoption landscape stay the same? In Community Care, www.communitycare.co.uk/2016/08/18/latest-adoption-judgment-mean-social-workers/
Telegraph (2012) Rage at the adoption red tape that denies a child a home: Why is so little being done for the 65,000 children languishing in the care system? 24 November 2012 www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/children/9698982/Rage-at-the-adoption-red-tape-that-denies-a-child-a-home.html
Telegraph (2015a) Wanted: A new home for little Grace before Christmas, 23 October 2015 www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11949846/Wanted-A-new-home-for-little-Grace-before-Christmas.html
Telegraph (2015b) Getting adopted is straightforward—As long as you're a healthy white baby 9 July 2015, www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/fatherhood/11729260/Getting-adopted-is-straightforward-as-long-as-youre-a-healthy-white-baby.html
Valdez, G. M., & McNamara, J. R. (1994). Matching to prevent adoption disruption. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 11, 391–403.
Walther, J. B. (2002). Research ethics in internet-enabled research: Human subject issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 205–216.
Ward, J., & Smeeton, J. (2015). “It's a big deal, being given a person”—A study of the links between infertility and adoption. Nottingham: Commissioned by Family Care. available at http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27084/1/4458_Ward.pdf
0views this month
2downloads this month