Citizenship teachers: different types, different needs

Conference paper


Leighton, R. 2012. Citizenship teachers: different types, different needs.
AuthorsLeighton, R.
TypeConference paper
Description

This paper outlines the diverse nature of citizenship education provision in England and raises some of the problems this creates in relation to the initial and continued professional development of pre-service and in-service teachers, a situation exacerbated by the reduction in state authorised citizenship teacher education programmes. It goes on to identify some of the variety of citizenship teacher academic backgrounds and some of the challenges which arise for both specialist and non-specialist citizenship teachers in addressing divergent, complex – and sometimes invisible – modes of subject provision.

It is argued that differences in school provision, teacher background and attitude(s) to the subject require sensitivity in the construction and delivery of programmes intended to enhance teacher confidence and competence in citizenship education.

A typology of the ‘8 Cs’ of citizenship teachers is identified – Co-existence Colonisation Commitment Compliance Conflict Convenience Conversion Cynicism – and discussed, outlining the range of needs and attitudes among specialist and non-specialist teachers of citizenship education, and some recommendations are offered regarding how these can be approached.

Keywordsdifferent needs; non/specialists; professional development; teacher typology
Year2012
ConferenceCitizED Conference
File
Publication process dates
Deposited12 Jun 2012
Output statusUnpublished
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/86968/citizenship-teachers-different-types-different-needs

  • 5
    total views
  • 2
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Theorizing young people's perceptions of their citizenship identity
Leighton, R. and Nielsen, L. 2018. Theorizing young people's perceptions of their citizenship identity. in: Pineda-Alfonso, J. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Education for Participation Citizenship and Global Prosperity Pennsylvania, USA IGI Global.
Formally equal, but not really: the second stage of an ongoing study into English school students’ perceptions of ‘the citizen’
Leighton, R. 2018. Formally equal, but not really: the second stage of an ongoing study into English school students’ perceptions of ‘the citizen’. Citizenship Teaching and Learning. 13 (1), pp. 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl.13.1.31_1
Ethnicity, gender, social class and citizenship: comparative views from England and Sweden
Leighton, R. and Nielsen, L. 2017. Ethnicity, gender, social class and citizenship: comparative views from England and Sweden. Teaching Citizenship. 45, pp. 42-43.
What are the gender, class and ethnicity of citizenship? A study of upper secondary school students’ views on citizenship education in England and Sweden
Nielsen, L. and Leighton, R. 2017. What are the gender, class and ethnicity of citizenship? A study of upper secondary school students’ views on citizenship education in England and Sweden. Confero. https://doi.org/10.3384/confer.2001-4562.170530
England's self-image as portrayed in public examination Citizenship Education textbooks
Leighton, R. 2014. England's self-image as portrayed in public examination Citizenship Education textbooks. in: Cunningham, P. and Fretwell, N. (ed.) Innovative Practice and Research Trends in Identity, Citizenship and Education London CiCe. pp. 140-155
Testament video interview with Ralph Leighton
Blamires, M. and Leighton, R. 2013. Testament video interview with Ralph Leighton.
Citizenship education for children of the elite in England
Leighton, R. 2013. Citizenship education for children of the elite in England. in: Cunningham, P. (ed.) Identities and Citizenship Education: Controversy, Crisis and Challenges London CiCe. pp. 420-428
Overcoming the nocebo effect - a radical approach to citizenship education
Leighton, R. 2013. Overcoming the nocebo effect - a radical approach to citizenship education. International Journal of Education for Social Justice. 2 (1).
Introducing pre-service citizenship teachers to the design and implementation of focus days to enhance their professional learning
Leighton, R. 2011. Introducing pre-service citizenship teachers to the design and implementation of focus days to enhance their professional learning. Citizenship Teaching and Learning. 7 (1), pp. 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl.7.1.89_1
Education and schooling 11-16 years
Peterson, A. and Leighton, R. 2012. Education and schooling 11-16 years. in: Arthur, J. and Peterson, A. (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Education Abingdon Routledge. pp. 190-198
Sociology of education
Leighton, R. 2012. Sociology of education. in: Arthur, J. and Peterson, A. (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Education Abingdon Routledge. pp. 58-65
Post 14 Citizenship examinations
Leighton, R. 2006. Post 14 Citizenship examinations. http://citized.info.
Some insights into Citizenship teacher training in France
Leighton, R. and Pink, R. 2006. Some insights into Citizenship teacher training in France.
Teaching Citizenship is a subversive activity
Leighton, R. 2005. Teaching Citizenship is a subversive activity.
What you give is what you get
Leighton, R. 2004. What you give is what you get.
Who are you? An introductory examination of Citizenship education
Leighton, R. 2002. Who are you? An introductory examination of Citizenship education.
Can education be subversive? Postman And Weingartner and the case of citizenship in the National Curriculum for England
Leighton, R. 2006. Can education be subversive? Postman And Weingartner and the case of citizenship in the National Curriculum for England.
Trainees, mentors and citizenship: fair conflict resolution begins here
Leighton, R. 2004. Trainees, mentors and citizenship: fair conflict resolution begins here. Teaching Citizenship. 9, pp. 26-31.
The (f)utility of focus days in developing citizenship education
Leighton, R. 2010. The (f)utility of focus days in developing citizenship education.
Radical education: the past?
Leighton, R. 2009. Radical education: the past? in: Arthur, J. and Davies, I. (ed.) The Routledge Education Studies Textbook London, UK Routledge. pp. 207-215
Developing active participation in citizenship
Leighton, R. 2010. Developing active participation in citizenship. in: Gearon, L. (ed.) Learning to Teach Citizenship in the Secondary School London, UK Routledge. pp. 135-143
The nature of citizenship education provision: an initial study
Leighton, R. 2004. The nature of citizenship education provision: an initial study. Curriculum Journal. 15 (2), pp. 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517042000226829
Revisiting Postman and Weingartner’s ‘New education’ – is teaching citizenship a subversive activity?
Leighton, R. 2006. Revisiting Postman and Weingartner’s ‘New education’ – is teaching citizenship a subversive activity? International Journal of Citizenship Teaching and Learning. 2 (1), pp. 79-89.
Planning, evaluating and auditing the whole-school provision
Leighton, R. 2007. Planning, evaluating and auditing the whole-school provision. in: Gearon, L. (ed.) A Practical Guide to Teaching Citizenship in the Secondary School London Routledge. pp. 72-78
Teaching citizenship education: a radical approach
Leighton, R. 2011. Teaching citizenship education: a radical approach. London Continuum.