Cognition, relevance and ideology formation through travel documentaries: A longitudinal approach to audiences

The paper proposes a novel longitudinal approach to the study of the rhetorical effects of media by combining Audience Research (e.g. Schrøder et al., 2003), Social Semiotics (e.g. Kress and van Leeuwen, 1996, 2001; van Leeuwen, 1999; Machin and Mayr, 2012) and Relevance Theory (Sperber and Wilson, 1995). After introducing a more nuanced model of RT’s contextual effect, the paper reports an empirical case study to explicate the methodological approach. Evidence is provided that a specific text can have a long-lasting effect on an audience: a hierarchy of effects and the cognitive circumstances under which this may happen are discussed.

Angouri, J. and Wodak, R. (2014). ‘They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: the Greek success story and the rise of the far right. Discourse & Society, 25,
pp. 540–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536955
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.
Baudry, J.L. and Williams, A. (1974). Ideological effects of the basic cinematographic apparatus. Film Quarterly, 28, pp. 39–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/
1211632
Benwell, B. (2007). New sexism? Readers’ responses to the use of irony in men’s magazines. Journalism Studies, 8, pp. 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/
14616700701411797
Castaldi, J. (2021). A multimodal analysis of the representation of the Rohingya crisis in BBC’s Burma with Simon Reeve (2018): Integrating Audience Research
in Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies. Multimodal Communication, 10(1), pp. 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2020-0014
Castaldi, J. (2022).Cognition and ideological effects in the interaction between viewers and BBC travel documentaries: Combining multimodal critical discourse
analysis and audience research. Canterbury Christ Church University. Doctoral Dissertation.
Castaldi, J. (2024). Keeping the myth of the British Empire alive: Combining a multimodal analysis of two BBC travel documentaries with audience research.
In E. Zantides and S. Andreou (eds.), Semiotics and Visual Communication IV: Myths of Today (pp. 331–353). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Chouliaraki, L. (2000). National identities in late modernity. A case study of audience reception. In M. Reisigl and R. Wodak (eds.), The Semiotics of Racism.
Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 305–330). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Chouliaraki, L. (2003). Mediated experience and youth identities in a posttraditional order. In A. Georgakopoulou and J.K. Androutsopoulos (eds.). Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities (pp. 303–331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Condit, C. (1991). The rhetorical limits of polysemy. In R.K. Avery and D. Eason (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Media and Society (pp. 365–386). New York: The Guilford Press.
Curran, J. (2002). Media and Power. London: Routledge.
Demetriou, D. (2018). Discourse on immigration in the UK: representations and evaluations of Romanians and Bulgarians as ‘benefit tourists’. PhD Thesis,
Canterbury Christ Church University. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/5ebe4ee6a4955fd1c35264925cff3600/1...(Accessed 7 June 2024).
Edwards, E.B. (2016). “It’s irrelevant to me!” Young black women talk back to VH1’s Love and Hip Hop New York. Journal of Black Studies, 47, pp. 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934715627124
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
Forceville, C. (1999a). Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s reading images: The grammar of visual design (1996). Language and Literature, 8(2), pp. 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800204
Forceville, C. (1999b). Art or ad? The influence of genre-attribution on the interpretation of images. SPIEL, 18(2), pp. 279–300.
Forceville, C. (2020). Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gerbner, G. and Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), pp. 172–194.
Giles, D. (2003). Media Psychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hall, S. (1980/2005). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe and P. Willis (eds.), Culture, Media, Language: Working
Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79 (pp. 117–127). London: Routledge.
Hart, C. (2018). ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society, 29(3), pp. 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734663
He, J. (2019). Two-layer reading positions in comments on online news discourse about China. Discourse & Communication, 13, pp. 473–496. https://doi.org/
10.1177/1750481319856206
Ifantidou, E. and Tzanne, A. (2006). Multimodality and relevance in the Athens 2004. Olympic Games televised promotion. Revista Alicantina de Estudios
Ingleses, No. 19 (Nov. 2006); pp. 191–210. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/5176
Kosetzi, K. (2007). Representations of women in terms of gender roles and sexual practices in Σχεδόν Ποτέ (ΣΠ) ‘Almost Never’: the text and the audience. PhD Thesis, Lancashire, England, Lancaster University.
Montgomery, M. (2007). The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge.
Paterson, L.L., Coffey-Glover, L., and Peplow, D. (2016). Negotiating stance within discourses of class: reactions to benefits street. Discourse & Society, 27,
pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611558
Phelan, S. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and media studies. In J. Flowerdew and J.E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse
Studies (pp. 285–297). London: Routledge.
Phillips, L. (1999). Risk, reflexivity and democracy: mediating expert knowledge in the news. Nordicom Review, 21, pp. 115–35. 10.1515/nor-2017-0389
Richardson, K. (1994). Interpreting breadline Britain. In U.H. Meinhof and K. Richardson (eds.), Text, Discourse and Context: Representations of
Poverty in Britain (pp. 93–121). London: Longman.
Richardson, K. (2000). Intertextuality and the discursive construction of knowledge: the case of economic understanding. In U.H. Meinhof and J. Smith
(eds.). Intertextuality and the Media: From Genre to Everyday Life (pp. 76– 97). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Piazza, R. and Haarman, L. (2016). A pragmatic cognitive model for the interpretation of verbal-visual communication in television news programmes. Visual
Communication, 15(4), pp. 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215621688
Schrøder, K.C., Drotner, K., Kline, S. and Murray, C. (2003). Researching Audiences. London: Arnold.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sullivan, J.L. (2019). Media Audiences: Effects, Users, Institutions, and Power. Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical
Discourse Analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.
Walton, M.J. (2016). Buddhism, Politics and Political Thought in Myanmar. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yus, F. (1998). Relevance theory and media discourse: A verbal-visual model of communication. Poetics, 25(5), pp. 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-
422X(97)00020-X
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Yus, F., (2022) Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. London and New York: Routledge.