| Abstract | Chalk rivers and streams are of conservation importance due their ecological diversity, historical relevance and economic value. With more than 200 chalk watercourses, England is considered unusual in having the most chalk rivers in the world. However, due to increasing anthropogenic activities, many English chalk rivers and streams are becoming badly degraded. The non-biting midges or chironomids (Diptera, Chironomidae) are considered key-stone taxa in aquatic food webs, and have been used as ecological indicators of freshwater quality and environmental stress. Here we determined the generic richness, diversity, and community structure of Chironomidae across six sites in the mid-section of the Great Stour in Kent, a chalk river for which concern has been expressed regarding both water and habitat quality. Based on the morphological identification of 1336 insect larvae from the six sites (four in Westgate Parks, Canterbury, and two at nearby locations upstream and downstream from Canterbury City), a total of 20 genera of Chironomidae were identified, including some taxa indicative of freshwater habitats with low levels of organic pollution. There were different levels of generic richness and diversity among sites, and while there was little variation in the community composition among the sites within Westgate Parks, there were noticeable generic differences among Westgate Parks sites compared with those upstream and downstream, showing the highest complementarity and Beta diversity values. Overall, the results were comparable with other studies on chironomids in chalk rivers and other river systems. Although spatially limited to a small stretch of river, this represents the first study on chironomids in the Great Stour and provides baseline information on the diversity and structure of this important insect group with aquatic larvae, useful for the objective interpretation of any future biological assessments and monitoring programmes on the Kentish Stour, and also for comparisons with other chalk rivers. |
|---|
| References | Armitage PD, Cranston PS, Pinder LC. 1995. The Chironomidae: the biology and ecology of non-biting midges. London: Chapman & Hall.
Axford Y, Briner JP, Cooke CA, Francis DR, Michelutti N, Miller GH, Smol JP, Thomas EK, Wilson CR, Wolfe AP. 2009. Recent changes in a remote Arctic lake are unique within the past 200,000 years. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 106:18443–18446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907094106.
Berrie AD. 1992. The chalk-stream environment. Hydrobiologia. 248:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008881.
Biodiversity Action Reporting System. 2011. The National Archives. Available at https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110303145215/http://www.ukbap-reporting.org.uk/ [accessed 07/07/2020].
Brooks SJ. 2006. Fossil midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) as palaeoclimatic indicators for the Eurasian region. Quat Sci Rev. 25:1894–1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.03.021.
Brooks SJ, Langdon PG, Heiri O. 2007. The identification and use of Palaearctic Chironomidae larvae in palaeoecology. London: Quaternary Research Association Technical Guide No. 10.
Casas JJ, Langton PH. 2008. Chironomid species richness of a permanent and a temporary Mediterranean stream: a long-term comparative study. J North Am Benthol Soc. 27:746–759. https://doi.org/10.1899/07-115.1.
CCC (Canterbury City Council). 2003. Riverside Strategy. Supplementary Planning Guidance. 12 pp. [Not currently available.]
CCC (Canterbury City Council). 2017. Canterbury District Local Plan. Adopted July 2017. Available at: https://www2.canterbury.gov.uk/media/1507001/Canterbury-District-Loc... [accessed 20/06/2019].
Chandler PJ. 2020. An update of the 1998 Checklist of Diptera of the British Isles. [updated 15 January 2020]. Available at https://www.dipterists.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdf/BRITISH%20ISLE...
Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. PRIMER v6: User Manual/tutorial. Primer-E Ltd Plymouth.
Colwell RK, Rahbek C, Gotelli NJ. 2004. The mid‐domain effect and species richness patterns: what have we learned so far? Am Nat. 163:E1–E23. https://doi.org/10.1086/382056.
Cranston PS. 1982. A key to the larvae of the British Orthocladiinae (Chironomidae). Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication. (45):1–152.
Czechowski P, Stevens MI, Madden C, Weinstein P. 2020. Steps towards a more efficient use of chironomids as bioindicators for freshwater bioassessment: exploiting eDNA and other genetic tools. Ecol Indic. 110:105868. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105868.
DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs). 2014. Water Framework Directive implementation in England and Wales: new and updated standards to protect the water environment. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data... [accessed 20/06/2019].
Drake CM. 1983. Spatial distribution of chironomid larvae (Diptera) on leaves of the bulrush in a chalk stream. J Anim Ecol. 52:421–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/4563.
Ekrem T, Willassen E, Stur E. 2007. A comprehensive DNA sequence library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 43:530–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.021.
Environment Agency. 2016. Water for life and livelihoods. Part 1: South East river basin district River basin management plan. Updated: December 2015. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/u... [accessed 23/08/2020].
Environment Agency and English Nature. 2004. The state of England’s chalk rivers: a report by the UK biodiversity action plan steering group for chalk rivers. Available at: http://adlib.everysite.co.uk/adlib/defra/content.aspx?doc=57246&... [accessed 9/07/2019].
Frouz J, Matena J, Ali A. 2003. Survival strategies of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) living in temporary habitats: a review. Eur J Entomol. 100: 459–465.
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 4:1–9.
Harrison SSC, Harris IT. 2002. The effects of bankside management on chalk stream invertebrate communities. Freshwater Biol. 47:2233–2245. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00939.x.
Hill MO, Šmilauer P. 2005 TWINSPAN for Windows version 2.3. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice.
Justus J, Sarkar S. 2002. The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: A preliminary history. J Biosci. 27:421–435.
KCC (Kent County Council) 2005. Water & wastewater, particularly in Ashford. Select Committee Report (62 pp.). Available at https://www.kent.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/12849/water-wast... [accessed 20/06/2019].
Kent Biodiversity Action Plan – A framework for the future of Kent’s wildlife. 1997. Maidstone: Kent Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group. Available at https://www.medway.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/279/kent_biodiversit... [accessed 02/07/2020].
Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. J Anim Ecol. 72:367–382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x.
Ladle M, Westlake DF. 2006. River and stream ecosystems of Great Britain. In: Cushing CE, Cummins, KW, Minshall GW, editors. River and stream ecosystems of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press; p. 343–388.
Leménager T, King D, Elliott J, Elliott J, Gibbons H, King A. 2014. Greater than the sum of their parts: Exploring the environmental complementarity of state, private and community protected areas. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2:238–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.09.009.
Mainstone, CP. 1999. Chalk rivers: nature conservation and management. Peterborough: English Nature and Environment Agency.
Margules C, Sarkar, S. 2007. Systematic conservation planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McConkey V. 2017. DNA-barcoding for the inference of larval community structure of non-biting midges (Chironomidae) from the River Stour, Kent. MSc. thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University.
Móra A, Szivák I. 2012. Spatial distribution and diversity of chironomid assemblages in a small hilly stream (Diptera: Chironomidae). Aquat Insect. 34:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650424.2012.643042.
Nicacio G, Juen L. 2015. Chironomids as indicators in freshwater ecosystems: an assessment of the literature. Insect Conserv Divers. 8:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12123.
NRA (National Rivers Authority). 1994. Kentish Stour Catchment Management Plan Consultation Report. National Rivers Authority Southern Region. Available at: http://www.environmentdata.org/fedora/repository/ealit:3760/OBJ/20002398.pdf [accessed 28/09/2015].
O’Neill R, Hughes K. 2014. The state of England’s chalk streams. Surrey: WWF-UK.
Pearce F. 2014. The threat to chalk streams, our unique contribution to global ecology. The Guardian [newspaper]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/jul/24/threat-chalk-st... [accessed 01/07/2019].
Pinder LCV. 1977. The Chironomidae and their ecology in chalk streams. In: Forty-fifth annual report for the year ended 31st March 1977. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association; p. 62–69.
Pinder LCV. 1986. Biology of freshwater Chironomidae. Annu Rev Entomol. 31:1–23.
Pinder LCV. 1989. Biological surveillance of chalk-streams. In: 57th Annual Report of water plants in lowland streams, Annual Report of the Freshwater Biological Association. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association; p. 81–92.
Pinder LCV, Morley DJ. 1995. Chironomidae as indicators of water quality with a comparison of the chironomid faunas of a series of contrasting Cumbrian Tarns. In: Harrington R, Stork NE, editors. Insects in a changing environment. London: Academic Press; p. 272–293.
Porinchu DF, MacDonald GM. 2003. The use and application of freshwater midges (Chironomidae: Insecta: Diptera) in geographical research. Prog Phys Geogr Earth Environ; 27:378–422. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133303pp388ra.
Prat N, Puntí T, Rieradevall M. 2016. The use of larvae and pupal exuviae to study the biodiversity of Chironomidae in Mediterranean streams. Journal of Entomological & Acarological Research. 48:29–36.
Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vane-Wright RI, Williams PH. 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol Evol. 8:124–128.
Puntí T, Rieradevall M, Prat N. 2007. Chironomidae assemblages in reference condition Mediterranean streams: environmental factors, seasonal variability and ecotypes. Fund Appl Limnol. 170:149–165.
Rae JG. 2013. Abiotic factors affect microhabitat selection and community dynamics in a sandy-bottom lotic chironomid midge assemblage. Hydrobiologia. 700:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1223-9.
Sampson A, Ings N, Shelley F, Tuffin S, Grey J, Trimmer M, Woodward G, Hildrew AG. 2019. Geographically widespread 13C‐depletion of grazing caddis larvae: A third way of fuelling stream food webs? Freshw Biol. 64: 787–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13262.
Sanders IA, Heppell CM, Cotton JA, Wharton G, Hildrew AG, Flowers EJ, Trimmer M. 2007. Emission of methane from chalk streams has potential implications for agricultural practices. Freshw Biol. 52: 1176–1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01745.x.
Sealock AW, Ferrington Jr LC. 2008. Sampling efficiency of Chironomidae (Diptera) across disturbance gradients. Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal (História Natural) Supplement. 13:85–92.
Smith KGV. 1989. An introduction to the immature stages of British flies; Diptera larvae, with notes on eggs, puparia and pupae. In: Dolling WR, Askew RR, editors. Handbooks for the identification of British insects, Vol. 10, Part 4. London: Royal Entomological Society of London.
Smith PA, Dosser J, Tero C, Kite N. 2003. A method to identify chalk rivers and assess their nature-conservation value. Water Environ J. 17:140–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2003.tb00450.x.
Stark JD, Boothroyd IKG, Harding JS, Maxted JR, Scarsbrook MR. 2001. Protocols for sampling macroinvertebrates in wadeable streams. New Zealand Macroinvertebrate Working Group Report No. 1. Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment. Sustainable Management Fund Project No. 5103.
Syrovátka V, Brabec K. 2006. Effects of physical factors on chironomid larvae distribution and community structure at a mesohabitat scale. Verh Internat Verein Limnol. 29:1845–1848.
Syrovátka V, Schenková J, Brabec K. 2009. The distribution of chironomid larvae and oligochaetes within a stony-bottomed river stretch: the role of substrate and hydraulic characteristics. Fund Appl Limnol. 174:43–62.
Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH. 1991. What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv. 55:235–254.
Visser A, Beevers L, Patidar S. 2019. The impact of climate change on hydroecological response in chalk streams. Water. 11:596. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030596.
Westwood CG, England J, Dunbar MJ, Holmes NTH, Leeming DJ, Hammond D. 2017. An approach to setting ecological flow thresholds for southern English chalk streams. Water Environ J. 31:528–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12275.
WFD-UK-TAG (Water Framework Directive UK Technical Advisory Group). 2012. Updated Recommendations on Environmental Standards. River Basin Management (2015–21). Available at: http://www.wfduk.org/sites/default/files/Media/UKTAG%20Summary%20Rep... [accessed 29/09/2015].
Wiederholm T. 1983. Chironomidae of the Holarctic region, keys and diagnosis. Part 1: Larvae. Entomol Scand. Supplement 19.
Williams VL, Witkowski ETF, Balkwill K. 2007. The use of incidence-based species richness estimators, species accumulation curves and similarity measures to appraise ethnobotanical inventories from South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 16:2495–2513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9026-9.
Wilson RS, Ruse LP. 2005. A guide to the identification of genera of chironomid pupal exuviae occurring in Britain and Ireland (including common genera from northern Europe) and their use in monitoring lotic and lentic fresh waters. Ambleside: Freshwater Biological Association.
Wood PJ, Petts GE. 1999. The influence of drought on chalk stream macroinvertebrates. Hydrol Process. 13:387–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990228)13:3<387::AID-HYP745>3.0.CO;2-R.
Wright JF, Berrie AD. 1987. Ecological effects of groundwater pumping and a natural drought on the upper reaches of a chalk stream. Regul Rivers Res Manag. 1:145–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450010205.
Wright JF, Symes KL. 1999. A nine-year study of the macroinvertebrate fauna of a chalk stream. Hydrol Process. 13:371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990228)13:3<371::AID-HYP744>3.0.CO;2-C. |
|---|