Anti-abortion rhetoric and the undermining of choice: Women’s agency as causing “psychological trauma” following the termination of a pregnancy

Journal article


Ntontis, E. 2019. Anti-abortion rhetoric and the undermining of choice: Women’s agency as causing “psychological trauma” following the termination of a pregnancy. Political Psychology. 41 (3), pp. 517-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12634
AuthorsNtontis, E.
Abstract

Historically the anti-abortion movement has opposed abortions through reference to the fetus' human status. However, recently there has been a rhetorical shift whereby abortion is criticized based on its alleged negative psychological impact on women, with some authors voicing concerns related to this medicalized repertoire undermining women's capacity to act as rational decision-makers. However, no research to date has systematically analyzed how women’s agency over their abortions features in anti-abortion rhetoric. In this discourse analysis of interviews with 15 anti-abortion supporters, I explore how psychological concepts are employed to indirectly undermine women's agency to abort. Participants construct the termination of a pregnancy as psychologically damaging when women’s agency is evident (e.g., in abortions or rape pregnancy abortions). Also women's choice appears as enforced by society, victimizing them and removing accountability over it. However, unintentional termination (e.g., miscarriage) is constructed as “natural” and psychologically harmless due to the lack of agency. Overall, the pathologization of abortion through reference to psychological trauma stemming from the exercise of agency allows anti-abortionists to naturalize motherhood and oppose abortions in an “objective”, depoliticized, non-restrictive, and pro-woman manner, without explicitly disregarding women’s ability to choose or breaching Western norms of autonomy and freedom of choice.

Keywordstrauma; framing; motherhood; anti-abortion; abortion; pro-life movement
Year2019
JournalPolitical Psychology
Journal citation41 (3), pp. 517-532
PublisherBlackwell
ISSN0162-895X
1427-9221
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12634
Official URLhttps://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12634
Publication dates
Online20 Oct 2019
PrintJun 2020
Publication process dates
Deposited30 Sep 2019
Accepted29 Sep 2019
Accepted author manuscript
License
Output statusPublished
References

Adler, N. E., David, H. P., Major, B. N., Roth, S. H., Russo, N. F., & Wyatt, G. E. (1990). Psychological responses after abortion. Science, 248(4951), 41–44.
Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–80). Oxford, UK: Addison-Wesley.
APA, Major, B., & Association, A. P. (2008). Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Washington: APA. Retrieved from http://www.en.federa.org.pl/dokumenty_pdf/podrzednegora/abortion-rep...
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives On Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology. 26, 611-639 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Biggs, M. A., Upadhyay, U. D., McCulloch, C. E., & Foster, D. G. (2017). Women’s mental health and well-being 5 years after receiving or being denied an abortion: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
Bliuc, A.-M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion-based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.334
Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behaviour. Social Problems, 18(3), 298–306. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2307/799797
Boseley, S., Maclean, R., & Ford, L. (2017). Boseley, S., Maclean, R., & Ford, L. (2017, July 22). How one of Trump’s first acts signed death warrants for women all around the world. The Guardian. The Guardian.
Burke, S., & Goodman, S. (2012). “Bring back Hitler’s gas chambers”: Asylum seeking, Nazis and facebook - a discursive analysis. Discourse and Society, 23(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431036
Cannold, L. (2002). Understanding and responding to anti-choice women-centred strategies. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19), 171–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00011-3
Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1973). The political uses of symbolism. American Politics Quarterly, 1(2), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7300100302
Condit, C. M. (1990). Decoding Abortion Rhetoric: Communicating Social Change. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Dadlez, E. M., & Andrews, W. L. (2010). Post-abortion syndrome: Creating an affliction. Bioethics, 24, 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01739.x
Daniels, C. (1993). At women’s expense: State power and the politics of fetal rights. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Drury, J, & Reicher, S.D. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642
Drury, J., Cocking, C., Beale, J., Hanson, C., & Rapley, F. (2005). The phenomenology of empowerment in collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X18523
Drury, J., & Reicher, S.D. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x
Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretive repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Simeon Yates (eds), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: Sage.
Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, 5(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953001
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: SAGE.
Elder, C. D., & Cobb, R. . (1983). The political uses of symbols. New York: Longman.
Every, D., & Augoustinos, M. (2008). Constructions of Australia in pro- and anti-asylum seeker political discourse. Nations and Nationalism, 14(3), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2008.00356.x
Friedman, A. D. (2013). Bad medicine: Abortion and the battle over who Speaks for women’s health. Wm. & Mary J. Women & L, 20(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23.
Hamilton, P. (1992). The Enlightenment and the birth of social science. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 17–70). Oxford: Polity Press.
Himmelweit, S. (1988). More than’a woman’s right to choose’? Feminist Review, 29, 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1988.22
Hopkins, N., & Reicher, S.D. (1997). Social movement rhetoric and the social psychology of collective action: A Case Study of Anti-Abortion Mobilization. Human Relations, 50(3), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000303
Hopkins, N., & Reicher, S.D. (1992). Anti-abortion propaganda: A critical analysis. Critical Social Policy, 12(35), 64–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839201203504
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S.D, & Saleem, J. (1996). Constructing women’s psychological health in anti-abortion rhetoric. Sociological Review, 44(3), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1996.tb00436.x
Hopkins, N., Zeedyk, S.D, & Raitt, F. (2005). Visualising abortion: Emotion discourse and fetal imagery in a contemporary abortion debate. Social Science and Medicine, 61(2), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.049
Jasper, J. M. (2017). The doors that culture opened: Parallels between social movement studies and social psychology. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216686405
Jay, S., & Muldoon, O. T. (2018). Social class and models of agency: Independent and interdependent agency as educational (dis)advantage. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2370
Kelley, J., Evans, M. D., & Headey, B. (1993). Moral reasoning and political conflict: the abortion controversy. The British Journal of Sociology, 44(4), 589–612.
Kelly, K. (2014). The spread of “Post Abortion Syndrome” as social diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine, 102, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.030
Kirkwood, S., Goodman, S., McVittie, C., & McKinlay, A. (2016). The language of asylum Refugees and discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-46116-2
Lee, E. (2003). Abortion, motherhood and mental health: Medicalizing reproduction in the Unites States and Great Britain. New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Lowe, P., & Page, S.-J. (2018). ‘On the wet side of the womb’: The construction of ‘mothers’ in anti-abortion activism in England and Wales. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 135050681878519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818785191
Maienschein, J. (2007). What is an “Embryo” and how do we know? In D. L. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (p. 513). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. (2000). The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01761.x
Mikołajczak, M., & Bilewicz, M. (2015). Foetus or child? Abortion discourse and attributions of humanness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12096
Morgan, L. M. (1989). When does life begin? A cross-cultural perspective. In E. Doerr & J. Prescott (Eds.), Abortion and fetal personhood (pp. 89–107). Centerline Press.: Long Beach, CA.
Morgan, L. M. (1997). Imagining the unborn in the Ecuadoran Andes. Feminist Studies, 23(2), 323–350.
Munk-Olsen, T., Laursen, T. M., Pedersen, C. B., Lidegaard, Ø., & Mortensen, P. B. (2011). Induced first-trimester abortion and risk of mental disorder. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(4), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0905882
Ntontis, E., & Hopkins, N. (2018). Framing a ‘social problem’’: Emotion in anti-abortion activists’ depiction of the abortion debate.’ British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12249
Papastamou, S. (1986). Psychologization and processes of minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420160205
Petchesky, R. P. (1987). Foetal Images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies, 13(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177802
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222119
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage Publications (CA).
Purcell, C., Brown, A., Melville, C., & McDaid, L. M. (2017). Women’s embodied experiences of second trimester medical abortion. Feminism and Psychology, 27(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517692606
Reicher, S. D., & Hopkins, N. (1996). Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: an analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01099.x
Reicher, S. D., Hopkins, N., Levine, M., & Rath, R. (2005). Entrepreneurs of hate and entrepreneurs of solidarity: Social identity as a basis for mass communication. International Review of the Red Cross, 87(860), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383100184462
Reicher, S.D., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. London: SAGE.
Reicher, S.D., Cassidy, C., Wolpert, I., Hopkins, N., & Levine, M. (2006). Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.291
Robinson, G. E., Stotland, N. L., Russo, N. F., Lang, J. A., & Occhiogrosso, M. (2009). Is there an “abortion trauma syndrome”? Critiquing the evidence. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 17, 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220903149119
Rose, M. (2011). Pro-life, pro-woman? Frame extension in the American antiabortion movement. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 32(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.537565
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.
Saurette, P., & Gordon, K. (2013). Arguing abortion: The new anti-abortion discourse in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423913000176
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (2002). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1590-5
Speckhard, A. C., & Rue, V. M. (1992). Postabortion Syndrome: An emerging public health concern. Journal of Social Issues, 48(3), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00899.x
Stabile, C. (1992). Shooting the mother: Fetal photography and the politics of disappearance. Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies, 10(1 28), 178–205. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-10-1_28-178
Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the “poll tax riot.” Human Relations, 53(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/a010563
Tribe, L. H. (1992). Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: Norton.
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
Van Zomeren, M., & Spears, R. (2009). Metaphors of protest: A classification of motivations for collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01619.x
Vice. (2019). Κίνημα Κατά των Εκτρώσεων Έπεισε την Εκκλησία να Ορίσει «Μέρα του Αγέννητου Παιδιού». Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/gr/article/j5ww9g/kinhma-kata-twn-ektrwsewn-epe... Last accessed: 6/9/2019
Walkerdine, V. (2003). Reclassifying upward mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject. Gender and Education, 15(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250303864
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.
Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9(3), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353599009003012
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Xenitidou, M., & Sapountzis, A. (2018). Admissions of racism in discourse on migration in Greece: Beyond the norm against prejudice? European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(6), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2364

ContributorsNtontis, E.
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/89108/anti-abortion-rhetoric-and-the-undermining-of-choice-women-s-agency-as-causing-psychological-trauma-following-the-termination-of-a-pregnancy

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
  • 757
    total views
  • 167
    total downloads
  • 14
    views this month
  • 5
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The dynamics of leadership and resistance in repressive regimes: The cases of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic and Polish People’s Republic
Jurstakova, K., Ntontis, E. and Nigbur, D. The dynamics of leadership and resistance in repressive regimes: The cases of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic and Polish People’s Republic. in: Bou Zeineddine, F. and Vollhardt, J.R. (ed.) The Psychology of Resistance in Violent and Repressive Contexts
A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack
Ntontis, E., Jurstakova, K., Neville, F., Haslam, S.A. and Reicher, S.D. 2023. A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack. British Journal of Social Psychology. 63 (1), pp. 3-19.
A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack
Ntontis, E., Jurstakova, K., Neville, F. and Reicher, S. 2023. A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack. British Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12679
Impresarios of identity: How the leaders of Czechoslovakia's ‘Candlelight Demonstration’ enabled effective collective action in a context of repression
Jurstakova, K., Ntontis, E. and Reicher, S. 2023. Impresarios of identity: How the leaders of Czechoslovakia's ‘Candlelight Demonstration’ enabled effective collective action in a context of repression. British Journal of Social Psychology. 63 (1), pp. 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12671
Examining the role of Donald Trump and his supporters in the 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol: A dual-agency model of identity leadership and engaged followership
Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D., Selvanathan, H.P., Gaffney, A., Steffens, N.K., Packer, D., Van Bavel, J., Ntontis, E., Neville, F., Vestergren, S., Jurstakova, K. and Platow, M. 2022. Examining the role of Donald Trump and his supporters in the 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol: A dual-agency model of identity leadership and engaged followership. The Leadership Quarterly. 34 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101622
Collective victimhood in populist media about Brexit: rage against the machine?
Nigbur, D., Williams, E., Layton, A., Tsirogianni, S., Ntontis, E., Hoerst, C., Jemwa, A. and Volkers Poile, I. 2022. Collective victimhood in populist media about Brexit: rage against the machine?
Tracking the nature and trajectory of social support in Facebook mutual aid groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ntontis, Evangelos, Fernandes-Jesus, Maria, Mao, Guanlan, Dines, Tom, Kane, Jazmin, Karakaya, Joshua, Perach, Rotem, Cocking, Chris, McTague, Michael, Schwarz, Anna, Semlyen, Joanna and Drury, John 2022. Tracking the nature and trajectory of social support in Facebook mutual aid groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction : IJDRR. 76, p. 103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103043
Is it really "panic buying"? Public perceptions and experiences of extra buying at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ntontis, E., Vestergren, S., Saavedra, Patricio, Neville, F., Jurstakova, K., Cocking, C., Lay, S., Drury, J., Stott, Clifford, Reicher, Stephen and Vignoles, Vivian L 2022. Is it really "panic buying"? Public perceptions and experiences of extra buying at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 17 (2), p. e0264618. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264618
Glass children: The lived experiences of siblings of people with a disability or chronic illness
Hanvey, I., Malovic, A. and Ntontis, E. 2022. Glass children: The lived experiences of siblings of people with a disability or chronic illness. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 32 (5), pp. 936-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2602
How participation in Covid‐19 mutual aid groups affects subjective well‐being and how political identity moderates these effects
Mao, G., Drury, J., Fernandes-Jesus, M. and Ntontis, E. 2021. How participation in Covid‐19 mutual aid groups affects subjective well‐being and how political identity moderates these effects. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12275
What have we learned about COVID-19 volunteering in the UK? A rapid review of the literature.
Mao, Guanlan, Fernandes-Jesus, M., Ntontis, Evangelos and Drury, John 2021. What have we learned about COVID-19 volunteering in the UK? A rapid review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 21 (1), p. 1470. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11390-8
Harnessing shared identities to mobilise resilient responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
Vignoles, V., Jaser, Z., Taylor, F. and Ntontis, E. 2020. Harnessing shared identities to mobilise resilient responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12726
Collective resilience in the disaster recovery period: Emergent social identity and observed social support are associated with collective efficacy, wellbeing, and the provision of social support
Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlot, R., Rubin, J., Williams, R. and Saavedra, P. 2020. Collective resilience in the disaster recovery period: Emergent social identity and observed social support are associated with collective efficacy, wellbeing, and the provision of social support. British Journal of Social Psychology. 60 (3), pp. 1075-1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12434
Public behaviour in response to the Covid-19 pandemic: Understanding the role of group processes
Drury, J., Carter, H., Ntontis, E. and Tekin-Guven, S. 2020. Public behaviour in response to the Covid-19 pandemic: Understanding the role of group processes. BJPsych OPEN. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.139
Solidarity
Ntontis, E. and Rocha, C. 2020. Solidarity. in: Jetten, J., Reicher, S.D., Haslam, S.A. and Cruwys, T. (ed.) Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19 SAGE. pp. 102-106
“An important part of who I am”: The predictors of dietary adherence among weight-loss, vegetarian, vegan, paleo, and gluten-free dietary groups
Cruwys, T., Norwood, R., Chachay, V.S., Ntontis, E. and Sheffield, J. 2020. “An important part of who I am”: The predictors of dietary adherence among weight-loss, vegetarian, vegan, paleo, and gluten-free dietary groups. Nutrients. 12 (4), p. 970. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12040970
Endurance or decline of emergent groups following a flood disaster: implications for community resilience
Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlot, R., Rubin, G. J. and Williams, R. 2020. Endurance or decline of emergent groups following a flood disaster: implications for community resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101493
What lies beyond social capital? the role of social psychology in building community resilience to climate change
Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlôt, E., Rubin, G. and Williams, R. 2019. What lies beyond social capital? the role of social psychology in building community resilience to climate change. Traumatology. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000221
Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach
Drury, J., Carter, H., Cocking, C., Ntontis, E., Tekin Guven, S. and Amlôt, R. 2019. Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Frontiers in Public Health. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00141
A glossary for research on human crowd dynamics
Adrian, J., Bode, N., Amos, M., Baratchi, M., Beermann, M., Boltes, M., Corbetta, A., Dezecache, G., Drury, J., Fu, Z., Geraerts, R., Gwynne, S., Hofinger, G., Hunt, A., Kanters, T., Kneidl, A., Konya, K., Köster, G., Küpper, M., Michalareas, G., Neville, F., Ntontis, E., Reicher, S., Ronchi, E., Schadschneider, A., Seyfried, A., Shipman, A., Sieben, A., Spearpoint, M., Sullivan, G., Templeton, A., Toschi, F., Yücel, Z., Zanlungo, F., Zuriguel, I., Van der Wal, N., van Schadewijk, F., von Krüchten, C. and Wijermans, N. 2019. A glossary for research on human crowd dynamics. Collective Dynamics. 4, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17815/CD.2019.19
Community resilience and flooding in UK guidance: a critical review of concepts, definitions, and their implications
Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. and Williams, R. 2018. Community resilience and flooding in UK guidance: a critical review of concepts, definitions, and their implications. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12223
PhD supervisors and faculty members might help to avoid burnout as well as enhance engagement and organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) among PhD students.
Saavedra, P., Ntontis, E. and Kyprianides, A. 2018. PhD supervisors and faculty members might help to avoid burnout as well as enhance engagement and organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) among PhD students. University of Sussex. https://doi.org/10.20919/Psych(2019).001
Framing a ‘social problem': emotion in anti-abortion activists' depiction of the abortion debate
Ntontis, E. and Hopkins, N. 2018. Framing a ‘social problem': emotion in anti-abortion activists' depiction of the abortion debate. British Journal of Social Psychology. 57 (3), pp. 666-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12249
Emergent social identities in a flood: implications for community psychosocial resilience
Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. and Williams, R. 2017. Emergent social identities in a flood: implications for community psychosocial resilience. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 28 (1), pp. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2329