Minute by minute: building student-teacher relationships in initial teacher education

Journal article


King, H. 2018. Minute by minute: building student-teacher relationships in initial teacher education. Teacher Education Advancement Network. 10 (2), pp. 50-64.
AuthorsKing, H.
Abstract

In their training, student teachers are introduced to the effectiveness of formative assessment, which relies on the teacher having in-depth understanding of their learners. Ironically, this personal understanding is not always modelled in university sessions; with tutors struggling to learn the names, let alone the individual needs of their learners.

In this action research project, an inductive approach was used to evaluate the development of student-teacher relationships through written dialogue, building on research on the ‘one-minute paper’. The teacher completed a reflective diary throughout the project and the students’ views on the value of written dialogues were collected by means of a questionnaire. Students were positive about the benefits of using ‘one-minute papers’, and content analysis of the questionnaire responses drew out themes around personal student-teacher relationships and how these can support student learning.

This paper concludes by discussing the importance of making learning explicit for student teachers and using teaching approaches that nurture student-teacher relationships (such as ‘one-minute papers’) to empower students to become partners in the business of learning.

KeywordsInitial teacher education; one-minute paper; student-teacher relationship; action research; student agency; student partnership
Year2018
JournalTeacher Education Advancement Network
Journal citation10 (2), pp. 50-64
PublisherUniversity of Cumbria
ISSN2054-5266
Official URLhttps://ojs.cumbria.ac.uk/index.php/TEAN
Publication dates
Print23 May 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited24 May 2018
Accepted05 Mar 2018
Output statusPublished
References

Almer, E., Jones, K. and Moeckel, C. (1998) ‘The Impact of One-Minute Papers on Learning in an Introductory Accounting Course’, Issues in Accounting Education, 13(3), pp. 485-497.
Anderson, L. E., Carta-Falsa, J. (2002) ‘Factors That Make Faculty and Student Relationships Effective’, College Teaching, 50(4), pp. 134-138.
Angelo, T. and Cross, K. (1993) Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. 2nd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bartell, T. G. (2011) ‘Caring, Race, Culture, and Power: A Research Synthesis Toward Supporting Mathematics Teachers in Caring with Awareness’, Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(1), pp. 50-74.
British Educational Research Association (2011) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Ethical-Guide... (Accessed: 26 July 2017).
Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) ‘Assessment and Classroom Learning’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp. 7-74.
Chizmar, J. and Ostrosky, A. (1998) ‘The One-Minute Paper: Some Empirical Findings’, Journal of Economic Education, 29(1), pp. 3-10.
Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V., Hounsell, J. and McCune, V. (2008) ‘‘A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: learning to be a university student’, Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), pp. 567-581.
Clegg, S., Bradley, S. and Smith, K. (2006) ‘ ‘I’ve had to swallow my pride’: Help, seeking and self-esteem’, Higher Education Research and Development, 25(2), pp. 101-113.
Costello, M., Weldon, A. and Brunner, P. (2002) ‘Research Cards as a Formative Evaluation Tool: Students’ perceptions of how their use impacted classes’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), pp. 23-33.
Department for Education (2016) Eliminating unnecessary workload around marking: report of the independent teacher workload review group. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-teacher-workload... (Accessed 1 Aug 2017).
Elliott, V., Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T., Ingram, J., Thompson, I., Usher, N., Zantout, M., Richardson, J. and Coleman, R. (2016) A marked improvement?: A review of the evidence on written marking. London: Education Endowment Foundation. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Publication... (Accessed 1 Aug 2017).
Gray, D. E. (2014) Doing Research in the Real World. 3rd edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hackenberg, A. J. (2010) ‘Mathematical Caring Relations in Action’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(3), pp. 236-273.
Hagenauer, G. and Volet, S. E. (2014) ‘Teacher-student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field’, Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), pp. 370-388.
HEA (2014) Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_throug... (Accessed 1 August 2017).
Johnson, R. B. and Christensen, L. (2014) Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. 5th edn. London: SAGE.
Lochmiller, C. R. and Lester, J. N. (2017) An Introduction to Educational Research: Connecting Methods to Practice. London: SAGE.
McArthur, J., Huxham, M., Hounsell, J. and Warsop, C. (2011) Tipping out the Boot Grit: the use of on-going feedback devices to enhance feedback dialogue. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/tipping-out-boot-grit-use-... (Accessed: 29 July 2017).
McNiff, J. (2016) You and Your Action Research Project. 4th edn. Abingdon: Routledge.
Newby, P. (2014) Research Methods for Education. 2nd edn. Abingdon: Routledge.
Patka, M., Wallin-Ruschman, J., Wallace, T. and Robbins, C. (2016) ‘Exit cards: creating a dialogue for continuous evaluation’, Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), pp. 659-668.
Philpott, C. (2014) ‘A pedagogy for initial teacher education in England’, TEAN Journal, 6(3), pp. 4-16.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2010) Rethinking the values of higher education – students as change agents. Gloucester: QAA. Available at: www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Rethinking-the-values-of-higher-education---students-as-change-agents.pdf (Accessed: 29 July 2017).
Quinlan, K. M. (2016) ‘How Emotion Matters in Four Key Relationships in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education’, College Teaching, 64(3), pp. 101-111.
Rose, S. (1996) ‘Attendance Cards – More Than Drudgery’, The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 5(6), pp. 11-12.
Stead, D. (2005) ‘A review of the one-minute paper’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(2), pp. 118-131.
Stephen, D., O’Connell, P. and Hall, M. (2008) ‘“Going the extra mile”, “fire fighting”, or laissez-faire?: Re-evaluating personal tutoring relationships within mass higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), pp. 449-460.
Swinkels, M., Koopman, M. and Beijaard, D. (2013) ‘Student teachers’ development of learning-focused conceptions’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, pp. 26-37.
Thomas, L. (2012) Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention and Success programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/building-student-engagemen... (Accessed 1 August 2017).
Wellington, J. (2015) Educational Research: Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. 2nd edn. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Witt, M., Goode, M. and Ibbett, C. (2013) ‘What does it take to make a primary maths teacher? Two trainee teachers’ successful mathematical journeys’, Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 5(1), pp. 19-32.

Additional information

Open Access

Publisher's version
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/88v08/minute-by-minute-building-student-teacher-relationships-in-initial-teacher-education

Download files

Publisher's version
  • 6
    total views
  • 13
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Fishing for evidence of impact
Rowland, G., King, H., Webb, P., Cogger, A. and Vincent, K. 2018. Fishing for evidence of impact. Professional Development Today. 19 (3-4), pp. 76-85.