The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for trauma examinations of the skeletal system in 4 NHS trusts. NHS Executive South Thames funded research project

Research report


Piper, K., Paterson, A. and Ryan, C. 1999. The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for trauma examinations of the skeletal system in 4 NHS trusts. NHS Executive South Thames funded research project. Canterbury Christ Church University.
AuthorsPiper, K., Paterson, A. and Ryan, C.
TypeResearch report
Abstract

Executive Summary

The implementation of a Radiographic Reporting Service for trauma examinations of the skeletal system, in 4 National Health Service Trusts

Project Reference: SPGS 438
Project Dates: 1 September 1997 (project start) 30 November 1998 (project end)
31 March 1999: Date of report submission
Project Leader: Mr Keith Piper, Senior Lecturer and Programme Director, PgD Clinical Reporting *
Research Assistant: Ms Carol Ryan, Department of Radiography *
Project Supervisor: Mrs Audrey Paterson, Dean of Faculty of Health and Sciences and
Head of Department of Radiography *
* Canterbury Christ Church University College

Main Research Objectives
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the implementation of a Radiographic Reporting Service (RRS) in four NHS Trusts in the United Kingdom with specific reference to the reporting by radiographers of musculo-skeletal trauma examinations. The research investigated the accuracy of radiographers’ written reports in terms of sensitivity and specificity; the impact on patient care and management as measured by the volume of reporting activity undertaken and the speed with which reports became available; costs related to the implementation of an RRR, and satisfaction of the users of the service.

Methodology and Sample Size
A longitudinal study design was used to measure the productivity and effectiveness of radiographic reporting in four NHS Trusts and five clinical sites in England. Data were collected by direct measure, report pro-forma, semi-structured questionnaires and interviews. A series of base line measurements were made at the commencement of the project. These were the volume of reporting activity prior to implementation of an RRS and the speed with which the reports became available. The satisfaction of the users of the reporting service prior to the implementation of an RRS was also gauged. Three measures (volume, speed, satisfaction of users) were repeated after the RRS had been implemented. Longitudinal data on the accuracy of the radiographers’ reports in terms of sensitivity and specificity were also collected at each site. Finally, some cost information related to the introduction and provision of an RRS was gathered.
Four NHS Trusts and 10 radiographers participated in the study. Radiographers completed 10275 reports and 7179 were used to assess accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Volume and speed data were obtained from the normal workload in each Trust. Four radiology services managers provided the cost data, while 26 staff took part in the initial survey and 12 in the final survey.

Problems
The major problem with this study was the fact that it was investigating the implementation into practice of a new and controversial service. It was beset, therefore, with the difficulties of aligning a research project to practice and this was only possible imperfectly. Points of implementation of the new service varied considerably, workload of key staff made verification of reports difficult and information systems within Trusts proved problematic.

Findings
Radiographers’ reports were accurate and consistently so over time. Significant improvements in the volume of reporting activity were found post-implementation at 2 of the 4 clinical sites in which this was measured. Additionally, the speed with which reports became available was shown to have improved significantly in all 4 NHS Trusts (but not at one clinical site). Cost data was not considered to be reliable and more evaluation of costs is required. Users of the radiographic reporting services were extremely or very satisfied with the quality of reports produced by the radiographers and also satisfied with the nature of the service implemented. Finally, a range of organisational issues were seen to affect the implementation of these services, at times quite inappropriately.

Conclusion
NHS Trusts that are unable to provide a full and/or timely musculo-skeletal trauma reporting service should implement a radiographic reporting service but must ensure that this is properly planned, funded, implemented and managed. Monitoring of service effectiveness and auditing of reporting standards should take place periodically.

Acknowledgements
The four collaborating NHS Trusts and their staff; Expert panel members; Members of the Steering Group; Colleagues at Canterbury Christ Church University College, and the Research and Development Directorate at South Thames Regional Office (NHSE).

Year1999
PublisherCanterbury Christ Church University
Output statusPublished
File
Publication dates
Print31 Mar 1999
Publication process dates
Deposited03 Mar 2014
FunderNHSE - South Thames
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/8710z/the-implementation-of-a-radiographic-reporting-service-for-trauma-examinations-of-the-skeletal-system-in-4-nhs-trusts-nhs-executive-south-thames-funded-research-project

Download files

  • 10
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Concordance between a neuroradiologist, a consultant radiologist and trained reporting radiographers interpreting MRI head examinations: An empirical study
Piper, K., Mitchell, M., Griffin, K., Morgan,T., Thomas, A., Pittock, L., Woznitza, N. and Faruqui, R. 2020. Concordance between a neuroradiologist, a consultant radiologist and trained reporting radiographers interpreting MRI head examinations: An empirical study. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.10.016
Impact of radiographer immediate reporting of chest x-rays from general practice on the lung cancer pathway (radioX)
Woznitza, N., Devaraj, A., Janes, S., Duffy, S., Rowe, S., Bhowmik, A., Maughn, S., Piper, K. and Baldwin, D. 2019. Impact of radiographer immediate reporting of chest x-rays from general practice on the lung cancer pathway (radioX).
Radiographer reporting of neurological magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the head and cervical spine: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme
Piper, K., Pittock, L. and Woznitza, N. 2018. Radiographer reporting of neurological magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the head and cervical spine: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.05.006
Chest X-ray interpretation by Radiographers is not inferior to Radiologists: a multireader, multicase comparison using JAFROC (Jack-knife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics) analysis
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Burke, S. and Bothamley, G. 2018. Chest X-ray interpretation by Radiographers is not inferior to Radiologists: a multireader, multicase comparison using JAFROC (Jack-knife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics) analysis. Academic Radiology.
Agreement between expert thoracic radiologists and the chest radiograph reports provided by consultant radiologists and reporting radiographers in clinical practice: review of a single clinical site
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Burke, S., Ellis, S. and Bothamley, G. 2018. Agreement between expert thoracic radiologists and the chest radiograph reports provided by consultant radiologists and reporting radiographers in clinical practice: review of a single clinical site. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.01.009
Increasing radiology capacity within the lung cancer pathway: centralised work‐based support for trainee chest X‐ray reporting radiographers
Woznitza, N., Steele, R., Piper, K., Burke, S., Rowe, S., Bhowmik, A., Maughn, S. and Springett, K. 2018. Increasing radiology capacity within the lung cancer pathway: centralised work‐based support for trainee chest X‐ray reporting radiographers. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 65 (3), pp. 200-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.285
Immediate reporting of chest X-rays referred from general practice by reporting radiographers: a single centre feasibility study
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Rowe, S. and Bhowmik, A. 2017. Immediate reporting of chest X-rays referred from general practice by reporting radiographers: a single centre feasibility study. Clinical Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.016
Impact of radiographer immediate reporting of chest X-rays from general practice on the lung cancer pathway (radioX): study protocol for a randomised control trial
Woznitza, N., Devaraj, A., Janes, S., Duffy, S., Bhowmik, A., Rowe, S., Piper, K., Maughn, S. and Baldwin, D. 2017. Impact of radiographer immediate reporting of chest X-rays from general practice on the lung cancer pathway (radioX): study protocol for a randomised control trial. Trials. 18 (521). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2268-x
Radiographer reporting of magnetic resonance imaging breast examinations: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme
Pittock, L., Piper, K. and Woznitza, N. 2017. Radiographer reporting of magnetic resonance imaging breast examinations: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme.
Optimisation de la prise en charge en Rafiologie: Approts des manipulateurs experts interprétant des examens: Cas pratique au Royaume Uni
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., West, C. and Rowe, S. 2014. Optimisation de la prise en charge en Rafiologie: Approts des manipulateurs experts interprétant des examens: Cas pratique au Royaume Uni.
Chest x-ray agreement: comparative analysis between consultant radiologists, reporting radiographers and expert chest radiologists
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Burke, S., Ellis, S. and Bothamley, G. 2015. Chest x-ray agreement: comparative analysis between consultant radiologists, reporting radiographers and expert chest radiologists.
Team working in radiology: what is possible?
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Ratcliff, C., McGuinness, N. and Rowe, S. 2016. Team working in radiology: what is possible?
Chest x-ray interpretation by radiographers: diagnostic accuracy and influence on diagnostic reasoning
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Burke, S. and Bothamley, G. 2016. Chest x-ray interpretation by radiographers: diagnostic accuracy and influence on diagnostic reasoning.
Diagnostic accuracy of radiographer chest x-ray reporting
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Burke, S. and Bothamley, G. 2016. Diagnostic accuracy of radiographer chest x-ray reporting.
Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study
Lockwood, P., Pittock, L., Lockwood, C., Jeffery, C. and Piper, K. 2015. Intraorbital foreign body detection and localisation by radiographers: a preliminary JAFROC observer performance study. Radiography. 2015, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.06.005
AFROC analysis of reporting radiographer’s performance in CT head interpretation
Lockwood, P. and Piper, K. 2015. AFROC analysis of reporting radiographer’s performance in CT head interpretation. Radiography. 21 (3), pp. e90-e95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2015.04.001
CT head reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme
Lockwood, P. and Piper, K. 2013. CT head reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme.
Chest reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme.
Piper, K., Cox, S., Paterson, A., Thomas, A., Thomas, N., Jeyagopal, N. and Woznitza, N. 2014. Chest reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography. 20 (2), pp. 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.01.003
Adult chest radiograph reporting by radiographers: Preliminary data from an in-house audit programme
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Burke, S., Patel, K., Amin, S., Grayson, K. and Bothamley, G. 2014. Adult chest radiograph reporting by radiographers: Preliminary data from an in-house audit programme. Radiography. 20 (3), pp. 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.03.002
Optimizing patient care in radiology through team-working: A case study
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Rowe, S. and West, C. 2014. Optimizing patient care in radiology through team-working: A case study. Radiography. 20 (3), pp. 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.02.007
CT head reporting by radiographers: results of an accredited postgraduate programme
Lockwood, P., Piper, K. and Pittock, L. 2015. CT head reporting by radiographers: results of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography. 21 (3), pp. e85-e89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.12.001
Chest X-Ray interpretation: agreement between consultant radiologists and a reporting radiographer in clinical practice in the United Kingdom
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Burke, S., Patel, K., Amin, S. and Grayson, K. 2013. Chest X-Ray interpretation: agreement between consultant radiologists and a reporting radiographer in clinical practice in the United Kingdom.
Do you see what I see? Clinical review of discordant chest x-ray consultant radiologist and radiographer interpretations
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Bothamley, G. and Burke, S. 2014. Do you see what I see? Clinical review of discordant chest x-ray consultant radiologist and radiographer interpretations.
Agreement in neonatal x-ray interpretation: a comparison between consultant paediatric radiologists and a reporting radiographer
Woznitza, N., Piper, K., Aladangady, N., Iliadis, K., Prakash, R. and Santos, R. 2014. Agreement in neonatal x-ray interpretation: a comparison between consultant paediatric radiologists and a reporting radiographer.
Interpretation of clinical imagingexaminations by radiographers:a programme of research
Piper, K. 2014. Interpretation of clinical imagingexaminations by radiographers:a programme of research. PhD Thesis Canterbury Christ Church University Faculty of Health and Wellbeing
Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging examinations: selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist
Brealey, S., Piper, K., King, D., Bland, M., Caddick, J., Gibbon, A., Highland, A., Jenkins, N., Petty, D. and Warren, D. 2013. Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging examinations: selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist. European Journal of Radiology. 82 (10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.024
Skeletal reporting by radiographers: a review of 27800 cases
Piper, K. 2012. Skeletal reporting by radiographers: a review of 27800 cases.
ABCs of preliminary plain film image assessment
Williams, I. and Piper, K. 2012. ABCs of preliminary plain film image assessment.
Variation in accident and emergency musculoskeletal appendicular radiographic reports and the development of a report template
Paterson, A., Piper, K. and Ryan, C. 2001. Variation in accident and emergency musculoskeletal appendicular radiographic reports and the development of a report template. British Journal of Radiology. 74 (Supp.), p. 46.
Accuracy of radiographer reporting of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected acoustic neuroma
Gillmore, K., Piper, K., Byrne, J., Jeffree, M. and Millar, J. 2001. Accuracy of radiographer reporting of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected acoustic neuroma. British Journal of Radiology. 74 (S), p. 4.
The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for trauma examinations of the skeletal system
Piper, K. and Ryan, C. 1998. The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for trauma examinations of the skeletal system.
The development of a postgraduate diploma in Clinical Reporting (Radiography)
Davies, S., Piper, K., McKay, L. and Paterson, A. 1994. The development of a postgraduate diploma in Clinical Reporting (Radiography).
Using MRI for ankylosing spondylitis
Estall, H., Rennie, W. and Piper, K. 2012. Using MRI for ankylosing spondylitis. Imaging & Therapy Practice, Jan.
Clinical reporting in radiography: invited presentation
Piper, K. 1995. Clinical reporting in radiography: invited presentation.
The accuracy of radiographers' reports in accident and emergency examinations of the skeletal system
Piper, K. 1997. The accuracy of radiographers' reports in accident and emergency examinations of the skeletal system.
The accuracy of radiographers' reports in examinations of the skeletal system
Piper, K. 1997. The accuracy of radiographers' reports in examinations of the skeletal system.
Reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate skeletal reporting programme in the UK
Piper, K. 1997. Reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate skeletal reporting programme in the UK.
UK forges ahead with radiographer reporting
Thomas, A., Manning, D. and Piper, K. 2004. UK forges ahead with radiographer reporting. Diagnostic Imaging Europe, Feb/Mar.
The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for skeletal trauma
Paterson, A. and Piper, K. 1999. The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for skeletal trauma.
The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for skeletal trauma
Paterson, A. and Piper, K. 2000. The implementation of a radiographic reporting service for skeletal trauma.
The implementation of a radiographic reporting service
Piper, K. 2000. The implementation of a radiographic reporting service.
Abnormality detection in the appendicular skeleton: a practical workshop on professional responsibilities and subtle abnormalities
Piper, K. and Paterson, A. 2002. Abnormality detection in the appendicular skeleton: a practical workshop on professional responsibilities and subtle abnormalities.
MRI reporting by radiographers: the construction of an objective structured examination
Piper, K. 2007. MRI reporting by radiographers: the construction of an objective structured examination.
Chest reporting by radiographers
Piper, K. and Cox, S. 2011. Chest reporting by radiographers.
Can reporting radiographers produce clinically relevant reports?
Woznitza, N. and Piper, K. 2011. Can reporting radiographers produce clinically relevant reports?
Clinical reporting by radiographers in the UK
Piper, K. 2009. Clinical reporting by radiographers in the UK.
MRI reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme
Piper, K. and Thomas, N. 2008. MRI reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme.
MRI reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme
Piper, K., Buscall, K. and Thomas, N. 2010. MRI reporting by radiographers: findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography. 16 (2), pp. 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2009.10.017
Factors influencing the development and implementation of advanced and consultant radiographer practice – a review of the literature
Kelly, J., Piper, K. and Nightingale, J. 2008. Factors influencing the development and implementation of advanced and consultant radiographer practice – a review of the literature. Radiography. 14 (s1), pp. e71-e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2008.11.002
Reporting by radiographers: Neurological magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the head and cervical spine
Piper, K. 2009. Reporting by radiographers: Neurological magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the head and cervical spine.
Principles of image interpretation and search strategies
Williams, I. and Piper, K. 2010. Principles of image interpretation and search strategies.
Workshop to launch: ''Web-based short course in initial image interpretation of the appendicular skeleton''
Williams, I. and Piper, K. 2010. Workshop to launch: ''Web-based short course in initial image interpretation of the appendicular skeleton''.
Rationale for computed tomography head radiographer reporting
Williams, I. and Piper, K. 2010. Rationale for computed tomography head radiographer reporting.
Pre-testing of initial image interpretation skills
Williams, I. and Piper, K. 2010. Pre-testing of initial image interpretation skills.
Radiographer role development and image interpretation skills
Williams, I. and Piper, K. 2010. Radiographer role development and image interpretation skills.
Reporting for radiographers
Piper, K. and Field-Boden, Q. 1996. Reporting for radiographers. The Radiographer.
Clinical reporting in radiography
Piper, K. 1998. Clinical reporting in radiography.
ST funded research report - Implementation of a radiographic reporting service in four NHS Trusts: Initial findings
Piper, K. 1998. ST funded research report - Implementation of a radiographic reporting service in four NHS Trusts: Initial findings.
Accuracy of radiographers' reports in the interpretation of radiographic examinations of the skeletal system: a review of 6796 cases
Piper, K., Paterson, A. and Godfrey, R. 2005. Accuracy of radiographers' reports in the interpretation of radiographic examinations of the skeletal system: a review of 6796 cases. Radiography. 11 (1), pp. 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2004.05.004
A case study of a Baker's cyst
Piper, K. and Mitchell, M. 2007. A case study of a Baker's cyst. Synergy.
Initial image interpretation of appendicular skeletal radiographs: A comparison between nurses and radiographers
Piper, K. and Paterson, A. 2009. Initial image interpretation of appendicular skeletal radiographs: A comparison between nurses and radiographers. Radiography. 15 (1), pp. 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2007.10.006
Radiographic interpretation of the appendicular skeleton: A comparison between casualty officers, nurse practitioners and radiographers
Coleman, L. and Piper, K. 2009. Radiographic interpretation of the appendicular skeleton: A comparison between casualty officers, nurse practitioners and radiographers. Radiography. 15 (3), pp. 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2007.12.001
MRI reporting by radiographers: The construction of an objective structured examination
Piper, K. and Buscall, K. 2008. MRI reporting by radiographers: The construction of an objective structured examination. Radiography. 14 (2), pp. 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2007.02.003