Disrupting the third space through playfulness, mattering, and unbounded perspectives

This paper explores the evolving landscape of higher education in the UK, emphasising the diversity of the student population and the ensuing challenges for traditional university frameworks. It is framed through the concept of ‘third space’ professionals – individuals who operate beyond the conventional academic and administrative divides – to address these challenges (Whitchurch, 2013). The authors use reflective narratives that are diffracted through each other to shed light on the complexity of functioning in this innovative space. Their experiences of working-class origins, transitions from other sectors, and mature student pathways, illustrate how diversity enriches their engagement with students and their contribution to the university environment. The narrative showcases how third space professionals are pivotal in enhancing student success and promoting a more inclusive and student-focused university culture. They challenge existing academic hierarchies and bureaucratic norms, fostering a more adaptable and responsive educational setting. The paper highlights four third space practitioners’ creative and strategic approaches to navigating and reforming university structures whilst facing institutional resistance and systemic hurdles. Through principles of disruption, ethical practice, playfulness, and boundary-crossing, third space professionals are depicted as agents of cultural change, advocating for broader recognition and expansion of their roles in the academic ecosystem. In conclusion, the authors argue for the vital importance of the third space in higher education innovation, where the unique backgrounds of professionals significantly impact university transformation.

Ahn, M. Y. and Davis, H. H. (2019) ‘Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university’, Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), pp.622-634. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564902.

Akerman, K. (2022) ‘Close encounters of the third kind’, in McIntosh, E. and Nutt, D. (eds.) The impact of the integrated practitioner: studies in third space professionalism. London: Routledge, pp.96-201.

Andrews, J. and Clark, R. (2011) ‘Peer mentoring works! how peer mentoring enhances student success in higher education’, The Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/aston_what_works_final_repo... (Accessed: 10 January 2024).

Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.

Bennett, J. (2001) The enchantment of modern life: attachments, crossings and ethics. Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
Bingham, C. and Sidorkin, A. M. (2004) ‘The pedagogy of relation: an introduction’, Counterpoints, 259, pp.1-4.

Bochner, A. P. (2017) ‘Heart of the matter: a mini-manifesto for autoethnography’, International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(1), pp.67–80.

Bozalek, V. (2017) ‘Slow scholarship in writing retreats: a diffractive methodology for response-able pedagogies’, South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(2), pp.40-58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20853/31-2-1344.

Bozalek, V. and Zembylas, M. (2017) ‘Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166.

Braidotti, R. (2010) ‘The politics of “life itself”’, in Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds.) New materialisms: ontology, agency and politics. London: Duke University Press, pp.201-218.

Braidotti, R. (2012) ‘Nomadic ethics’, in Smith, D. And Somers-Hall, H. (eds.) The Cambridge companion to Deleuze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170-197.

Braidotti, R. (2013) The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Briggs, S. (2018) ‘Development of the ALDinHE recognition scheme: certifying the ‘learner developer’ title’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Issue 13, April, pp.1-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i13.461.

Campbell-Perry, S. (2022) ‘The blended professional: barriers and boundaries to collaborative institutional structures’, in McIntosh, E. and Nutt, D. (eds.) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. London: Routledge, pp.115-125.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2011) Research methods in Education. 7th edn. London: Routledge.
Dashper, K. and Fletcher, T. (2019) ‘“Don't call me an academic”: professional identity and struggles for legitimacy within the vocational field of events management higher education’, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 25, 100201.

Department for Education (2023) Participation measures in higher education: Academic Year 2021/22. Available at: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/... (Accessed: 24 July 2024).

Dobson, I. R. (2000) ‘“Them and Us”: general and non-general staff in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22, pp203-210.

Fox, N. and Alldred, P. (2017) Sociology and the new materialism. London: Sage.

Gravett, K., Taylor, C. A. and Fairchild, N. (2021) ‘Pedagogies of mattering: re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, pp.1-16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580.

Haraway, D. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

Hawley, S., McDougall, J., Potter, J. and Wilkinson, P. (2019) ‘Special section editorial: students as partners in third spaces’, International Journal for Students as Partners, 3, pp.1-4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3980.

Holflod, K. (2023) ‘Playful learning and boundary-crossing collaboration in higher education: a narrative and synthesising review’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(4), pp.465-480. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2142101.

Hubble, S. and Bolton, P. (2021) ‘Mature higher education students in England’, Briefing Paper Number 8809, House of Commons Library. Available at: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8809/CBP... (Accessed: 24 July 2024).
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S. and Masia, B. B. (1964) Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook II: affective domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Lipsky, M. (2010) Street level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Matheson, D. and Wells, P. (1999) ‘What is Education?’, in Matheson, D. and Grosvenor, I. (eds.) An Introduction to the study of Education. London: David Fulton, pp.12-24.

Mathias, L. and Parkes, S. (2021) ‘The rehearsal space: viewing induction and transition work as critical pedagogy practice’, in Seal, M. (ed.) Hopeful pedagogies in higher education. London: Bloomsbury, pp.118-127.

McFarlane B. (2011) ‘The morphing of academic practice: unbundling and the rise of the para-academic’, Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), pp.59-73.

McInnis, C. (1998) ‘Academics and professional administrators in Australian universities: dissolving boundaries and new tensions’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(2), pp161-173.

McIntosh, E. and Nutt, D. (eds.) (2022) The impact of the integrated practitioner in higher education: studies in third space professionalism. London/New York: Routledge.

Merriam, S. B. and Grenier, R. S. (eds.) (2019) Qualitative research in practice: examples for discussion and analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Park, L. (2014) ‘Shifting from reflective practices to reflexivity: an autoethnography of an L2 Teacher Educator’, English Teaching, 69(1), pp.173-198.

Parkes, S. (2018) ‘A learner developer perspective: critiquing dominant practices and cultures within university spaces’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Special Edition, October, pp.1-13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i0.464.

Parkes, S. and Beniston, J. (2021) ‘The policy context of higher education: resistance is possible’, in Seal, M. (eds.) Hopeful pedagogies in higher education. London/New York: Bloomsbury, pp.48-58.

Solomon, N., Boud, D. and Rooney, D. (2006) ‘The in‐between: exposing everyday learning at work’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(1), pp.3-13.

St. Pierre, E. (1997) ‘Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/095183997237278.

Sutton, P. (2015) ‘A paradoxical academic identity: fate, utopia and critical hope’, Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), pp.37-47.

Taylor, C. (2021) ‘Knowledge matters: five propositions concerning the reconceptualisation of knowledge in feminist new materialist, posthumanist and postqualitative approaches’, in Murris, K. (ed.) Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines: an introductory guide. London: Routledge, pp.22-42.

Thomas, L. (2012) Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: a summary of findings and recommendations from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available at: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-... (Accessed: 22 September 2024).

Tinto, V. (2017) ‘Through the eyes of students’, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), pp.254-269. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917.

Trochim, W. (2006) ‘Positivism and post-positivism’, Research methods knowledge base. Available at: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/positvsm.php (Accessed: 19 December 2023).
Universities UK (2019) The Concordat to Support Research Integrity. Available at: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/field/downloads... (Accessed: 20 July 2024).

van Heerden, C. G. (2016) ‘Towards a nomadic ethics in translation praxis’, English Studies in Africa, 59(2) pp.88-100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2016.1239421.

Veles, N., Carter, M. A. and Boon, H. (2019) ‘Complex collaboration champions: university third space professionals working together across borders’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23, pp.2-3, pp.75-85.

Whitchurch, C. (2013) Reconstructing identities in higher education. London: Routledge.

Whitchurch, C. (2015) ‘The rise of third space professionals: paradoxes and dilemmas’, in Teichler, U. and Cummings, W. K. (eds.) Forming, recruiting and managing the academic profession. London: Springer International, pp.79-99.

Willets, D. (2017) A university education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, P. (2010) ‘Special agents: the nature and role of boundary spanners’, ESRC Research Seminar Series. Collaborative futures: new insights from intra and inter-sectoral collaboration. University of Birmingham, Birmingham February.

NB- please note that the same file for author's version and published version is not an error. Also, publication date is Nov 2024 but as yet (27 Nov) the article is pending.