The long-term dynamics of invasive signal crayfish forcing of fluvial sediment supply via riverbank burrowing

Journal article


Sanders, C., Rice, S., Wood, P.J. and Mathers, K.L. 2023. The long-term dynamics of invasive signal crayfish forcing of fluvial sediment supply via riverbank burrowing. Geomorphology. 442, p. 108294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108924
AuthorsSanders, C., Rice, S., Wood, P.J. and Mathers, K.L.
Abstract

Animals are important drivers of sediment dynamics. Invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) have been shown to supply sediment to rivers by burrowing into riverbanks. Burrowing directly transfers excavated sediment into the river and also has an additional indirect affect by promoting riverbank failure. While previous research has isolated burrow densities at a point in time, rates of burrow construction and of burrow loss due to erosion are unknown, which introduces uncertainty into estimates of how much sediment burrows contribute to rivers. Here we report results from a 5-year study that evaluated the temporal dynamics of crayfish populations, rates of burrow loss due to erosion, and the mass of sediment directly supplied to rivers by burrow excavation. At ten reaches across five lowland streams in England, we estimated the mass of sediment displaced by 1861 new and previously constructed burrows. Both crayfish and burrow densities were variable over time, suggesting that burrows contribute temporally variable amounts of fine sediment to riverine systems. 42 % of observed burrows were constructed within the previous 365 days, and individual burrows lasted on average 461 days. Applying this to comparable historical data, an average of 2.0 t km−1 a−1 of sediment was excavated to construct burrows in the study reaches, which is eight times more than estimated in previous studies. Whilst total burrow densities in each year were not consistently correlated with contemporary crayfish densities, the mass of sediment excavated over the prior year was strongly correlated with contemporary crayfish densities. Current fine sediment management practices are largely aimed at controlling fine sediment delivery, predominately from agricultural activities, but biotic burrowing into riverbanks may represent an important and overlooked source of fine sediment supply. Incorporation of biotic processes in sediment dynamics would improve the accuracy of fluvial sediment budgets and enhance the knowledge base underpinning effective fine-sediment management practices.

KeywordsSignal crayfish; Fine sediment; Riverbank erosion; Zoogeomorphology; Biogeomorphology
Year2023
JournalGeomorphology
Journal citation442, p. 108294
PublisherElsevier
ISSN0169-555X
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108924
Official URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X23003446?utm_campaign=STMJ_AUTH_SERV_PUBLISHED&utm_medium=email&utm_acid=279257231&SIS_ID=&dgcid=STMJ_AUTH_SERV_PUBLISHED&CMX_ID=&utm_in=DM415342&utm_source=AC_
FunderUK Research & Innovation (UKRI)
Publication dates
Print01 Dec 2023
Online30 Sep 2023
Publication process dates
Accepted29 Sep 2023
Deposited12 Oct 2023
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Restricted
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
References

Bai, S. and Lung, W.S., 2005. Modeling sediment impact on the transport of fecal bacteria. Water Research, 39(20), pp.5232-5240.
Barbaresi, S., Tricarico, E. and Gherardi, F., 2004. Factors inducing the intense burrowing activity of the red-swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, an invasive species. Naturwissenschaften, 91, pp.342-345.
Belchier, M., Edsman, L., Sheehy, M.R. and Shelton, P.M., 1998. Estimating age and growth in long‐ lived temperate freshwater crayfish using lipofuscin. Freshwater Biology, 39(3), 439446.
Bovbjerg, R.V. (1953) Dominance order in the crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen). Physiological Zoology, 26(2), 173-178.
Brust, V., Bastian, H.V., Bastian, A. and Schmoll, T., 2015. Determinants of between‐year burrow re‐occupation in a colony of the European bee‐eater Merops apiaster. Ecology and Evolution, 5(15), pp.3223-3230.
Bubb, D.H., Thom, T.J. and Lucas, M.C. (2004) Movement and dispersal of the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in upland rivers. Freshwater Biology, 49(3), 357-368.
Butler, D.R., 1995. Zoogeomorphology: Animals as Geomorphic Agents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Castro, J.M. and Thorne, C.R., 2019. The stream evolution triangle: Integrating geology, hydrology, and biology. River Research and Applications, 35(4), 315–326.
Chadwick, D.D., Pritchard, E.G., Bradley, P., Sayer, C.D., Chadwick, M.A., Eagle, L.J. and Axmacher, J.C., 2021. A novel ‘triple drawdown’method highlights deficiencies in invasive alien crayfish survey and control techniques. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(2), pp.316-326.
Coggan, N.V., Hayward, M.W. and Gibb, H., 2018. A global database and “state of the field” review of research into ecosystem engineering by land animals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(4), pp.974-994.
Coombes, M.A. and Viles, H.A., 2015. Population-level zoogeomorphology: the case of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles L.). Physical Geography, 36(3), pp.215-238.
Cooper, R.J., Outram, F.N. and Hiscock, K.M., 2016. Diel turbidity cycles in a headwater stream: evidence of nocturnal bioturbation?. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(6), pp.1815-1824.
Davey, A.J., Bailey, L., Bewes, V., Mubaiwa, A., Hall, J., Burgess, C., Dunbar, M.J., Smith, P.D. and Rambohul, J., 2020. Water quality benefits from an advice-led approach to reducing water pollution from agriculture in England. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 296, p.106925.
Elton, C.S., 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants Chapman & Hall. New York.
Faller, M., Harvey, G.L., Henshaw, A.J., Bertoldi, W., Bruno, M.C. and England, J., 2016. River bank burrowing by invasive crayfish: spatial distribution, biophysical controls and biogeomorphic significance. Science of the Total Environment, 569, pp.1190-1200.
Fischer, C. and Dunand, F., 2016. 3D topography and structure analysis of three European badger (Meles meles) setts from Western Switzerland. Wildlife Biology in Practice, 12(3), pp.26-35.
Funk, J.L., Matzek, V., Bernhardt, M. and Johnson, D., 2014. Broadening the case for invasive species management to include impacts on ecosystem services. BioScience, 64(1), pp.58-63.
Guan, R.Z. and Wiles, P.R., 1999. Growth and reproduction of the introduced crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in a British lowland river. Fisheries Research, 42(3), pp.245-259.
Guan, R.Z. and Wiles, P.R., 1997. Ecological Impact of Introduced Crayfish on Benthic Fishes in a British Lowland River. Conservation Biology, 11(3), pp.641-647.
Guan, R.Z., 1994. Burrowing behaviour of signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana), in the River Great Ouse, England. Freshwater Forum, 4, 155-168.
Gunzburger, M.S. and Guyer, C., 1998. Longevity and abandonment of burrows used by the Red Hills salamander (Phaeognathus hubrichti). Journal of Herpetology, 32(4), pp.620-623.
Hansen, G.J., Ives, A.R., Vander Zanden, M.J. and Carpenter, S.R., 2013. Are rapid transitions between invasive and native species caused by alternative stable states, and does it matter?. Ecology, 94(10), pp.2207-2219.
Harvey, G.L., Moorhouse, T.P., Clifford, N.J., Henshaw, A.J., Johnson, M.F., Macdonald, D.W., Reid, I. and Rice, S.P., 2011. Evaluating the role of invasive aquatic species as drivers of fine sediment-related river management problems: the case of the signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Progress in Physical Geography, 35(4), pp.517-533.
Harvey, G.L., Henshaw, A.J., Moorhouse, T.P., Clifford, N.J., Holah, H., Grey, J. and Macdonald, D.W., 2014. Invasive crayfish as drivers of fine sediment dynamics in rivers: field and laboratory evidence. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(2), pp.259-271.
Harvey, G.L., Henshaw, A.J., Brasington, J. and England, J., 2019. Burrowing invasive species: An unquantified erosion risk at the aquatic‐terrestrial Interface. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(3), pp.1018-1036.
Hassan, M.A., Gottesfeld, A.S., Montgomery, D.R., Tunnicliffe, J.F., Clarke, G.K., Wynn, G., Jones-Cox, H., Poirier, R., MacIsaac, E., Herunter, H. and Macdonald, S.J., 2008. Salmon driven bed load transport and bed morphology in mountain streams. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(4).
Haussmann, N.S., 2017. Soil movement by burrowing mammals: A review comparing excavation size and rate to body mass of excavators. Progress in Physical Geography, 41(1), pp.29-45.
Holdich, D.M. and Reeve, I.D., 1991. Distribution of freshwater crayfish in the British Isles, with particular reference to crayfish plague, alien introductions and water quality. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 1, 139-158.
Holmes, A.L., Green, G.A., Morgan, R.L. and Livezey, K.B., 2003. Burrowing owl nest success and burrow longevity in north central Oregon. Western North American Naturalist, pp.244-250.
IBM. (2021) IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 28. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Johnson, M.F., Rice, S.P. and Reid, I., 2014. The activity of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in relation to thermal and hydraulic dynamics of an alluvial stream, UK. Hydrobiologia, 724, pp.41-54.
Jones, C.G., 2012. Ecosystem engineers and geomorphological signatures in landscapes. Geomorphology, 157, pp.75-87.
Jones, J.I., Murphy, J.F., Collins, A.L., Sear, D.A., Naden, P.S. and Armitage, P.D., 2012. The impact of fine sediment on macro‐invertebrates. River Research and Applications, 28(8), pp.1055-1071.
Kemp, P., Sear, D., Collins, A., Naden, P. and Jones, I., 2011. The impacts of fine sediment on riverine fish. Hydrological processes, 25(11), pp.1800-1821.
Kouba, A., Petrusek, A. and Kozak, P., 2014. Continental-wide distribution of crayfish species in Europe: update and maps. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 413, 5.
Lane, S.N., Tayefi, V., Reid, S.C., Yu, D. and Hardy, R.J., 2007. Interactions between sediment delivery, channel change, climate change and flood risk in a temperate upland environment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32(3), pp.429-446.
Larson, E.R., Kreps, T.A., Peters, B., Peters, J.A. and Lodge, D.M., 2019. Habitat explains patterns of population decline for an invasive crayfish. Ecology ,100(5), e02659.
Light, T., 2003. Success and failure in a lotic crayfish invasion: the roles of hydrologic variability and habitat alteration. Freshwater Biology, 48(10), pp.1886-1897.
Lisle, T.E. and Church, M., 2002. Sediment transport‐storage relations for degrading, gravel bed channels. Water Resources Research, 38(11), pp.1-1.
Mallen‐Cooper, M., Nakagawa, S. and Eldridge, D.J., 2019. Global meta‐analysis of soil‐disturbing vertebrates reveals strong effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28(5), pp.661-679.
Mason, R.J. and Sanders, H., 2021. Invertebrate zoogeomorphology: A review and conceptual framework for rivers. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8(5), p.e1540.
Mason, R.J., Johnson, M.F., Bailey, L., Rice, S.P. and Wood, P.J., 2022. Vertical reworking of sediment by the cased caddisfly Glossosomatidae (Agapetus fuscipes) increases sand exposure and availability in armoured gravel-bed rivers. Geomorphology, 418, p.108475.
Mathers, K.L., Chadd, R.P., Dunbar, M.J., Extence, C.A., Reeds, J., Rice, S.P. and Wood, P.J., 2016. The long-term effects of invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on instream macroinvertebrate communities. Science of the Total Environment, 556, 207-218.
Mathers, K.L., White, J.C., Fornaroli, R. and Chadd, R., 2020. Flow regimes control the establishment of invasive crayfish and alter their effects on lotic macroinvertebrate communities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(5), pp.886-902.
Mathers, K.L., Rice, S.P., Chadd, R. and Wood, P.J., 2022. Influence of invasive crayfish on fine sediment transport, ingress and bed storage in lowland rivers. River Research and Applications, 38(8), pp.1481-1494.
Matthews, W.J. and Marsh‐Matthews, E.D.I.E., 2011. An invasive fish species within its native range: community effects and population dynamics of Gambusia affinis in the central United States. Freshwater Biology, 56(12), pp.2609-2619.
Meysman, F.J., Middelburg, J.J. and Heip, C.H., 2006. Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin's last idea. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(12), pp.688-695.
Naden, P.S., Murphy, J.F., Old, G.H., Newman, J., Scarlett, P., Harman, M., Duerdoth, C.P., Hawczak, A., Pretty, J.L., Arnold, A., Laize, C., Hornby, D.D., Collines, A.L., Sear, D.A. and Jones, J.I., 2016. Understanding the controls on deposited fine sediment in the streams of agricultural catchments. Science of the Total Environment, 547, 366-381.
Parkyn, S.M., 2015. A review of current techniques for sampling freshwater crayfish. Freshwater crayfish: A global overview, pp.1-679.
Peay, S., 2001. Eradication of alien crayfish populations. R&D Technical Report W1-037/TR1, Scott Wilson Resource Consultants.
Pejchar, L. and Mooney, H.A., 2009. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), pp.497-504.
Pulley, S. and Collins, A.L., 2019. Field-based determination of controls on runoff and fine sediment generation from lowland grazing livestock fields. Journal of Environmental Management, 249, p.109365.
Pulley, S. and Collins, A.L., 2021. Can agri-environment initiatives control sediment loss in the context of extreme winter rainfall?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, p.127593.
Rice, S.P., Johnson, M.F., Mathers, K., Reeds, J. and Extence, C., 2016. The importance of biotic entrainment for base flow fluvial sediment transport. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 121(5), pp.890-906.
Rice, S., Pledger, A., Toone, J. and Mathers, K. (2019) Zoogeomorphological behaviours in fish and the potential impact of benthic feeding on bed material mobility in fluvial landscapes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44(1), 54-66.
Rice, S.P., Johnson, M.F., Extence, C., Reeds, J. and Longstaff, H., 2014. Diel patterns of suspended sediment flux and the zoogeomorphic agency of invasive crayfish. Cuadernos de investigación geográfica, 40(1), pp.7-28.
Sanders, H., 2020. Biotic and abiotic controls of burrowing by signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) and the implications for sediment recruitment to rivers (Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University).
Sanders, H., Rice, S.P. and Wood, P.J., 2021. Signal crayfish burrowing, bank retreat and sediment supply to rivers: A biophysical sediment budget. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 46(4), pp.837-852.
Sanders, H., Mason, R.J., Mills, D.N. and Rice, S.P., 2022. Stabilization of fluvial bed sediments by invasive quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 47(14), pp.3259-3275.
Sanders, C.H., Rice, S.P., Wood, P.J. and Albertson, L.K., 2023. River bank burrowing is innate in native and invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) and is driven by biotic and abiotic cues. Biological Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03115-2
Sandström, A., Andersson, M., Asp, A., Bohman, P., Edsman, L., Engdahl, F., Nyström, P., Stenberg, M., Hertonsson, P., Vrålstad, T. and Graneli, W., 2014. Population collapses in introduced non-indigenous crayfish. Biological invasions, 16(9), pp.1961-1977.
Schlacher, T.A., Lucrezi, S., Peterson, C.H., Connolly, R.M., Olds, A.D., Althaus, F., Hyndes, G.A., Maslo, B., Gilby, B.L., Leon, J.X. and Weston, M.A., 2016. Estimating animal populations and body sizes from burrows: Marine ecologists have their heads buried in the sand. Journal of Sea Research, 112, pp.55-64.
Sharp, A., Schofield, J. and Fenner, A., 2010. The effects of cell grazing on the longevity of spider burrows, and the potential consequences for the endangered Pygmy Bluetongue Lizard. Ecological Management & Restoration, 11(1), pp.69-72.
Sibley, P.J., 2000. Signal crayfish management in the River Wreake catchment. In: D. Rogers and J. Brickland (Eds.) Crayfish Conference Leeds. p.84-96.
Sidorchuk, A.Y. and Golosov, V.N., 2003. Erosion and sedimentation on the Russian Plain, II: the history of erosion and sedimentation during the period of intensive agriculture. Hydrological processes, 17(16), pp.3347-3358.
Simberloff, D. and Gibbons, L., 2004. Now you see them, now you don't!–population crashes of established introduced species. Biological Invasions, 6(2), pp.161-172.
Stanton, J.A., 2004 Burrowing behaviour and movement of the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana). Published PhD Thesis, Department of Biology, University of Leicester.
Statzner, B., 2012. Geomorphological implications of engineering bed sediments by lotic animals. Geomorphology, 157, pp.49-65.
Strayer, D.L. and Malcom, H.M., 2006. Long‐term demography of a zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population. Freshwater Biology, 51(1), pp.117-130.
Strayer, D.L., D'Antonio, C.M., Essl, F., Fowler, M.S., Geist, J., Hilt, S., Jarić, I., Jöhnk, K., Jones, C.G., Lambin, X. and Latzka, A.W., 2017. Boom‐bust dynamics in biological invasions: towards an improved application of the concept. Ecology letters, 20(10), pp.1337-1350.
Viles, H.A. (1988) Biogeomorphology. Blackwell: Oxford.
Wilkes, M.A., Gittins, J.R., Mathers, K.L., Mason, R., Casas‐Mulet, R., Vanzo, D., Mckenzie, M., Murray‐Bligh, J., England, J., Gurnell, A. and Jones, J.I., 2019. Physical and biological controls on fine sediment transport and storage in rivers. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6(2), p.e1331.
Wood, P.J. and Armitage, P.D., 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management, 21(2), pp.203-217.

Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/960v0/the-long-term-dynamics-of-invasive-signal-crayfish-forcing-of-fluvial-sediment-supply-via-riverbank-burrowing

Download files


Publisher's version
Sanders et al. 2023.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 72
    total views
  • 57
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 3
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The effects of recreational footpaths on terrestrial invertebrate communities in a UK ancient woodland: a case study from Blean Woods, Kent, UK
Kennett, S., Rintoul‐Hynes, N. and Sanders, C. 2024. The effects of recreational footpaths on terrestrial invertebrate communities in a UK ancient woodland: a case study from Blean Woods, Kent, UK. Biodiversity. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2024.2333305
Ponto-Caspian amphipod co-location with zebra mussel beds (Dreissena polymorpha) is influenced by substrate size and population source
Buckley, P. and Sanders, C. 2024. Ponto-Caspian amphipod co-location with zebra mussel beds (Dreissena polymorpha) is influenced by substrate size and population source. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05515-4
River bank burrowing is innate in native and invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) and is driven by biotic and abiotic cues
Sanders, C., Rice, S., Wood, P.J. and Albertson, L.K. 2023. River bank burrowing is innate in native and invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) and is driven by biotic and abiotic cues. Biological Invasions. 25, p. 3425–3442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03115-2
Stabilisation of fluvial bed sediments by invasive quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis)
Sanders, C., Mason, R., Mills, D. N. and Rice, S. 2022. Stabilisation of fluvial bed sediments by invasive quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5455
Predation preference of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on native and invasive bivalve species
Sanders, H. and Mills, D. 2022. Predation preference of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on native and invasive bivalve species. River Research and Applications. pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4023
Still Here and Still Queer: LGBTQIA+ Staff Network in time of pandemic
Hallenberg, K., Digby-Bowl, C., Dainton, M. and Sanders, H. 2021. Still Here and Still Queer: LGBTQIA+ Staff Network in time of pandemic.
Invertebrate zoogeomorphology: A review and conceptual framework for rivers
Mason, R. and Sanders, H. 2021. Invertebrate zoogeomorphology: A review and conceptual framework for rivers. WIREs Water. 8 (5). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1540
Signal crayfish burrowing, bank retreat and sediment supply to rivers: A biophysical sediment budget
Sanders, H., Rice, S.P. and Wood, P.J. 2021. Signal crayfish burrowing, bank retreat and sediment supply to rivers: A biophysical sediment budget. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5070