‘Identity’ is not only about human relations: the relevance of human-to-non-human interaction in ‘identity’ articulation

This paper concerns the construction of ‘cultural identity’ in the personal everyday lives of a group of high-status professionals living in the UK, who happen to be academics. The paper focuses on the relevance of non-human categories in ‘identity’ construction and advocates for broadening our understanding of this debatable term by acknowledging the relevance of human-to-non-human relations in intercultural communication. The findings demonstrate that non-human categories such as naming, death, and food are central in ‘identity’ construction. This conceptualisation of ‘identity’ broadens our understanding of this highly contested concept and acknowledges the centrality of non-human entities in its manifestation.

Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (4th ed.). Routledge.

Amadasi, S., & Holliday, A. (2017). Block and thread intercultural narratives and positioning: Conversations with
newly arrived postgraduate students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(3), 254–269. https://doi.
org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1276583

Amadasi, S., & Holliday, A. (2018). I already have a culture: Negotiating competing grand and personal narratives in
interview conversations with new study abroad arrivals. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(12), 241–
256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1357727

Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self.
Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304–325.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300304

Auger, N., & Dervin, F. (2021). Special issue: A discourse toolbox for working on interculturality in education.
International Journal of Bias, Identity and Diversities in Education (IJBIDE), 6(1), vi–x.

Badwan, K., & Hall, E. (2020). Walking along in sticky places: Post-humanist and affective insights from a reflective account of two young women in Manchester, UK. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(3), 225–239.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1715995

Beck, U. (2003). ‘The analysis of global inequality: From national to cosmopolitan perspective’. In M. Kaldor, H.
Anheier, & M. Glasius (Eds.), Global civil society (pp. 208–233). Oxford University Press.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin
books.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Sage.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture and Society, 36(6), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 1–41.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. The British Journal of
Sociology, 57(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00092.x

Denzin, N. K. (2000). Aesthetics and the practices of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600208

Edwards, E., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? Bloomsbury.

Fenoulhet, J. (2020). The relational identity of the translator. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(5), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1776722

Ferri, G. (2020). Difference, becoming and rhizomatic subjectivities beyond ‘otherness’. A posthuman framework for
intercultural communication’. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(5), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.
1080/14708477.2020.1774598

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln
(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.

Holliday, A. (2009). The role of culture in English language education: Key challenges. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 9(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470902748814

Holliday, A. (2016a). Doing and writing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Holliday, A. (2016b). Revisiting intercultural competence: Small culture formation on the go through threads of
experience. International Journal of Bias, Identity and Diversities in Education, 1(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.
4018/IJBIDE.2016070101

Holliday, A., & MacDonald, M. N. (2020). ‘Researching the intercultural: Intersubjectivity and the problem with positivism’. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz006

Kebabi, A. (2022). ‘Identity’ and ‘belonging’ in the personal lives of high-status professionals living in the UK: A shift
from conflicted ‘self’ and ‘other’ relations and a move towards the centrality of human to non-human relations [Doctoral dissertation, Canterbury Christ Church University]. CCCU Research Space Repository. https:// repository.canterbury.ac.uk/

Kell, C. (2015). “Making people happen”: Materiality and movement in meaning-making trajectories. Social
Semiotics, 25(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1060666

Kvale, A. (2007). Doing interviews. Sage.
Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–461.

Ros i Solé, C., Fenoulhet, J., & Quist, G. (2020). Vibrant identities and finding joy in difference. Language and
Intercultural Communication, 20(5), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1784633

Rosenthal, F. (1967). Almuqadimatu: Muqadimat fi altaarikh [An introduction to history]. Routledge and Kegan
Paul.

Storry, M., & Childs, P. (2013). Introduction: The ghost of Britain past. In M. Storry, & P. Childs (Eds.), British cultural identities (pp. 2–33). Routledge.

Woodin, J. (2007). ‘Intercultural positioning: Tandem conversations about word meaning’. In R. Weinert (Ed.),
Spoken language pragmatics: An analysis of from-function relations (pp. 208–233). Continuum.

Wodak, R. (2008). ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion-discrimination via discourse. In G. Delanty, R. Wodak, &
P. Jones (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 54–77). Liverpool University Press