Meanings of “mastery” in mathematics education: creation of concourse for a research study

This article outlines the rationale for and methodological choices made in designing an online Q study. Pre-service and experienced secondary mathematics teachers in the UK use the word “mastery” to describe a specific development programme, a curriculum or a set of teacher or student behaviours; these multiple meanings inspired a Q methodological study to identify types of views held by mathematics teachers. The article details the study’s design process, from generation of research question, through concourse and Q sample creation and pilot studies, to the final research design and Q sample. In the UK, changes to teacher practice are often quickly dismissed as fads and fashions, so greater use of Q to evaluate teachers’ views on educational initiatives would be a useful tool to uncover and explain that which is valued by teachers.

ASCL. (2015). Mathematics teaching for mastery. Retrieved from
https://www.ascl.org.uk/help-and-advice/guidance-papers/ascl-guidanc...
130 Jennifer Shearman
Block, J. H., & Burns, R. B. (1976). Mastery learning. Review of Research in Education, 4(1), 3-49.
Boylan, M., & Townsend, V. (2018). Understanding mastery in primary mathematics. Learning to teach in the primary school (4th ed). Milton Keynes: Routledge Ltd
Boylan, M., Wolstenholme, C., Demack, S., Maxwell, B., Jay, T., Adams, G., & Reaney, S. (2019). Longitudinal evaluation of the mathematics teacher exchange: China-England final report. Department for Education.
Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/publications
Bridges, D. (1999). Educational research: Pursuit of truth or flight into fancy? British Educational Research Journal, 25(5), 597-616.
Brown. (2008). ‘Q Methodology’ in Given, L. (ed.) The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Pp. 699-702.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity (1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Department for Education. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. London: HM stationery office.
Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-importance-of-teachin...
Department for Education. (2013). Mathematics programmes of study: Key stages 1 to 4. Retrieved from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-en...
Department for Education. (2016). South Asian method of teaching maths to be rolled out in schools. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/south-asian-method-of-teaching-ma...
Drury, H. (2018). How to teach mathematics for mastery (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Durning, D. (1999). The transition from traditional to postpositivist policy analysis: A role for Q‐methodology. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 18(3), 389-410.
Educational Endowment Foundation (2018). Mastery Learning. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/teach...
Evans, L. (2011). The “shape” of teacher professionalism in England: professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 white paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851-870.
Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. L. (1985). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational leadership, 43(8), 73.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Jerrim, J., & Vignoles, A. (2016). The link between East Asian “mastery” teaching methods and English children's mathematics skills. Economics of Education Review, 50, 29-44.
Keller, F. S. (1968). “Good‐bye, teacher…” 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 79-89.
Kenward, L. (2019). A literature review to guide novice researchers using Q methodology in the development of a framework for concourse management. Nurse Researcher, DOI: 10.7748/nr.2019.e1616
Meanings of ‘Mastery’ in Mathematics Education… 131
Kotuľáková, K. (2019). Identifying teachers’ beliefs prior to CPD training focusing on an inquiry-based approach in science education. Research in Science Education, DOI: 10.1007/s11165-019-9841-0
Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 265-299.
MathsNoProblem!. (2018). Maths no problem! Retrieved from
https://mathsnoproblem.com/
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics... International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
Nazariadli, S., Morais, D. B., Supak, S., Baran, P. K., & Bunds, K. S. (2019). Assessing the visual Q method online research tool: A usability, reliability, and methods agreement analysis. Methodological Innovations, 12(1), DOI: 10.1177/2059799119832194
NCETM. (2016). Mastery explained - what mastery means. Retrieved from https://www.ncetm.org.uk/resources/49450
NCETM. (2017). National centre for excellence in teaching mathematics. Retrieved from www.ncetm.org.uk.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 key findings for the United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-united-kingdom.htm
Ofsted. (2019). Education inspection framework. HM Stationery Office. Retrieved from
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/education-inspection-frame...
Pritchard, D. (2013). What is this thing called knowledge? Routledge.
Pruneddu, A. (2016). QsorTouch [computer software]. https://www.qsortouch.com:
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behaviour; Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stephenson, W. (1993). Introduction to Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 17(1), 1-13.
Watson, A. (2018). Deep mastery. Oxford Education Blog. 4 October 2018.
Retrieved from https://educationblog.oup.com/secondary/maths/deep-mastery
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. London: Sage.