Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? a meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness
Journal article
Gannon, T., Olver, M., Mallion, J. and James, M. 2019. Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? a meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752
Authors | Gannon, T., Olver, M., Mallion, J. and James, M. |
---|---|
Abstract | A meta-analysis was conducted to examine whether specialized psychological offense treatments were associated with reductions in offense specific and non-offense specific recidivism. Staff and treatment program moderators were also explored. The review examined 68 studies and 55,604 individuals who had offended. Three specialized treatments were examined: sexual offense, domestic violence, and general violence programs. Across all programs, offense specific recidivism was 13.4% for treated individuals and 19.4% for untreated comparisons over an average follow up of 66.1 months. Relative reductions in offense specific recidivism were 32.6% for sexual offense programs, 36.0% for domestic violence programs, and 24.3% for general violence programs. All programs were also associated with significant reductions in non-offense specific recidivism. Overall, treatment effectiveness appeared improved when programs received consistent hands-on input from a qualified registered psychologist and facilitating staff were provided with clinical supervision. Numerous program variables appeared important for optimizing the effectiveness of specialized psychological offense programs (e.g., arousal reconditioning for sexual offense programs, treatment approach for domestic violence programs). The findings show that such treatments are associated with robust reductions in offense specific and nonoffense specific recidivism. We urge treatment providers to pay particular attention to staffing and program implementation variables for optimal recidivism reductions. |
Keywords | Offense treatment; meta-analysis; sexual offending; domestic violence; general violence. |
Year | 2019 |
Journal | Clinical Psychology Review |
Journal citation | 73 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
ISSN | 0272-7358 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752 |
Related URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735818303295 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 29 Jun 2019 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 24 Sep 2019 |
Accepted | 27 Jun 2019 |
Accepted author manuscript | |
Output status | Published |
References | Alexander, M. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101-116. doi:10.1007/BF02658841 Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. L. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct. (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. L. (2010a). The psychology of criminal conduct. (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053. doi:10.1016/j/cpr.2002.07.001 Beech, A. R., Freemantle, N., Power, C., & Fisher, D. (2015). An examination of potential biases in research designs used to assess the efficacy of sex offender treatment. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 7, 1-19. doi:10.1108/JACPR-01- Beech, A. R., & Fordham, A. S. (1997). Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 219-237. doi: Bloomfield, S., & Dixon, L. (2015). An outcome evaluation of the Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme (IDAP) and Community Domestic Violence Programme (CDVP). Bown, M. J., & Sutton, A. J. (2010). Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 40, 669-677. Bullock, K., Bunce, A., & Dodds, C. (2017). The mechanics of reform: Implementing correctional programmes in English prisons. The Howard Journal, 57, 3-20. doi: Burlingame, G. M., McClendon, D. T., & Alonso, J. (2011). Cohesion in group therapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 34-42. doi:10.1037/a0022063. Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10, 101-129. Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women and Criminal Justice, 10, 69-93. doi:10.1300/j012v10n02_05 Dennis, J. A., Khan, O., Ferriter, M., Huband, N., Powney, M. J., & Duggan, C. (2012). Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2 Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449-467. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. Dutton, D. G., Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, R., Hart, S. D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1997). Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: An 11-year follow-up. International Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463. doi: 10.2307/2669529 Edleson, J. L., & Syers, M., (1991). The effects of group treatment for men who batter: An 18-month follow up study. Research on Social Work Practice, 1, 227-243. doi: Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C. M., Whitaker, D. J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4, 196-231. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.4.2.196 Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239-262. doi: 10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0 Gallagher, C. A., Wilson, D. B., Hirschfield, P., Coggeshall, M. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3, 19-29. Gannon, T. A., & Ward, T. (2014). Where has all the psychology gone? A critical review of evidence-based psychological practice in correctional settings. Aggression and Violence Behavior, 19, 435-446. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.006 Grubin, D. (2010). Importance of standard practice in delivering effective in the polygraph and forensic psychiatry. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 38, 446-451. Retrieved from http://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/38/4/446.full.pdf Hall, G. C. N (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802-809. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.5.802 Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.73.6.1154 Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194. doi:10.1177/107906320201400207 Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557-560. doi: Hoberman, H. M. (2016). Forensic psychotherapy for sexual offenders: Likey factors contributing to its apparent ineffectiveness. In A. Phenix & H. M. Hoberman (Eds.), Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176, 1091-1096. doi:10.1503/cmaj.060410 Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2007, December). A systematic review of the national and international evidence on the effectiveness of interventions with violent offenders. Långström, N., Babchischin, K. M., Fazel, S., Lichtenstein, P., & Frisell, T. (2015). Sexual offending runs in families: A 37-year nationwide study. International Journal of Laws, D. R., & Marshall, W. L. (1991). Masturbatory reconditioning with sexual deviates: An evaluative review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 13-25. doi:10.1016/0146-6402(91)90012-Y Lipsey, M. W. (2003). Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 69-81. doi:10.1177/0002716202250791 Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Applied social research methods series; Vol. 49. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146. doi:10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7 McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G., Burchard, B., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G., Hoke, S. E., & Bonn-Miller, M. O. (2007). Outcomes in a community sex offender treatment program: A comparison between polygraphed and matched non-polygraphed offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 381-393. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9058-z Meijer, E. H., Verschuere, B., Merckelbach, H. L. G. J., & Crombez, G. (2008). Sex offender management using the polygraph: A critical review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 423-429. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.007 Mews, A., Di Bella, L., & Purver, M. (2017). Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. London: Author. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G., The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6-21. doi:10.1037/a0022200 Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “File Drawer Problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 Sartin, R. M., Hansen, D. J., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2008). Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations. Psicothema, 20, 10-19. Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: Seto, M. C., Marques, J. K., Harris, G. T., Chaffin, M., Lalumière, M. L., Miner, M. H., … Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Good science and progress in sex offender treatment are intertwined: A response to Marshall and Marshall (2007). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 247-255. doi:10.1177/1079063208317733 Smedslund, G., Dalsbø, T. K., Steiro, A., Winsvold, A., & Clench-Aas, J. (2007). Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006048.pub2 Walton, J., & Chou, S. (2015). The effectiveness of psychological treatment for reducing recidivism in child molesters: A systematic review of randomised and nonrandomised studies. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 16, 401-417. doi:10.1177/1524838014537905 Wilcox, D. (2009). Overview: Opportunities and responsibilities. In D. T. Wilcox (Ed.), The use of the polygraph in assessing, treating and supervising sex offenders: A practitioner’s guide (pp.1-8). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. |
Additional information | Creative Commons Licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/890yx/does-specialized-psychological-treatment-for-offending-reduce-recidivism-a-meta-analysis-examining-staff-and-program-variables-as-predictors-of-treatment-effectiveness
Download files
548
total views378
total downloads3
views this month8
downloads this month