Taking sustainability to heart––towards engaging with sustainability issues through heart-centred thinking

There is still much to be done to motivate people to actively engage in issues related to sustainability (ICCiP). While it may seem obvious that thinking about the world in a different way creates the possibility of arriving at new awareness, this paper suggests that such a seemingly ordinary observation shines the light directly on a major obstacle to engagement with sustainability. More broadly, this paper demonstrates the importance of the humanities in helping to understand how human beings make meaning in the world (Kripal 2014) linking directly to issues of sustainability in terms of how people connect with each other and the world at large.

Taking an imaginal approach, and honouring a metaphorical mode of investigation (Voss 2009), this paper positions the heart as an organ of perception able to comfortably move between different ways of engaging with the world. Using the metaphor of epistemological duality with reference to cultural history (McGilchrist 2009; Bound Alberti 2010) as a guide, this paper moves to explore two important ideas; first how a taken-for-granted, epistemological approach towards the world (McGilchrist 2009) could be creating barriers to engage effectively with sustainability, and second, how the separation of body from mind, and heart from brain, when taken as a metaphor, could further guide this understanding.

This paper moves towards the suggestion that when re-considered as an organ of perception (Corbin 1971; Hillman 2007), the heart has a key role to play in guiding people towards different ways of understanding, and subsequently engaging with sustainability.

Bortoft, H. (2010). The wholeness of nature: Goethe’s way of science. Edinburgh, UK: Floris Books.

Bound Alberti, F. (2010). Matters of the heart: History, Medicine and Emotion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cheetham, T. (2012). All the world an icon: Henry Corbin and the angelic function of beings. Berkeley, CA, USA: North Atlantic Books.

Corbin, H. (1971). Mundus imaginalis. En Islam Iranien: Aspects Spirituels et Philosophiques (Paris: Gallimard), 7(4).

Corbin, H. (1997). Alone with the alone: Creative imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi (Mythos Edi). New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.

FTZ-NK (Research and Transfer Centre “Sustainability and Climate Change Management”). (2017). Sustainability and humanities: Linking social values, theology and spirituality towards sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.haw-hamburg.de/en/ftz-nk/events/canterbury.html.

Giovannoni, E., & Fabietti, G. (2014). What is sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. In C. Busco, M. Frigo, A. Riccaboni, & P. Quattrone (Eds.), Integrated reporting: Concepts and cases that redefine corporate accountability. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3_2.

Hancock, P., Huges, B., Jagger, E., Patterson, K., Russell, R., Tulle-Winton, E., et al. (2000). The body, culture and society: An introduction. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Hillman, J. (2007). The thought of the heart and the soul of the world. New York, USA: Spring Publications.

Hoystad, O. (2007). A history of the heart. London, UK: Reaktion Books.

ICCiP (International Climate Change Information Programme). (2017). International Climate Change Information Programme—Rationale. Retrieved November 13, 2017, from http://www.iccip.net/en/rationale.

Jaggar, A., & Bordo, S. (1992). Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (3rd ed.). In A. Jaggar & S. Bordo, (Eds.). New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Rutgers University Press.

Kripal, J. (2007). The serpent’s gift—Gnostic reflections on the study of religion. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.

Kripal, J. J. (2014). Comparing religions. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Livingstone, L. (2016). Interrogating transformative processes in learning and education: an international dialogue: European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) Network. The role, nature and difficulties of dialogue in transformative learning. In From ancient Greence to the present day; How the development of the modern mind distanced us from genuine dialogue. Retrieved from http://esrea-interrogating-tl-processes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/...
McGilchrist, I. (2009). The Master and His Emissary––The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. London, UK: Yale University Press.

Rowson, J., & McGilchrist, I. (2013). Divided brain, divided world—Why the best part of us struggles to be heard. Retrieved from www.thersa.org.

Tarnas, R. (2000). Passion of the western mind; Understanding the ideas that have shaped our worldview. Pimlico, London, UK.
Google Scholar

Vaughan-Lee, L. (1996). The paradoxes of love. California, USA: The Golden Sufi Centre.

Voss, A. (2009). A methodology of the imagination. Eye of the Heart, 4, 37–52.

Weber, A. (2013). Enlivenment: Towards a fundamental shift in the concepts of nature, culture and politics. Berlin, Germany: Heinrich Boll Foundation.