What are ‘unpopular causes’ and how can they achieve fundraising success?
Journal article
Body, A. and Breeze, B. 2016. What are ‘unpopular causes’ and how can they achieve fundraising success? International Journal for Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 21 (1), pp. 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1547
Authors | Body, A. and Breeze, B. |
---|---|
Abstract | Recent efforts to grow and strengthen the culture of philanthropy in the UK have largely focused on two dimensions: the total amount of money donated and the effectiveness of philanthropic spending. This paper explores a third dimension: the destination and distribution of donations. A defining characteristic of charitable giving is that it is voluntary rather than coerced, and the resulting respect for donor autonomy makes people wary of promoting one cause above another or implying that any beneficiary group is more or less ‘worthy’ of support. However, the absence of much comment on, or significant research into, the destination of donations does not alter the fact that some groups succeed in attracting significant philanthropic funds whilst others struggle to secure many – or any – donations. This paper explores the concept of ‘unpopularity’ in the charity sector, especially in relation to its impact on fundraising. We unpack what this loaded phrase means, identify good practice by those seeking support and present case studies of charities that have overcome perceived unpopularity to achieve success in raising voluntary income. We suggest that by investing organisational resources and effort in fundraising, by framing the cause to maximise the arousal of sympathy and minimise concerns about beneficiary culpability, and by avoiding the unintended negative consequences of self-labelling as ‘unpopular’ no charity need assume it is their destiny to languish at the bottom of the fundraising league tables. |
Keywords | Fundraising; philanthropy; unpopular causes |
Year | 2016 |
Journal | International Journal for Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing |
Journal citation | 21 (1), pp. 57-70 |
Publisher | Wiley |
ISSN | 1479-103X |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1547 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 27 Jan 2016 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 27 Oct 2016 |
Accepted | 26 Nov 2015 |
Output status | Published |
References | Andreoni, J. & Payne, A. (2011) Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95, p.334–343 Bachke, M., Alfnes, F. & Wik, M., (2014) Eliciting Donor Preferences, Voluntas, vol. 25, P465-486 Becker, H (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Simon and Schuster Ltd, New York Bekkers, R. & Wiepking, P. (2007) Generosity and Philanthropy: A Literature Review. Amsterdam: Vrije University/Science of Generosity. http://generosityresearch.nd.edu/assets/17632/generosity_and_philant... Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P., (2011) A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), pp. 924-973 Breeze, B. & Lloyd, T. (2012) Richer Lives: Why rich people give. London: Directory of Social Change. Breeze, B. (2012a) Coutts Million Pound Donors Report. London: Coutts Breeze, B. (2012b) Donor and Governmental Perceptions of Charity. In Philanthropy and a Better Society. London: CGAP Breeze, B. (2013) How Donors Choose Charities: The role of personal taste and experiences in giving decisions, Voluntary Sector Review, Vol 4, no. 2, p.165-183 Breeze, B, & Dean, J., (2012) User Views of Fundraising. London: Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy Breman, A. & Granstrom, O. (2008). The more we know, the more we care? Identification and deservingness in a cross-border experiment. Cited in Bachke, M., Alfnes, F. & Wik, M., (2014) Eliciting Donor Preferences. Voluntas, vol. 25, P465-486 Bryant, W.K., Slaughter, H.J., Kang, H., Tax, A. (2003). Participating in Philanthropic Activities: Donating Money and Time. Journal of Consumer Policy 26:43-73 Carpenter, J., Connolly, C., & Myers, C. (2008). Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator Clark, C (1997) Misery and Company: Sympathy in Everyday Life. Chicago and London, Driessens, O., Joye, S. & Biltereyst, O (2013) The X-factor of charity: a critical analysis of celebrities’ involvement in the 2010 Flemish and Dutch Haiti relief shows. Media, Culture and Society vol 34 (6) Duncan, B. (2004), ‘A theory of impact philanthropy’ Journal of Public Economics 88:2159-2180 Farmer, P (2013) How to Fundraise for Unpopular Causes, Charity Choice: 29th January 2013 - accessed 30/04/2015 at http://www.charitychoice.co.uk/the-fundraiser/how-to-fundraise-for-u... Fenton, N., Golding, P. and Radley, A. (1993) Charities, media and public opinion. Loughborough: Department of Social Sciences, University of Loughborough Flores, R. (2013) When charity does not begin at home: Exploring the British socioemotional economy of compassion. Sociological Research Online, 18 (1) 17 Frumkin, P (2006) Strategic Giving: the art and science of philanthropy. Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press Helms, S. E., Scott, B. L., & Thornton, J. P. (2012). Choosing to give more: Experimental evidence on restricted gifts and charitable behavior. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 745–748 Lloyd, T. (2004) Why Rich People Give. London: Association of Charitable Foundations Loseke, D. R. (1997) The whole spirit of modern philanthropy: The construction of the idea of charity, 1912–1992. Social Problems, 44(4), 425–444. Mohan, J & Bulloch, S (2012) The idea of a ‘civic core’: what are the overlaps between charitable giving, volunteering, and civic participation in England and Wales? Working Paper 73, Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham NCVO & CAF (2012) UK Giving: 2012, An Overview of Charitable Giving in the UK 2011/12. London: CAF and NCVO Payne, A (1998) Does the government crowd out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms. Journal of Public Economics 69:323-45 Payne, A., Scharf, K., & Smith, S. (2014) Online Fundraising: the Perfect Ask? Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy working paper no.194 http://is.gd/eUQbQ5 Payton, R & Moody, M. (2008) Understanding Philanthropy: Its meaning and mission. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press Pharoah, C. (2011) Charity Market Monitor 2011: Tracking the funding of UK charities. CaritasData: London Pharoah, C., Chapman, T. & Choudhury, R (2014) An Insight into the Future of Charity Funding in the North East. London: Garfield Weston Foundation Sargeant A and Jay E (2014) Fundraising Management: Analysis, Planning and Practice, 3rd Edition, Routledge, London Sokolowski, W. (1996) Show me the Way to the Next Worthy Deed: Towards a 'Microstructural Theory of Volunteering and Giving. Voluntas 7(3): 259-78. Small, Loewenstein & Slovic (2007), Sympathy and Callousness: the impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organisational Behaviour and Design Making Vol.102 pp143-153 Smith, S (2012) Mind the Gap: the growing generational divide in charitable giving. London: Charities Aid Foundation, Taylor-Gooby, P. (1993) The Future of Giving: Evidence from the British Social Attitudes Survey. Charities Aid Foundation Thelkelsen, A. (2011) Encounters with Philanthropic Information: Cognitive Dissonance and Implications for the Social Sector. Voluntas, vol. 22: 518-545 Thomas, A. (2012) Asylum seekers continue to be stigmatised by the British press. The Guardian, 31/10/12 Titmuss, R (1970) The Gift Relationship: From human blood to social policy. London, George Allen and Unwin Yörük, B. (2012), Charitable solicitations matter: A comparative analysis of fundraising methods. The Journal of Applied Public Economics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 467–487, USA Waters, R., Burnett, A., Lamm, A. & Lucas, J. (2009) Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, vol. 35, Issue 2, pp. 102-106 Weisbrod, Burton A., (1988) The Nonprofit Economy. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA Wiepking, P., & Maas, I. (2009) Resources that make you generous: effects of social and human resources on charitable giving. Social Forces 87.4. Wiepking, P. & Breeze, B. (2012) ‘Feeling Poor, Acting Stingy: the effect of money perception on charitable giving’. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17(1) Wilson, M. (2013) The Celebrity Effect: An Exploratory Study of the Relationship between Celebrity and Charitable Giving using BBC Charity Appeals data accessed on 30/04/2015 at http://www.kent.ac.uk/sspssr/philanthropy/publications/index.html?ta... |
File |
https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/87y60/what-are-unpopular-causes-and-how-can-they-achieve-fundraising-success
Download files
290
total views392
total downloads1
views this month4
downloads this month