| Abstract | Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, have become essential tools in various policing tasks. This mixed method, exploratory study investigates their use and development in UK policing, in general operational and forensic contexts. Data were collected via Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) requests sent to 45 UK police services. The findings indicate that while drones can improve operational efficiency and situational awareness, their integration into forensic settings is hampered by excessive costs, insufficient training, and procedural and regulatory constraints. The study suggests that targeted policy reforms could enhance drones’ utility, broadening police capabilities in routine operations and non-invasive complex investigatory work. Recommendations for policy and practice include developing standardised operating procedures, specialised training programs, cost-mitigation strategies, public transparency measures, and the piloting of programmes to develop advanced sensing (such as LiDAR) and emerging technologies. The paper provides insights for police agencies beyond the UK, aiming to advance their drone capabilities for both routine policing and forensic contexts. |
|---|
| References | Alecto Forensics. (2024) The Uses and Application of Archaeology in Forensic Investigations. Available at: Archaeology in Forensic Investigations – Alecto Forensics (accessed 9th November 2024).
Berezowski V et al. (2021) 'Using ground penetrating radar and resistivity methods to locate unmarked graves: A review', Remote Sensing, 13(15), p. 2880. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152880 (accessed: 3 April 2025).
Blau S and Ubelaker DH (2016) Handbook of Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology. 2nd edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Blau S et al. (2019) 'Exploring non-invasive approaches to assist in the detection of clandestine human burials: Developing a way forward', Forensic Science Research, 4(4), pp. 292–308. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1493809 (Accessed: 3 April 2025).
Braun V and Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77-101. DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Civil Aviation Authority (2022) CAP 722: Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace – Guidance. 10th edn. London: Civil Aviation Authority.
Available at: https://www.caa.co.uk (accessed 3 April 2025).
Civil Aviation Authority (2023) Introduction to drone flying and the UK rules. Available at Introduction to drone flying and the UK rules | Civil Aviation Authority (accessed 9th November 2024).
Daniel J (2012) Sampling essentials: practical guidelines for making sampling choices. London: SAGE.
Davenport GC (2018) ‘Remote sensing and forensic archaeology: A review’, Forensic Science Research, 3(3), pp. 205–215.
Doneus M, Briese C and Fera M et al. (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. Journal of Archaeological Science 4(35): 882-893. DOI 10.1016/J.JAS.2007.06.013
Donnelly LJ and Harrison BA (2020) ‘Application of UAV-based LiDAR for the detection of clandestine graves: A pilot study’, Forensic Science International: Reports, 2, 100049.
Errickson D, Thompson, T and Rankin, B (eds.) (2020) ‘The application of geospatial technologies in forensic archaeology’ in The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Evers E and Peters P (2018) The application of low-altitude near-infrared aerial photography for detecting clandestine burials using a UAV and low-cost unmodified digital camera. Forensic Science International 289: 408-418. DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.020
Field A (2017) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS. 5th edition. London: SAGE.
Gaffney C and Gater J (2006) Revealing the buried past: geophysics for archaeologists. Stroud: Tempus.
Heap V and Waters J (2019) Mixed methods in criminology. Abingdon: Routledge.
Holland TD and Connell SV (2016) The Search and Detection of Human Remains. In: Blau S and Ubelaker DH (eds.) Handbook of Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology. 2nd edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hunter J and Cox (2005) Forensic archaeology: advances in theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Jackman A (2023) Police Drones: Uses, Challenges, Futures Research Report. Available at Police-report.pdf (accessed 9th November 2024).
Jackson K and Bazeley P (2019) Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. 3rd edition. London: SAGE.
Kapageorgiadou V, Zhang M and Johnston E et al. (2024) Trust in Forensic Science Evidence: Project Launch Event Report. Available at https://oro.open.ac.uk/98210 (accessed 9th November 2024).
Killinger DK (2014) Lidar (light detection and ranging). In: Baudulet M (ed) Laser Spectroscopy for Sensing Fundamentals, Techniques and Applications 292-312. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
Marino H and Trombino L (2019) ‘Using LiDAR-derived DEMs to detect historical and modern burial sites’, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(11), pp. 4179–4195.
McKinnon G and Harrison K (2016) Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology in the United Kingdom: Are We Nearly There Yet? In: Blau S and Ubelaker DH (eds.) Handbook of Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology. 2nd edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Morgan RM and Bull PA (2007) ‘The use of geoforensics and remote sensing in the search for clandestine graves’, Forensic Science International, 180(1), pp. 45–53.
Nareddy V (2024) ‘Geoforensic methods for detecting clandestine graves and buried forensic objects in criminal investigations – A review’, Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 10(3), pp. 234–245. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/jfsm/fulltext/2024/10030/geoforensic_method... (accessed: 3 April 2025).
NPCC (2023) Technology and innovation to drive reform. Available at Technology and innovation to drive reform (accessed 9th November 2024).
NPCC (2024a) Use of drones. Available at https://www.npcc.police.uk/our-work/work-of-npcc-committees/operatio... (accessed 9th November 2024).
NPCC (2024b) NPCC drones: BVLOS pathway programme overview. Available at https://www.npcc.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/downloads/publication... (accessed 9th November 2024).
Pringle JK, Ruffell A and Jervis JR et al. (2012) The use of geoscience methods for terrestrial forensic searches. Earth-Science Reviews 114(1-2): 108-123. DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.05.006
Rebmann A, David E and Sorg MH (2000) Cadaver Dog Handbook: Forensic Training and Tactics for the Recovery of Human Remains. Abingdon: Routledge.
Risbøl O and Gustavsen L (2018) LiDAR from drones employed for mapping archaeology-Potential, benefits and challenges. Archaeological Prospection 25(1): 329-338. DOI 10.1002/arp.1712
Rix B (2017) Drones in Policing: a CoPACC Policing Report. Available at CoPaCC-Drones-in-Policing-WEB-1.pdf (accessed 9th November 2024).
Sabri NEM, Singh MKC and Mahmood MS et al. (2023) A scoping review on drone technology applications in forensic science. SN Applied Sciences 5: 233. DOI 10.1007/s42452-023-05450-4
Schindling J and Gibbes C (2014) LiDAR as a tool for archaeological research: a case study. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6: 411-423. DOI 10.1007/s12520-014-0178-3
Schultz JJ and Dupras TL (2008) The Contribution of Forensic Archaeology to Homicide Investigations. Homicide Studies 12(4): 323-413. DOI 10.1177/1088767908324430
Silverman D (2006) Interpreting qualitative data. 3rd edition. London: SAGE.
UK Government (2016) Air Navigation Order 2016 (SI 2016/765). London: The Stationery Office. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/765/contents/made (accessed 3 April 2025).
Wessex Archaeology (2008) LiDAR in Archaeology Available at Our Work | Wessex Archaeology (accessed 9th November 2024). |
|---|