Content analysis of patient safety incident reports for older adult patient transfers, handovers, and discharges: Do they serve organizations, staff, or patients?

Journal article


Scott, Jason, Dawson, Pamela, Heavey, Emily, De Brún, Aoife, Buttery, Andy, Waring, Justin and Flynn, Darren 2021. Content analysis of patient safety incident reports for older adult patient transfers, handovers, and discharges: Do they serve organizations, staff, or patients? Journal of Patient Safety. 17 (8), pp. e1744-e1758. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000654
AuthorsScott, Jason, Dawson, Pamela, Heavey, Emily, De Brún, Aoife, Buttery, Andy, Waring, Justin and Flynn, Darren
Abstract

Objective
The aim of the study was to analyze content of incident reports during patient transitions in the context of care of older people, cardiology, orthopedics, and stroke.

Methods
A structured search strategy identified incident reports involving patient transitions (March 2014–August 2014, January 2015–June 2015) within 2 National Health Service Trusts (in upper and lower quartiles of incident reports/100 admissions) in care of older people, cardiology, orthopedics, and stroke. Content analysis identified the following: incident classifications; active failures; latent conditions; patient/relative involvement; and evidence of individual or organizational learning. Reported harm was interpreted with reference to National Reporting and Learning System criteria.

Results
A total 278 incident reports were analyzed. Fourteen incident classifications were identified, with pressure ulcers the modal category (n = 101,36%), followed by falls (n = 32, 12%), medication (n = 31, 11%), and documentation (n = 29, 10%). Half (n = 139, 50%) of incident reports related to interunit/department/team transfers. Latent conditions were explicit in 33 (12%) reports; most frequently, these related to inadequate resources/staff and concomitant time pressures (n = 13). Patient/family involvement was explicit in 61 (22%) reports. Patient well-being was explicit in 24 (9%) reports. Individual and organizational learning was evident in 3% and 7% of reports, respectively. Reported harm was significantly lower than coder-interpreted harm (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions
Incident report quality was suboptimal for individual and organizational learning. Underreporting level of harm suggests reporter bias, which requires reducing as much as practicable. System-level interventions are warranted to encourage use of staff reflective skills, emphasizing joint ownership of incidents. Co-producing incident reports with other clinicians involved in the transition and patients/relatives could optimize organizational learning.

KeywordsIncident reports; Patient transitions; Patient transfers; Patient discharge; Patient harm; Patient safety
Year2021
JournalJournal of Patient Safety
Journal citation17 (8), pp. e1744-e1758
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
ISSN1549-8425
1549-8417
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000654
Official URLhttps://journals.lww.com/journalpatientsafety/fulltext/2021/12000/content_analysis_of_patient_safety_incident.147.aspx
FunderThe Health Foundation (Reference Number 7204).
Publication dates
OnlineDec 2021
Publication process dates
Deposited13 Nov 2023
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/9654y/content-analysis-of-patient-safety-incident-reports-for-older-adult-patient-transfers-handovers-and-discharges-do-they-serve-organizations-staff-or-patients

Download files


Publisher's version
content_analysis_of_patient_safety_incident.147.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 27
    total views
  • 7
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Writing a research abstract for a conference: 12 tips to excel in your work
Sá-Couto, Carla, Buttery, Andy, Alinier, Guillaume and Weldon, Sharon 2024. Writing a research abstract for a conference: 12 tips to excel in your work. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.54531/hcnh5817
Pilot study: design, delivery and evaluation of a co-produced multi-agency mental health simulation-based education programme
Clarke, Isobel, Philpott, Lauren and Buttery, Andy 2023. Pilot study: design, delivery and evaluation of a co-produced multi-agency mental health simulation-based education programme. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.54531/qzcr2106
Transformative forms of simulation in health care – the seven simulation-based ‘I’s: a concept taxonomy review of the literature
Weldon, Sharon Marie, Buttery, Andy Graham, Spearpoint, Ken and Kneebone, Roger 2023. Transformative forms of simulation in health care – the seven simulation-based ‘I’s: a concept taxonomy review of the literature. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation. https://doi.org/10.54531/tzfd6375
Virtual and augmented reality in healthcare education (VARE) project report
Hatzidimitriadou, E., Taylor, J., Clark, N., Field, S., Reader, J., Buttery, A., Singh, B., Arealis, G. and Sirlantzis, K. 2022. Virtual and augmented reality in healthcare education (VARE) project report. Canterbury Canterbury Christ Church University.