Space diplomacy and the International Space Station

Journal article

Cashman, L. and Lieberman, S. 2023. Space diplomacy and the International Space Station. European Review of International Studies. 10` (23), p. 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-10030002
AuthorsCashman, L. and Lieberman, S.
Abstract

Debates regarding spacepower, and within this, what is meant by space diplomacy, are in their infancy. This article seeks to contribute to these academic discussions and reflects on the role of the International Space Station (ISS) as an asset of space diplomacy. Although it has been showcased as a successful venture of multilateral science diplomacy, US structural power has ensured that it has first and foremost
been a means to project US power and reward strategic partners. As the deadline for decommissioning looms, we argue that now is the time to consider the contributions the ISS has made to space diplomacy and reflect on what will be lost when its life ends.

KeywordsSpace diplomacy structural power ; International Space Station; Space; Multilateralism; Spacepower; Structural power; Artemis Accords
Year2023
JournalEuropean Review of International Studies
Journal citation10` (23), p. 276–302
PublisherBrill
ISSN2196-6923
2196-7415
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-10030002
Official URLhttps://brill.com/view/journals/eris/10/3/article-p276_002.xml
Publication dates
Online09 Apr 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted17 Oct 2023
Deposited17 Apr 2024
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/979zv/space-diplomacy-and-the-international-space-station

Download files

Accepted author manuscript
ISS Space Diplomacy Cashman and Lieberman final approved copy.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 8
    total views
  • 5
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Management actions to address the climate emergency: Motivations and barriers for SMEs and other societal micro/meso-level groups
O'Leary, S., Lieberman, S., Gulyas, A., Ogilvie, M., Bates, D., Heath, T., Pelz, C., Williams, S. and Shalet, D. 2023. Management actions to address the climate emergency: Motivations and barriers for SMEs and other societal micro/meso-level groups. The International Journal of Management Education. 21 (3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100831
The climate emergency across business, community and campaign groups: motivations and barriers to driving change for the common good
O'Leary, S., Gulyas, A., Lieberman, S., Ogilvie, M., Bates, D., Heath, T. and Shalet, D. 2022. The climate emergency across business, community and campaign groups: motivations and barriers to driving change for the common good. Graduate College Working Papers.
Critical spaces: European and U.S. institutions for outer space
Brandenburg, Matthea and Lieberman, Sarah 2022. Critical spaces: European and U.S. institutions for outer space. Astropolitics. 20 (1), pp. 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2022.2098014
European space policy: past consolidation, present challenges and future perspectives
Hoerber, T. and Lieberman, S. Hoerber, T. and Lieberman, S. (ed.) 2019. European space policy: past consolidation, present challenges and future perspectives. Routledge.
ESA and NASA: an historical institutionalist reading of European space policy in an age of autonomy and isolationism
Lieberman, S. 2019. ESA and NASA: an historical institutionalist reading of European space policy in an age of autonomy and isolationism. in: Hoerber, T. and Lieberman, S. (ed.) European Space Policy: Past Consolidation, Present Challenges and Future Perspectives Routledge.
Understanding our changing relationship with space: an international political economy reading of space popularisation
Lieberman, S. 2017. Understanding our changing relationship with space: an international political economy reading of space popularisation. Space Policy. 41, pp. 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2017.04.004
New label no progress: institutional racism and the persistent segregation of Romani students in the Czech Republic
Cashman, L. 2016. New label no progress: institutional racism and the persistent segregation of Romani students in the Czech Republic. Race, Ethnicity and Education. 20 (5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1191698
Using Facebook as an interactive learning environment in European political studies
Lieberman, S. 2013. Using Facebook as an interactive learning environment in European political studies. European Political Science. 10 (1057). https://doi.org/10.1057/EPS.2013.30
Moratoria in international politics: a comparative analysis of the moratoria on genetically modified products and commercial whaling
Lieberman, S., Gray, T. and Groom, A. 2012. Moratoria in international politics: a comparative analysis of the moratoria on genetically modified products and commercial whaling. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 14 (4), pp. 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00479.x
Contested frames: comparing EU versus US GMO policy
Lieberman, S. and Zito, A. 2012. Contested frames: comparing EU versus US GMO policy. in: Howlett, M. and Laycock, D. (ed.) Regulating Next Generation Agri-Food Biotechnologies London Routledge. pp. 95-110
Romani integration in the new EU
Cashman, L. 2009. Romani integration in the new EU.
The World Trade Organisation's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products
Lieberman, S. 2007. The World Trade Organisation's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products.
The role of the European Union in regards to the mobility of Roma
Cashman, L. 2010. The role of the European Union in regards to the mobility of Roma.
Developing a Roma strategy for Europe: what could or should the EU be doing?
Cashman, L. and Butler, E. 2010. Developing a Roma strategy for Europe: what could or should the EU be doing?
Romani mobilities in the context of the new EU: what could or should the EU be doing?
Cashman, L. and Butler, E. 2009. Romani mobilities in the context of the new EU: what could or should the EU be doing?
The so-called ‘moratorium’ on the licensing of new genetically modified (GM) products by the European Union 1998–2004: a study in ambiguity
Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2006. The so-called ‘moratorium’ on the licensing of new genetically modified (GM) products by the European Union 1998–2004: a study in ambiguity. Environmental Politics. 15 (4), pp. 592-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010600785218
Implementing national Romani policy at the local level: Experiences of the preparatory class programme in two Czech cities
Cashman, L. 2008. Implementing national Romani policy at the local level: Experiences of the preparatory class programme in two Czech cities. in: Flynn, M., Kay, R. and Oldfield, J. (ed.) Trans-National Issues, Local Concerns and Meanings of Post-Socialism: Insights from Russia, Central Eastern Europe, and Beyond Lanham, USA University Press of America. pp. 159-176
The role of political myth in the international conflict between the USA and the EU over genetically modified foods and crops
Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2007. The role of political myth in the international conflict between the USA and the EU over genetically modified foods and crops. European Environment. 17 (6), pp. 376-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.466
GMOs and the developing world: a precautionary interpretation of biotechnology
Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2008. GMOs and the developing world: a precautionary interpretation of biotechnology. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 10 (3), pp. 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00304.x
The World Trade Organization's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products: the wisdom of the US challenge to the EU in the WTO
Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2008. The World Trade Organization's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products: the wisdom of the US challenge to the EU in the WTO. Global Environmental Politics. 8 (1), pp. 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.1.33