Exploring teachers’ capacity to engage with remote English language teaching environments: The interface between theory and practice

This chapter takes a snapshot of the current situation in terms of secondary school English teachers’ capacity to engage in teaching remotely, as has been necessary during the COVID-19 pandemic, in three distinct locations within Asia – India, Malaysia, and Taiwan. In addition, taking account of the potential effects of COVID-19, it seeks to uncover any mismatch between teachers’ theoretical understandings of what remote teaching of English language classes involves and what has been happening in practice. It is based upon a small-scale qualitative study that used questionnaire data from English teachers working in secondary schools in different locations and interview data from academics working in the field of English language teacher education in each location. Through the data, the study revisits how teachers’ capacity to teach remotely is modelled as well as making recommendations in terms of supporting and training teachers to deliver classes remotely and the need to pay attention to both teacher and student wellbeing in order to make remote teaching sustainable.

Ahmad, T. (2014). Between school factors: what inhibits Malaysian science teachers from using
ICT, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 1-10.
Balchin, K. & Wild, C. (2015). Expanding the vision: a study of trainee teachers’ beliefs about using
technology in the English language classroom. Asian EFL Journal, 17(4), 37-67.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803360
Balchin, K. & Wild, C. (2016). Exploring the role of recently-qualified English teachers in developing
technology use in language classrooms through communities of practice. British Council ELT
Research Papers 16-05. London: British Council.
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/exploring-role-recently-q...
Balchin, K. & Wild, C. (2018). It’s all in the numbers: enhancing technology use in urban and rural
environments. In Tafazoli, D. (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on technology-enhanced
language learning (pp.203-221), IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5463-
9.ch001
Balchin, K. & Wild, C. (2020). Exploring the role of context and collaboration in normalising
technology use in English language teaching in secondary schools in Malaysia, Computer
Assisted Language Learning, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803360
Bax, S. (2003). CALL - past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-
251X(02)00071-4
Cárdenas-Claros, M. & Oyanedel, M. (2016). Teachers' implicit theories and use of ICTs in the
language classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 207-225.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.988745
Chen, R.J. (2010). Investigating models for pre-service teachers’ use of technology to support studentcentred learning, Computers and Education. 5(1), 32-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015
Cheok, M, Wong, S., Ayub, A. & Mahmud, R. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of e-learning in
Malaysian secondary schools, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2),
20-33.
Coombe, C. & Davidson, P. (2015). Constructing questionnaires. In Brown, J. & Coombe, C. (Eds.),
The Cambridge guide to research in English language teaching (pp.217-223). CUP.
Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & York, C.S. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers:
perception of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2),
55-61.
Ertmer, P. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: how knowledge,
confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect, Journal of Research on Technology in Education
42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E. & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs
and technology integration practices: a critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59,
423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L. & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and learning with ICT
tools: issues and challenges from teachers’ perceptions, Malaysian Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 4(2), 38-57.
Hewson, C., Vogel, C. & Laurent, D. (2016). Internet research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
https://dx.%3Cwbr%3Edoi.%3Cwbr%3Eorg/10.4135/9781473920804
Lee, R., Fielding, N. & Blank, G. (2017). Online research methods in the social sciences: an editorial
introduction. In Fielding, N., Lee, R., & Blank, G. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online
research methods (2nd ed.) (pp.1-16). Sage.
MacDonald, M. & Hill, C. (2021). ‘The educational impact of the Covid-19 rapid response on
teachers, students, and families: insights from British Columbia, Canada’. Prospects, 1–15.
Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09527-5
Magee, G. (2020). Changing behaviours. Online Learning, 6(6), 28-33.
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: the TPACK diagram gets an upgrade, Journal
of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76-78.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a new framework
for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Murphey, T. & Kelly, C. (2020). The need to socialize while social isolating: group surfing on virtual
waves. Online Learning, 6(6), 9-17.
Murray, G. (2009). Narrative inquiry. In Heigham, J. and Croker, R. (Eds.) Qualitative research in
applied linguistics: A practical introduction. (pp.45-65). Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517_3
Nadler, R. (2020). Understanding “zoom fatigue”: theorizing spatial dynamics as third skins in
computer-mediated communication. Computers and Composition, 12(58).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102613
O’Connor, H. & Madge, C. (2017). Online interviewing. In Fielding, N., Lee, R., & Blank, G. (Eds.),
The SAGE handbook of online research methods (2nd ed.) (pp.416-434). Sage.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446268513
Ohashi, L. (2020). Emergency remote teaching: an educational and emotional shift. Online Learning,
6(6), 18-23.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.).
Cambridge University Press.
Richards, L. & Morse, J. (2012). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.).
Sage.
Saudelli, M. & Ciampa, K. (2016). Exploring the role of TPACK and teacher self-efficacy: an
ethnographic case study of three iPad language arts classes. Technology, Pedagogy and
Education, 25(2), 227-247.
Seabra, F., Teixeira, A., Abelha, M. & Aires, L. (2021) Emergency remote teaching and learning in
Portugal: preschool to secondary school teachers’ perceptions. Education Sciences, 11(7),
349. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070349
Walker, A. & White, G. (2013). Technology enhanced language learning. Oxford University Press