Multicenter cohort study, with a nested randomized comparison, to examine the cardiovascular impact of preterm preeclampsia

This study evaluated whether planned early delivery would ameliorate cardiovascular dysfunction six months postpartum, compared to usual care with expectant management, in women with late preterm preeclampsia. We conducted a mechanistic observational study in women with preterm preeclampsia between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks’ gestation, nested within a randomised controlled trial of planned early delivery versus expectant management (usual care), in 28 maternity hospitals in England and Wales. Women were followed up six months postpartum with cardiovascular assessments. The primary outcome was a composite of systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction (by 2009 and 2016 definitions of diastolic dysfunction).
Between 27 April 2016 and 30 November 2018, 623 women were found to be eligible, of whom 420 (67%) were recruited. 133 women were randomised to planned delivery, 137 women were randomised to expectant management within the trial, while 150 women received expectant management outside of the trial. 321 (76.4%) completed their six month echocardiography assessment. 10% (31/321) had a left ventricular ejection fraction <55% whilst 71% (229/321) remained hypertensive. There were no differences in the primary outcome between the two randomised groups (planned delivery versus expectant management) using either the 2009 (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.80, 1.40) or 2016 definitions (RR 0.78; 0.33, 1.86). In conclusion, we demonstrated that late preterm preeclampsia results in persistence of hypertension in the majority, and systolic LV dysfunction in 10%, of women six months postpartum. Planned early delivery does not affect these outcomes. Preeclampsia is not a self-limiting disease of pregnancy alone.