An instinct to play: an evolutionary approach to pretend play

This paper employs an ecological framework in
order to capture the complex, dynamic, interactive and
self-organising nature of children’s engagement with
their world. Drawing on the principles of ecology it
examines parallels between the properties of systems
found in nature and children’s cognitive and adaptive
processes. Similar to ecological systems, children’s
engagement with the world involves constant and
mutually influential interactions between the individual
and his/her environment. This interconnectedness and
inseparability with the world, termed being-in-the
world, enables the exchange of information between
the person and the world and thus allows the
individual to organise his/her own information
structure. Children’s being-in-the-world finds its
expression in role play. This is the field of mimesis,
where children engage in creative appropriation of
their real worlds. The play worlds that children create
whilst in role play may therefore fulfil self
organisational, evolutionary purposes.

[1] Reiners, W. A. and Lockwood, J. A. (2010) Philosophical
Foundations for the Practices of Ecology, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.

[2] Heerwagen, J. H. and Orians, G. H. (2002) ‘The
Ecological World of Children’, in P. H. Kahn and S. R.
Kellert (Eds) Children and Nature: Psychological,
Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations, MA: MIT
Press, Cambridge.

[3] Smith, J. and Jenks, C. (2006) Qualitative Complexity,
Routledge, London and New York.

[4] Maturana, U. and Varela, F. (1980) Autopoiesis and
Cognition, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

[5] Sutton-Smith, B. (2001) The Ambiguity of Play, Harvard
University Press, London.

[6] Papadopoulou, M. and Birch, R. (2008) ‘Being-in-the
world: the event of learning’, Educational Philosophy and
Theory, 41(3), pp. 270-86.

[7]Merleau Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception,
Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

[8] Heidegger, M. (1935) Existence and Being, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.

[9] Kockelmans, J. (ed.) (1967) Phenomenology. The
Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and its Interpretation,
Doubleday & Company Inc, New York.

[10] Smilansky, S. (1990) ‘Sociodramatic Play: its Relevance
to Behaviour and Achievement in School’, in S. Smilansky &
E. Klugman (eds) Children’s Play and Learning: Perspectives
and Policy Implications, Teachers College Press, New York.

[11] Smilansky, S., and Shefatya, L. (1990) Facilitating Play: A Medium for Promoting Cognitive, Socio-Emotional and
Academic Development in Young Children, Silver Springs,
MD: Psychosocial and Educational Publications, USA.

[12] Bergen, D. (2002) ‘The Role of Pretend Play in
Children’s Cognitive Development’, Early Childhood
Research and Practice, 4(1).

[13] Guss, F. (2005) ‘Reconceptualising Play: aesthetic self definitions’, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(3),
pp. 233-43.

[14] Thyssen, S. (2003) ‘Child Culture, Play and Child
Development’, Early Child Development and Care, 173(6),
pp. 589-612.

[15] Piaget, J. (1962) Play, Dreams and Imitation in
Childhood, W. W. Norton and Company Inc., New York.

[16] Freud, S. (1920) ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’, in
Strachey, J. (ed) The Standard Edition of the Complete
Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XVII, The
Hogarth Press, London.

[17] Ashiabi, G. (2007) ‘Play in the Preschool Classroom: its
socioemotional significance and the teacher’s role in play’,
Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), pp. 199-207.

[18] Groos, K. (1898) The Play of Animals, Appleton, New
York.

[19] Pelegrini, A. D. and Smith, P. K (Eds) (2005) The
Nature of Play. Great Apes and Humans, The Guidlford
Press, London.