How Christian universities respond to extremism

This research article explores how two English universities with Anglican foundations responded to UK government requirements to counter radicalization on campus. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with student union representatives, senior staff in the universities responsible for implementing the legal requirements and also those with special responsibility for religion. Christian foundation education institutions are required to implement government policy in response to visible radical and religious extremism. The UK higher education context is post-Christian (with lower levels of religious adherence) and post-secular (with greater plurality and greater prominence of controversial religious-related issues). It presents challenges for Christian university identity when meeting the complex concerns about dangers to students, university independence and free speech, and common values and public accountability. The research found that key to universities being able to respond effectively to the challenge of legal compliance and student welfare, was staff expertise in religion, but they have doubts about their capacity to respond effectively, and both staff and student have fears about this policy.

Carpenter, J.; Glanzer, P.L.; Lantinga, N.S. Christian Higher Education: A Global Reconnaissance, 3rd ed.; Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 2014.
2. Jacobsen, D.; Jacobson, R.H. No Longer Invisible: Religion in University Education; OUP: Oxford, UK, 2012.
3. British Social Attitudes: Record Number of Brits with No Religion. Available online:
http://www.natcen.ac.uk/news-media/press-releases/2017/september/bri...
record-number-of-brits-with-no-religion/ (accessed on 10 July 2018).
4. Bowie, B.; Peterson, A.; Revell, L. Post-secular trends: Issues in education and faith. J. Beliefs Values 2012, 33,
139–143. [CrossRef]
5. Boeve, L. Religious education in a post-secular and post-Christian context. J. Beliefs Values 2012, 33, 143–156.
[CrossRef]
6. Boeve, L. The identity of a Catholic university in post-Christian European societies: Four models.
Louvain Stud. 2006, 31, 238–258. [CrossRef]
7. Casanova, J. Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. Hedgehog Rev. 2006, 8, 7–22.
8. Welcome to The Cathedrals. Available online: http://www.cathedralsgroup.ac.uk/ (accessed on 15 June
2018).
9. Saeed, T. Islamophobia and Securitization: Religion, Ethnicity and the Female Voice; Palgrave: London, UK, 2016.
10. Prevent Duty Guidance. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prevent-duty-
guidance (accessed on 15 June 2018).
11. Bouattia, M. Preventing PREVENT: A Student Handbook on Countering the Prevent Agenda on Campus.
Available online: http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/preventing-prevent-handbook (accessed on 25 July 2017).
100
Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 140
12. UCU. The Prevent Duty: A Guide for Branches and Members. Available online: https: //www.ucu.org.uk/media/7370/The-prevent-duty-guidance-for-branches-Dec-15/pdf/ucu_ preventdutyguidance_dec15.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2017).
13. Panjwani, F.; Revell, L.; Gholami, R. (Eds.) Education and Extremisms: Rethinking Liberal Pedagogies in the Contemporary World Hardcover; Routledge: London, UK, 2017.
14. Gambetta, D.; Hertog, S. Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection between Violent Extremism and Education; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA; Oxford, UK, 2016.
15. Mears, C. In-depth Interviews. In Research Methods and Methodologies in Education; James, A., Michael, W., Robert, C., Larry, H., Eds.; Sage: London, UK, 2012; pp. 170–176.
16. McGrail, P.; Sullivan, J. Dancing on the Edge: Chaplaincy, Church and Higher Education; Matthew James Publishing: Chelmsford, UK, 2007.

Reprinted from: Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 140, doi:10.3390/educsci8030140.