Imagining wrong: fictitious contexts mitigate condemnation of harm more than impurity

Journal article


Sabo, J. and Giner-Sorolla, R. 2017. Imagining wrong: fictitious contexts mitigate condemnation of harm more than impurity . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 146 (1), pp. 134-153.
AuthorsSabo, J. and Giner-Sorolla, R.
Abstract

Over five experiments we test the fictive pass asymmetry hypothesis. Following observations of ethics and public reactions to media, we propose that fictional contexts, such as reality, imagination, and virtual environments, will mitigate people’s moral condemnation of harm violations, more so than purity violations. That is, imagining a purely harmful act is given a “fictive pass,” in moral judgment, whereas imagining an abnormal act involving the body is evaluated more negatively because it is seen as more diagnostic of bad character. For Experiment 1, an undergraduate sample (N = 250) evaluated nine vignettes depicting an agent committing either violations of harm or purity in real life, watching them in films, or imagining them. For Experiments 2 and 3, online participants (N = 375 and N = 321, respectively) evaluated a single vignette depicting an agent committing a violation of harm or purity that either occurred in real life, was imagined, watched in a film, or performed in a video game. Experiment 4 (N = 348) used an analysis of moderated mediation to demonstrate that the perceived wrongness of fictional purity violations is explained both by the extent to which they are seen as a cue to, and a cause of, a poor moral character. Lastly, Experiment 5 (N = 484) validated our manipulations and included the presumption of desire as an additional mediator of the fictive pass asymmetry effects. We discuss implications for moral theories of act and character, anger and disgust, and for media use and regulation.

KeywordsMoral emotions; Moral Judgments; Moral domains; Media; Fiction
Year2017
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Journal citation146 (1), pp. 134-153
PublisherElsevier
ISSN0096-3445
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1037/xge0000251
Official URLhttps://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000251
Publication dates
PrintJan 2017
Publication process dates
Deposited10 Feb 2020
Accepted author manuscript
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/8q984/imagining-wrong-fictitious-contexts-mitigate-condemnation-of-harm-more-than-impurity

  • 1
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Related outputs

What makes moral disgust special? An integrative functional review
Giner-Sorolla, R., Kupfer, T. and Sabo, J. 2018. What makes moral disgust special? An integrative functional review. in: Olson, J. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 57 Elsevier. pp. 223-289