Arendt and political realism: towards a realist account of political judgement

Journal article


Vogler, Gisli and Tillyris, Demetris 2019. Arendt and political realism: towards a realist account of political judgement. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 24 (6), pp. 821-844. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1610843
AuthorsVogler, Gisli and Tillyris, Demetris
Abstract

This article argues that Hannah Arendt’s thought can offer significant insights on political judgement for realism in political theory. We identify a realist position which emphasises the need to account for how humans judge politically, contra moralist tendencies to limit its exercise to rational standards, but which fails to provide a sufficient conception of its structure and potential. Limited appeals to political judgement render the realist defence of the political elusive, and compromise the endeavour to offer a meaningful alternative to the moralist tendency to displace politics. The potential and limitations of realist discussions on judgement are made visible in relation to proto-realists Judith Shklar and Isaiah Berlin.

In seeking to enrich the realist conception of the political, the article introduces the displacement critique found in the neglected Arendtian ‘realism’. It also provides the foundations for a distinctly realist account of political judgement which, we argue, requires elaboration along two dimensions: the social coding of political judgement and the political capacities that help judgement build a suitable political sphere.

KeywordsSociology; Philosophy; Hannah Arendt; Political theory; Realism
Year2019
JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Journal citation24 (6), pp. 821-844
PublisherTaylor & Francis
ISSN1369-8230
1743-8772
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1610843
Official URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1610843
FunderH2020 European Research Council
Publication dates
Online25 Apr 2019
Print19 Sep 2021
Publication process dates
Deposited07 May 2019
Accepted17 Apr 2019
Accepted author manuscript
Output statusPublished
References

Arendt, H., 1958. The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: Allen & Unwin.

Arendt, H., 1963. On Revolution. London: Faber.

Arendt, H., 1978. Life of the Mind: Thinking. London: Secker & Warburg.

Arendt, H., 1979. On Hannah Arendt. In: M. A. Hill, ed. Hannah Arendt: The recovery of the public world. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 301 – 339.

Arendt, H., 1982. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester Press.

Arendt, H., 1994. Essays in Understanding: 1930-1954. New York: Schocken Books.

Arendt, H., 1998. The Human Condition. London: University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, H., 2006. Between Past and Future. London: Penguin Books.

Azmanova, A., 2012. The Scandal of Reason. New York: Columbia University Press.

Baderin, A., 2014. Two forms of realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 13(2),132-153.

Beiner, R., 1983. Political Judgment. London: Methuen.

Bellamy, R., 2010. Dirty Hands and Clean Gloves: Liberal Ideals and Real Politics. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4),412-430.

Benhabib, S., 1988. Judgment and the Moral Foundations of Arendt’s Thought. Political Theory 16(1), 29-51.

Berlin, I., 1976. Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas. London: Chatto & Windus.

Berlin, I., 1990. The Pursuit of the Ideal. In: H. Hardy, ed. The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. London: John Murray,1-19.

Berlin, I., 1997. The Sense of Reality. In: H. Hardy, ed. The Sense of Reality: Studies in Ideas and their History. London: Random House,1-40.

Berlin, I., 1998. The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays. London: Pimlico.

Berlin, I., 1999. Does Political Theory Still Exist? In: H. Hardy, ed. Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press,143-172.

Berlin, I., 2002. Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, ed. H. Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bernstein, R., 1996. Hannah Arendt and the Jewish Question. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourke, R., and Geuss, R., 2009. Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Borren, M., 2013. A Sense of the World: Hannah Arendt’s Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Common Sense. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 21(2),225-255.

Canovan, M., 1983. Arendt, Rousseau, and Human Plurality in Politics. Journal of Politics, 45(2),286-302.

Canovan, M., 1992. Hannah Arendt: Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Disch, L. 1993. More Truth than Fact: Storytelling as Critical Understanding in the Writings of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory, 21(4),665-694.

Ferrara, A., 1999. Justice and Judgement: The Rise and the Prospect of the Judgement Model in Contemporary Political Philosophy. London: SAGE Publications.

Ferrara, A., 2008. The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.

Galston, W., 2010. Realism in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 385-411.

Geuss, R., 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Geuss, R., 2009. What is political judgement? In: R. Bourke and R. Geuss, eds. Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29-46.

Geuss, R., 2010. Politics and the Imagination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Geuss, R., 2015. Realism and the relativity of judgement. International Relations, 29(1),3-22.

Hall, E., 2015. How to do realistic political theory (and why you might want to). European Journal of Political Theory, 16(3), 283-303.

Hanley, R., 2004. Political Science and Political Understanding: Isaiah Berlin on the Nature of Political Enquiry. American Political Science Review, 98(2),327-339.

Hausheer, R., 1979. Introduction. In: H. Hardy, ed. Against the Current. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Honig, B., 1993. Political Theory and the displacement of politics. London: Cornell University Press.

Horton, J., 2010. Realism, liberal moralism, and a political theory of modus Vivendi. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4),431-448.

Horton, J., 2017. What Might it Mean for Political Theory to Be More ‘Realistic’? Philosophia, 45(2),487-501.

Khilnani, S., 2009. Nehru’s Judgement. In: R. Bourke and R. Geuss, eds. Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,254-277.

Lafer, C., 1998. Isaiah Berlin and Hannah Arendt. Hannah Arendt Newsletter,19-24.

Levy, Y., 2011. The Situationality of Moral Judgement and the Limits of Political Philosophy. Political Studies, 59(3),547-563.

Marshall, D., 2010. The Origin and Character of Arendt’s Theory of Judgment. Political Theory, 38(3),367-393.

Mihai, M., 2014. Theorising change: Between reflective judgement and the inertia of political Habitus. European Journal of Political Theory, 15(1),22-42.

Mouffe, C., 2007. Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces. Art and Research, 1(2),1-5.

Nardin, T., 2017. The new realism and the old. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 20(3),314-330.

Owens, P., 2008. The ethic of reality in Hannah Arendt. In: D. Bell, ed. Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme. New York: Oxford University Press, 105-121.

Philp, M., 2007. Political Conduct. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Philp, M., 2010. What is to be done? Political theory and political realism. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4),466-484.

Philp, M., 2012. Realism without Illusions. Political Theory, 40(5), 629-649.

Rossi, E., and Sleat, M., 2014. Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(10),689-701.

Sabl, A., and Sagar, R., 2017. Introduction. Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy, 20(3), 269-277.

Salaverria, H., 2014. Ungeregelte Zweifel und politische Urteilsbildung bei Judith Shklar und Jacques Ranciere. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 62(4),708-726.

Scheuerman, W. E., 2013. The realist revival in political philosophy, or: Why new is not always improved, International Politics, 50(6),798-814.
Schiff, J., 2012. The varieties of thoughtlessness and the limits of thinking. European Journal of Political Theory, 12(2),99-115.

Schwartz, J.P., 2015. To choose one’s company: Arendt, Kant, and the Political Sixth Sense. European Journal of Political Theory, 18(1),108-127.

Shklar, J.N., 1964. Legalism (An Essay on Law, Morals, and Politics). London: Harvard University Press.

Shklar, J.N., 1984. Ordinary Vices. London: Harvard University Press.

Shklar, J.N., 1990. The Faces of Injustice. London: Yale University Press.

Sleat, M., 2011. Liberal Realism: A Liberal Response to the Realist Critique, The Review of Politics, 73 (3),469-496.

Sleat, M., 2013. Liberal realism: A realist theory of liberal politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Sleat, M., 2014. Realism, Liberalism and Non-ideal Theory. Or, Are there Two Ways to do Realistic Political Theory?. Political Studies, 64(1), 27-41.

Terada, R., 2008. Thinking for oneself: Realism and defiance in Arendt. Textual Practice, 22(1), 85-111.

Weidenfeld, M., 2013. Visions of Judgment: Arendt, Kant, and the Misreading of Judgment. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2),254-266.

Williams, B., 1978. Politics and Moral Character. In: S. Hampshire, ed. Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,23-53.

Williams, B., 2002. In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Zerilli, L., 2005. ‘We Feel Our Freedom’: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory, 33(2),158-188.

Zerilli, L., 2012. Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason. Political Theory, 40(1),6-31.

Zerilli, L., 2014. Judgement, in M. T. Gibbons, ed. The Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, London: Blackwell.

Zerilli, L., 2016. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Additional information

Publications router: Date 2019-04-25 of type 'publication_date' with format 'electronic' included in notification
Publications router: Date 2019-04-25 of type 'epub' included in notification
Publications router: Date 2021-09-19 of type 'ppub' included in notification
Publications router: Date 2019-04-25 of type 'issued' included in notification

Page range1-24
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/88z8w/arendt-and-political-realism-towards-a-realist-account-of-political-judgement

  • 133
    total views
  • 221
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Dog-whistling and democracy
Tillyris, D. 2023. Dog-whistling and democracy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481231208147
Dirty hands as a ‘weapon of the weak’: ‘Heroism’, ‘aristocratism’, and the ambiguities of everyday resistance
Tillyris, D. 2023. Dirty hands as a ‘weapon of the weak’: ‘Heroism’, ‘aristocratism’, and the ambiguities of everyday resistance. The Journal of Ethics. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-023-09446-5
‘Painted scenes’ or ‘empty pageants’? Superficiality and depth in (realist) political thought
Tillyris, D. and Edyvane, D. 2022. ‘Painted scenes’ or ‘empty pageants’? Superficiality and depth in (realist) political thought. Philosophy & Social Criticism. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211066849
Review of Flattery and the history of political thought: that glib and oily art (Daniel J. Kapust; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018, v+230pp., ISBN: 9781107043367)
Tillyris, D. 2018. Review of Flattery and the history of political thought: that glib and oily art (Daniel J. Kapust; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018, v+230pp., ISBN: 9781107043367). Contemporary Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0242-3
Value pluralism and public ethics: introduction
Edyvane, D. and Tillyris, D. 2019. Value pluralism and public ethics: introduction. Theoria. 66 (160), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2019.6616001
Dirty hands and suffering
Tillyris, D. 2019. Dirty hands and suffering. Theoria. 66 (160), pp. 95-121. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2019.6616006
Political realism and dirty hands: value pluralism, moral conflict and public ethics
Tillyris, D. 2019. Political realism and dirty hands: value pluralism, moral conflict and public ethics. Philosophia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00071-x
Reflections on a crisis: political disenchantment, moral desolation, and political integrity
Tillyris, D. 2017. Reflections on a crisis: political disenchantment, moral desolation, and political integrity. Res Publica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9387-9
Political integrity and dirty hands: compromise and the ambiguities of betrayal
Tillyris, D. 2017. Political integrity and dirty hands: compromise and the ambiguities of betrayal. Res Publica. 23 (4), pp. 475-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-016-9323-4
After the standard dirty hands thesis: towards a dynamic account of dirty hands in politics
Tillyris, D. 2016. After the standard dirty hands thesis: towards a dynamic account of dirty hands in politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 19 (1), pp. 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9604-6
‘Learning how not to be good’: Machiavelli and the standard dirty hands thesis
Tillyris, D. 2015. ‘Learning how not to be good’: Machiavelli and the standard dirty hands thesis. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 18 (1), pp. 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9508-x
The virtue of vice: a defence of hypocrisy in democratic politics
Tillyris, D. 2015. The virtue of vice: a defence of hypocrisy in democratic politics. Contemporary Politics. 22 (1), pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2015.1112958