Prison history and the ethics of public engagement

Conference paper


Tennant, M. 2018. Prison history and the ethics of public engagement.
AuthorsTennant, M.
TypeConference paper
ContributorsTennant, M.
Description

Dark tourism sites, including prison museums, have been recognised as important spaces through which the public can explore morality in an individualised and secular society (Stone, 2009).

The growing academic literature on prison heritage has recognised problems with existing interpretations of penal heritage, with calls for “more ethical, multi-perspective and politically diverse interpretation” (Barton and Brown, 2015: 237). This chapter argues that greater engagement with the reality of contemporary punishment is necessary in such discussions because of the penal expansionism that has accompanied the growth of former prisons as tourist attractions. There also needs to be further exploration of whether, and how, such multi-perspective approaches can be achieved. In doing this the chapter explores the nature of dissonance in relation to penal heritage. Tunbridge and Ashworth (1996) contend that heritage is inevitably dissonant. Here it is argued that so, too, are crime and punishment. Most discussions of penal heritage, however, focus mainly on particularly controversial and highly politicised sites. Dissonance in relation to the more ordinary use of the prison for criminal containment is less sensational but persistent and complex. It has been recognised that traditional heritage responses to dissonance tend to “obscure the wider cultural and political contexts within which heritage both sits and serves (Smith, 2006: 82). Dissonance, then, may generate problems for these approaches in relation to penal heritage, particularly in processes of stakeholder engagement. This raises challenges for the ways we produce interpretation at such sites and could hamper our ability to develop multi-perspective understandings of prison history. As such we need to engage with the difficulties that dissonance generates for such interpretation.

Notable absences within discussions of multi-perspective approaches are the experiences of crime victims and the families of offenders and prison staff. This obscures female perspectives as women are often affected by the prison through these experiences. Victimisation plays a prominent role in contemporary discourses of crime but is normally absent at penal heritage sites, both in terms of the experiences of offenders’ victims and the high incidence of victimisation which many prisoners themselves have experienced. Despite the complexities of dissonance in relation to crime and punishment, however, the chapter argues that embracing the dissonance of crime and punishment may provide a way of challenging contemporary perceptions which rest on strict binaries between victims and offenders. The creative arts in particular might assist in engaging with the complexities of dissonance and providing ways of developing such interpretations.
Barton, A. and Brown, A. (2015) ‘Show me the Prison! The Development of Prison Tourism in the UK’, Crime, Media, Culture, 11(3). 237-258
Smith, L. (2006) Uses of Heritage, Routledge: London.
Stone, P. R. (2009) ‘Dark Tourism and New Moral Spaces’ in R. Sharpley and P. R. Stone (eds) The Darker Side of Travel: The Theory and Practice of Dark Tourism, Channel View Publications: Bristol. Tunbridge, J. E. and Ashworth, G. J. (1996) Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict, Wiley and Sons: Chichester.

KeywordsPrison heritage; ethics; public history; dark tourism
Year2018
ConferenceDifficult Heritage Conference
File
Publication process dates
Deposited13 Nov 2018
Completed13 Apr 2018
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/88x9q/prison-history-and-the-ethics-of-public-engagement

  • 6
    total views
  • 2
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The pain of others: photographs, the prison and suffering
Tennant, M. 2018. The pain of others: photographs, the prison and suffering.
The university and the prison: an update on constructing heritage at Canterbury
Tennant, M. 2018. The university and the prison: an update on constructing heritage at Canterbury.
Penal heritage: approaches to interpretation
Tennant, M. 2017. Penal heritage: approaches to interpretation.
The Police that never was: Peel, Melbourne and the Cheshire Constabulary, 1829-1856
Tennant, M. 2017. The Police that never was: Peel, Melbourne and the Cheshire Constabulary, 1829-1856.
Challenging the penal present: developing and representing a critical history of the prison
Tennant, M. 2017. Challenging the penal present: developing and representing a critical history of the prison.
A critical history of the prison: using the past to challenge the present
Tennant, M. 2017. A critical history of the prison: using the past to challenge the present.
"There is a crack in everything; it's where the light gets in": some reflections on producing ethical prison heritage
Tennant, M. 2017. "There is a crack in everything; it's where the light gets in": some reflections on producing ethical prison heritage.
Criminology picks up the gauntlet: responses to the Whole Earth exhibition
Hallenberg, K. and Tennant, M. 2015. Criminology picks up the gauntlet: responses to the Whole Earth exhibition.
Criminology picks up the gauntlet: responses to the Whole Earth exhibition
Hallenberg, K. and Tennant, M. 2016. Criminology picks up the gauntlet: responses to the Whole Earth exhibition. in: Woodfield, K. (ed.) Inspire – Teaching and Learning in the Social Sciences HEA.
Fields of struggle: a Bourdieusian analysis of conflicts over criminal justice in England, c. 1820-1850
Tennant, M. 2014. Fields of struggle: a Bourdieusian analysis of conflicts over criminal justice in England, c. 1820-1850. Social History. 39 (1), pp. 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2013.875712