After the standard dirty hands thesis: towards a dynamic account of dirty hands in politics

This essay locates the problem of dirty hands (DH) within virtue ethics – specifically Alasdair MacIntyre’s neo-Aristotelian account in After Virtue. It demonstrates that, contra contemporary expositions of this problem, MacIntyre’s account provides us with a more nuanced account of tragedy and DH in ordinary life, in its conventional understanding as a stark, rare and momentary conflict in which moral wrongdoing is inescapable. The essay then utilizes elements from MacIntyre’s account as a theoretical premise for Machiavelli’s thought so as to set the foundations for a nascent but richer account of DH in politics and move beyond the standard, ‘static’ conceptualization of the problem within this context. In developing a dynamic account of DH, I conceive of politics as a distinct practice and way of life, with its own demands and standards of excellence, and draw on Machiavelli’s thought to sketch some of these. The dynamic account uncovers an inexhaustible tension between two ways of life, each with its own demands and standards of excellence: a virtuous politician should become partially vicious and no longer innocent. Understood in dynamic terms, DH in politics involves a paradox of character, not just a paradox of action as the standard ‘static’ thesis prescribes.

Bavister- Gould, A. (2008): The Uniqueness of After Virtue (or ‘Against Hindsight’), Analyse & Kritik, 30, 55 - 74.

Bellamy, R., 2010. Dirty Hands and Clean Gloves: Liberal Ideals and Real Politics. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 412 - 430.

Berlin, I., 1981. The Originality of Machiavelli, in Against The Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, Ed H. Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 20 - 73.

Berlin, I., 1988. The Pursuit of the Ideal. The New York Review of Books, 35 (4), 1- 6.

Berlin, I., 1990. The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. Ed H. Hardy. London: John Murray.

Donagan, A. (1977): The Theory of Morality. USA: The University of Chicago Press.

Finley, M. I. 2002: The World of Odysseus. New York: New York Review of Books.

Galston, W. (1998): Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gowans, C. W. 2001: Innocence Lost: An examination of Inescapable Moral Wrongdoing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grant, R. W. 1997: Hypocrisy and Integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau and the Ethics of Politics. USA: University of Chicago Press.

Hampshire, S., 1989. Innocence and Experience. USA: Harvard University Press.

Hampshire, S., 1993. Liberalism: The New Twist, The New York Review of Books, 43 - 47.

Hollis, M. 1982. Dirty Hands. British Journal of Political Science, 12(4), 385 - 398.

Hollis, M. 1996: Reason in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, P. 1994: Reclaiming the Aristotelian ruler in J. Horton, & S. Mendus, (eds.) After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press and Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Kant, I. (1903): Perpetual peace: a philosophical essay, translated with introduction and notes by M. C. Smith with a preface by R. Latta. London: Allen & Unwin.

Kis, J. 2008: Politics as a moral problem. New York: Central European University Press.

Machiavelli, N., 1996. Discourses on Livy, translated by H.C. Mansfield & N. Tarcov. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

Machiavelli, N., 1998. The Prince, translated by H.C. Mansfield. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

McCormick, J.P. 2001: Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism. The American Political Science Review, 95 (2), pp. 297 - 313.

MacIntyre, A., 1990. Moral Dilemmas, Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 50, 367 – 382.

MacIntyre, A., 2007. After Virtue: A study in moral theory. USA: University of Notre Dame Press.

Mansfield, H.C., 1996. Machiavelli’s Virtue. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Philp, M., 2001. Political Conduct. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Skinner, Q.B., 2000: The Adviser to Princes, in D. Matravers, J. Pile, & N. Warburton (eds.) Reading Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Mill. London: Routledge, 24 -33.

Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stocker, M., 1990. Plural and conflicting values. Clarendon: Oxford.

Tillyris, D., 2014. Learning how not to be Good: Machiavelli and The Standard Dirty Hands Thesis. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. DOI: 10.1007/s10677-014-9508-x, 1 -16

Walzer, M., 1973. Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, 160 – 180.

Walzer, M., 2004. Arguing About War. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Whelan, F. 2004. Hume and Machiavelli: Political Realism and Liberal Thought. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Williams, B., 1973. A Critique of Utilitarianism, in J.C. Smart and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism: For & Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77 - 150.

Williams, B. 1978: Politics and Moral Character. In S. Hampshire (ed.), Public and Private Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55 – 73.

Williams, B., 2002. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wijze, S., de. 1994. Dirty hands – doing wrong to do right. South African Journal of Philosophy, 13 (1), 27 – 33.

Wijze, S, de. 2005. Tragic Remorse: The anguish of Dirty Hands. Ethical and Moral Practice, 7, 453-471.

Wijze, S., de & Goodwin, T. L. 2009: Bellamy on Dirty Hands and Lesser Evils: A response, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11(3), pp. 529- 540.