The continuing need for 'watchdogs of the wrongly convicted'

Book chapter


Poyser, S. 2012. The continuing need for 'watchdogs of the wrongly convicted'. in: Wrongly accused: who is responsible for investigating miscarriages of justice? London Waterlow. pp. 46-50
AuthorsPoyser, S.
Page range46-50
Year2012
Book titleWrongly accused: who is responsible for investigating miscarriages of justice?
PublisherWaterlow
Output statusPublished
Place of publicationLondon
SeriesJustice Gap
ISBN9781857831924
Publication dates
Print2012
Publication process dates
Deposited03 Dec 2012
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/86v81/the-continuing-need-for-watchdogs-of-the-wrongly-convicted

  • 38
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Re-trial by TV: the and fall of television investigations into miscarriages of justice
Poyser, S. 2011. Re-trial by TV: the and fall of television investigations into miscarriages of justice.
The detective versus the investigative journalist: abilities, skills and characteristics of a successful investigator
Poyser, S. 2011. The detective versus the investigative journalist: abilities, skills and characteristics of a successful investigator.
The media and miscarriages of justice: the past and possible future
Poyser, S. 2010. The media and miscarriages of justice: the past and possible future.
The masters dissertation
Poyser, S. 2006. The masters dissertation.
Miscarriages of justice: critical failure points
Poyser, S. and Savage, S. 2004. Miscarriages of justice: critical failure points.
Miscarriages of justice: the media and their investigations.
Poyser, S. 2008. Miscarriages of justice: the media and their investigations.
Miscarriages of justice: what can we learn?
Poyser, S. 2005. Miscarriages of justice: what can we learn?
Journalistic investigations into miscarriages of justice: the investigative journalist versus the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
Poyser, S. 2012. Journalistic investigations into miscarriages of justice: the investigative journalist versus the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
Investigating crime: The detective versus the investigative journalist
Poyser, S. 2009. Investigating crime: The detective versus the investigative journalist.
Journalists seeking justice
Poyser, S. 2007. Journalists seeking justice.