A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
Journal article
Wills, A., Lea, S., Leaver, L., Osthaus, B., Ryan, C., Suret, M., Bryant, C., Chapman, S. and Millar, L. 2009. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 123 (4), pp. 391-405. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016216
Authors | Wills, A., Lea, S., Leaver, L., Osthaus, B., Ryan, C., Suret, M., Bryant, C., Chapman, S. and Millar, L. |
---|---|
Year | 2009 |
Journal | Journal of Comparative Psychology |
Journal citation | 123 (4), pp. 391-405 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
ISSN | 0735-7036 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016216 |
Publication dates | |
Nov 2009 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 08 Mar 2011 |
Output status | Published |
Permalink -
https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/8501w/a-comparative-analysis-of-the-categorization-of-multidimensional-stimuli-i-unidimensional-classification-does-not-necessarily-imply-analytic-processing-evidence-from-pigeons-columba-livia-squirrels
63
total views0
total downloads1
views this month0
downloads this month