GMOs and the developing world: a precautionary interpretation of biotechnology

Journal article

Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2008. GMOs and the developing world: a precautionary interpretation of biotechnology. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 10 (3), pp. 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00304.x
AuthorsLieberman, S. and Gray, T.
KeywordsGenetically modified
Year2008
JournalThe British Journal of Politics & International Relations
Journal citation10 (3), pp. 395-411
ISSN1369-1481
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00304.x
Publication dates
PrintAug 2008
Publication process dates
Deposited09 Feb 2011
Output statusPublished
Permalink -

https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/84v9w/gmos-and-the-developing-world-a-precautionary-interpretation-of-biotechnology

  • 85
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Finding space for the European Space Agency
Lieberman, S. and Hoerber, T. 2024. Finding space for the European Space Agency. Space Policy. 68, p. 101637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2024.101637
Space diplomacy and the International Space Station
Cashman, L. and Lieberman, S. 2023. Space diplomacy and the International Space Station. European Review of International Studies. 10` (23), p. 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-10030002
Management actions to address the climate emergency: Motivations and barriers for SMEs and other societal micro/meso-level groups
O'Leary, S., Lieberman, S., Gulyas, A., Ogilvie, M., Bates, D., Heath, T., Pelz, C., Williams, S. and Shalet, D. 2023. Management actions to address the climate emergency: Motivations and barriers for SMEs and other societal micro/meso-level groups. The International Journal of Management Education. 21 (3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100831
The climate emergency across business, community and campaign groups: Motivations and barriers to driving change for the common good
O'Leary, S., Lieberman, S., Gulyas, A., Ogilvie, M., Bates, D., Heath, T., Pelz, C., Williams, S. and Shalet, D. 2022. The climate emergency across business, community and campaign groups: Motivations and barriers to driving change for the common good. Graduate College Working Papers.
The climate emergency across business, community and campaign groups: motivations and barriers to driving change for the common good
O'Leary, S., Gulyas, A., Lieberman, S., Ogilvie, M., Bates, D., Heath, T. and Shalet, D. 2022. The climate emergency across business, community and campaign groups: motivations and barriers to driving change for the common good. Graduate College Working Papers.
Critical spaces: European and U.S. institutions for outer space
Brandenburg, Matthea and Lieberman, Sarah 2022. Critical spaces: European and U.S. institutions for outer space. Astropolitics. 20 (1), pp. 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2022.2098014
European space policy: past consolidation, present challenges and future perspectives
Hoerber, T. and Lieberman, S. Hoerber, T. and Lieberman, S. (ed.) 2019. European space policy: past consolidation, present challenges and future perspectives. Routledge.
ESA and NASA: an historical institutionalist reading of European space policy in an age of autonomy and isolationism
Lieberman, S. 2019. ESA and NASA: an historical institutionalist reading of European space policy in an age of autonomy and isolationism. in: Hoerber, T. and Lieberman, S. (ed.) European Space Policy: Past Consolidation, Present Challenges and Future Perspectives Routledge.
Understanding our changing relationship with space: an international political economy reading of space popularisation
Lieberman, S. 2017. Understanding our changing relationship with space: an international political economy reading of space popularisation. Space Policy. 41, pp. 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2017.04.004
Using Facebook as an interactive learning environment in European political studies
Lieberman, S. 2013. Using Facebook as an interactive learning environment in European political studies. European Political Science. 10 (1057). https://doi.org/10.1057/EPS.2013.30
Moratoria in international politics: a comparative analysis of the moratoria on genetically modified products and commercial whaling
Lieberman, S., Gray, T. and Groom, A. 2012. Moratoria in international politics: a comparative analysis of the moratoria on genetically modified products and commercial whaling. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 14 (4), pp. 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00479.x
Contested frames: comparing EU versus US GMO policy
Lieberman, S. and Zito, A. 2012. Contested frames: comparing EU versus US GMO policy. in: Howlett, M. and Laycock, D. (ed.) Regulating Next Generation Agri-Food Biotechnologies London Routledge. pp. 95-110
The World Trade Organisation's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products
Lieberman, S. 2007. The World Trade Organisation's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products.
The so-called ‘moratorium’ on the licensing of new genetically modified (GM) products by the European Union 1998–2004: a study in ambiguity
Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2006. The so-called ‘moratorium’ on the licensing of new genetically modified (GM) products by the European Union 1998–2004: a study in ambiguity. Environmental Politics. 15 (4), pp. 592-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010600785218
The role of political myth in the international conflict between the USA and the EU over genetically modified foods and crops
Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2007. The role of political myth in the international conflict between the USA and the EU over genetically modified foods and crops. European Environment. 17 (6), pp. 376-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.466
The World Trade Organization's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products: the wisdom of the US challenge to the EU in the WTO
Lieberman, S. and Gray, T. 2008. The World Trade Organization's report on the EU's moratorium on biotech products: the wisdom of the US challenge to the EU in the WTO. Global Environmental Politics. 8 (1), pp. 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.1.33